Wednesday, September 23, 2009
This engagement is fairly new, but I definitely smell trouble. This Golden Globe nominated/winner B list movie actress has been entertaining a fairly steady stream of men at her fiance's home. Her fiance is a B list television actor on a very hit show. He must know this is going on as our actress doesn't hide what she has been doing and with whom but our actor doesn't seem to care.
Emily Blunt & John Krasinski
Posted by
ent lawyer
at
1:15 PM
Labels: blind items revealed
Crazy Days and Nights is a gossip site. The site publishes rumors, conjecture, and fiction. In addition to accurately reported information, certain situations, characters and events portrayed in the Blog are either products of the author’s imagination or are used fictitiously. Information on this site may contain errors or inaccuracies; the Blog’s proprietor does not make warranty as to the correctness or reliability of the site's content. Links to content on and quotation of material from other sites are not the responsibility of Crazy Days and Nights.
Cookies & 3rd Party Advertisements Google, as a third party vendor, uses cookies to serve ads on your site. Google's use of the DART cookie enables it to serve ads to your users based on their visit to your sites and other sites on the Internet. Users may opt out of the use of the DART cookie by visiting the Google ad and content network privacy policy. We allow third-party companies to serve ads and/or collect certain anonymous information when you visit our web site. These companies may use non-personally identifiable information (e.g., click stream information, browser type, time and date, subject of advertisements clicked or scrolled over) during your visits to this and other Web sites in order to provide advertisements about goods and services likely to be of greater interest to you. These companies typically use a cookie or third party web beacon to collect this information. To learn more about this behavioral advertising practice or to opt-out of this type of advertising, you can visit https://www.networkadvertising.org/managing/opt_out.asp.
506 comments:
«Oldest ‹Older 201 – 400 of 506 Newer› Newest»http://blindgossip.com/?p=16793 Some think this is Emily. Could this be the reason their engagement is "on the rocks"?
Here's another blind that some think is about John and Emily. I think so too because they refer to the woman in the relationship as the girl and Emily recently signed up for a movie named A Girl. Also, the blind says that there was another blind about the couple where it was predicted they would break up.
http://blindgossip.com/?p=16149
RM- I didn't think of Emily for the coke blind but that's interesting... As for the second blind item, you read my mind! I was just thinking about posting it. I definitely think it's John and Emily.
I think the previous blind they are referring to is here:
http://blindgossip.com/?p=15921
I think I posted it before and many thought it was about Emily (especially with the "not Katy Perry" comment).
It all fits to me and might explain the odd real estate choices, the miserable and disconnected body language in pictures, and the sudden increase in sightings that sound like they are coming from someone's publicist.
I think that article in star is a load of bullshit!!! They can't even get the name of the cinema right, and take a look at those pictures. They're not freaking happy there. Id on't care what anoyone says. That looks like a miserable couple!!!
As soon as I saw that coke blind she came to mind. Sad how obvious it seemed to me. I know I keep repeating myself, but I used to be such a fan of Emily's. Like I used to idolise her. Now I am so grossed out by her!
The coke blind may make sense for another reason. If she was entertainig a string of men it could have been drug related. Someone had alluded to that before.
Either way, like we've been saying for awhile now, things are looking a little bleak for the couple as far as I'm concerned.
Oh, good! There's still some life in this discussion. Here's an open question to anyone here: if they have broken up, what would be the motive for dragging this thing out and continuing to 'play house"? Is it an attempt to not look foolish or...?
Pretzel Logic- I was thinking that myself. At first I thought they were dragging it out through awards season since Emily had some Oscar buzz. Now I don't know. It seemed like there were a lot of candids of Emily when there were all of those rumors about John possibly being the next Captain America so I thought that could be a possible pr move but that still doesn't make a lot of sense... more pics Emily when John needs pr? Long story long: I'm not sure. Even without a motive I'm cynical enough to hop on any kind of "I bet they broke up" bandwagon.
Oh, trust me, crazy766. I'm right beside you on that bandwagon. I've been in the "this is all about PR" camp from the beginning. Like you, I really thought that when she didn't get an Oscar nom for "Young Victoria" we would have quickly seen the end of it.
This whole "relationship" has pretty much been on the fasttrack from the start. I mean, engaged after only ten months dating? That's unusual and challenging for non-celeb couples. It had a definite build towards awards season. Now, the behavior of these two appears to be all over the map.
Maybe the publicists are just trying to create a plausible end by allowing things to quiet a bit before any announcement of a breakup. Perhaps then it will seem less PR driven and simply a celeb couple whose career paths took them in separate directions?
crazy766- In response to your question about the many Emily candid pics being released during the time john was rumored to be in the running for Captain America...
Oddly (or perhaps,not) she is one of the actresses named as reading for the female lead in that very film. Ironically, she could end up being cast while John gets chumped.
Pretzel Logic- I like your idea that they are trying to create a plausible breakup. As much as I think many aspects of this relationship have to do with pr, I think both John and Emily are trying desperately to look like a down to earth couple that will shun the spotlight, Emily has several articles with headlines such as "Emily rejects the Hollywood game" and whatnot. Those pictures walking out of the movies look like they would work perfectly in a "what went wrong?" article in People next to a "John and Emily: Happier Times" display of pics.
Oh Snap! CDAN just posted a picture of Emily Blunt WITHOUT her engagement ring out and about.
There were a few other photos that someone posted in the comments where it looked like the ring MIGHT have actually been there.
These pics were on one of her fansites on another day and I can't tell if she's wearing it or not.
Hmmm....
http://www.emilyblunt.net/gallery/thumbnails.php?album=292
Hi crazy766 thank you for the link. I looked at the candids from March 30 and you are right. You can't tell.
Here's the link to the one on CDAN.
http://4.bp.blogspot.com
/_2njq2Guqp4c/S7Oxn6lXAYI/AAAAAAABIuo/HOFWA9cnFTg/s1600/331+eb.jpg
It's obvious she's not wearing it. The picture was taken on March 30. Same day as the candids in the grocery store parking lot.
Here are 2 other photos from March 30 that show she IS wearing her engagement ring.
http://www.imagebam.com/image/4021e474394443/
http://www.imagebam.com/image/0ae0b974394367/
There is a second set of photos taken later in which Emily is leaving that salon, the Neil George Salon, which show the ring in such a way that even the blindest can see it.
http://hipcelebrity.blogspot.com/2010/03/emily-blunt-gets-her-hair-done.html
The problem I have is that, the hat goes away and the ring appears, then a total wardrobe change and the ring is hiding again....its clear from how she "poses" during candid pics since she got the ring that she's playing games a lot of the time.
@Ariel Abides- Ok. So it does look a little like the ring comes out only when leaving the salon and is mysteriously absent again later? So... I don't know anymore.
These pics are from yesterday. CLEARLY showing us the ring. Still together or at least trying to look like they are. She's been doing a lot of shopping lately?
http://www.laineygossip.com/Emily_Blunt_named_4th_on_Top_10_list_of_actresses_under_30_.aspx?CatID=0&CelID=0
Thanks for the link! Wow! In that last shot she's obviously showing the ring. As if she's saying in your face CDAN!
I don't know what to think. Time will tell...
I'm sitll on the PR bandwaggon. I think they're dragging it out for publicity, and to make it look like it was a genuine breakup... the fact that the ring's there, it's not there, she's hiding it, she's flaunting it - it's like, make up your freaking mind!!!
Here are some more pics from this week!!! One where she is clearly flashing the ring to the paps... so are they now questioning it?
http://img189.imageshack.us/g/emilyblunt03301001.jpg/
So, apparently John is home in Boston. No word on Emily being with him as of yet. I wonder what the deal is. Hopefully she is too busy shopping in LA to make it out there!
Emily's in Boston. This was tweeted late this afternoon.
Spotted: emily blunt and hubby jon K at copley
Urgh. Why couldn't he have just left her behind!!
John loves Emily's behind. AND the rest of her.
So are all of the captions on the Fred Segal photos incorrect and she went shopping there on March 31 instead of April 1? The flight to Boston seems a little long for them to leave Friday morning, fly across the country, and then immediately go out shopping again later that afternoon. Maybe it's just me...
No, it's not just you crazy766. I thought that something seemed a bit out of synch between the date on those photos and the "tweet" of them being sighted in Boston. You helped to clarify it for me. Thanks!
No, it's not just you crazy766. I thought that something seemed a bit out of synch between the date on those photos and the "tweet" of them being sighted in Boston. You helped to clarify it for me. Thanks!
People need to stop playing games! If they broke up. They broke up.
RM- John and Emily need to stop playing games or we need to stop playing games by speculating about their relationship?
Hi crazy766, I'm sorry! I meant Emily needs to stop playing games. Not us! :)
I just checked, and the photos were definitely taken on the first, at around 2pm (I saw it on the picture information, I'm not randomly physic lol.) Weird she left LA shopping, an went straight to the mall in Boston.
I really don't know wha to think of those two anymore... and please don't stop speculating ladies, I'd miss you guys. It's good to have a place to discuss this, where people aren't completely blinded by their "awesome cuteness"... puke :)
RM- I figured that was what you meant. : ) I think I've said this before but sometimes I feel a little guilty for my digs at Emily (hence my misinterpretation of your post).
Anyway... I, like FishNChips, did some additional research that coincidentally distracted me from my academic research but this is way more fun. There were a few more "John Krasinski in Boston" types of tweets. No mention of Emily but people just might not recognize her.
No worries crazy766. Great detective work! I read a few of the other posts on the stalker website and it seems they all not only post the celebrity's name that they saw but also what the celebrity was doing and who they were with. Or at least a description of who they were with.
Question: If Emily was planning to fly to Boston in the evening, why the huge shopping cart full of groceries?
Why stock up on groceries and then high-tail it out of town?
Good question RM! Where are the pics with the huge shopping cart of groceries?
It appears that we have the makings of a fine detective agency here. Thanks for the sleuthing, gang!
I'm curious as to why John would be staying at the Ritz-Carlton. He grew up in Newton, just outside of Boston, and I believe his parents still live there. I wonder why he wouldn't stay with the family this weekend?
My bad! She only had two bags of groceries on March 30. It was on March 3 she had a big shopping cart full of groceries.
I'm afraid my detective skills need honing.
Boston.com reports that John and his family were at Copley and near the Ritz. It seems logical John wasn't staying there if his family was with him.
The family could have been at the Ritz making final arrangements having to do with John and Emily's wedding. Reception? Rehearsal dinner?
http://www.boston.com/ae/celebrity/articles/2010/04/05/stars_warm_up_to_opening_night/?page=2
A couple of tweets within the last 45 minutes have mentioned the two of them on a flight from Boston to New York.
She's referred to as "lady friend" in two tweets.
http://twitter.com/danimcnamara
http://twitter.com/kayluhb
The first tweeter added a few more tweets with bits of info, like where they were seated and the fact they were kissing.
Thanks nosygirl : )
Not falling for the smooching part, how did she see this from where she was sitting? She was rows and rows behind him. I think she's just making her sighting that little bit more exciting.
I also think that John was staying at The Ritz, I know it was mentioned it could have been for a rehearsal dinner, but he was spotted there at 7am. Somehow I think he was just checking in.
Hopefully we'll see more pics of the two of them soon. Still not feeling them!!!
Forgot to add, I know John's family live in Boston, but e has nieces and nephews, his parent's probably don't have any space around holidays :)
In the picture of John on the plane you can see that there is someone sitting next to him. You have to look at the seat next to him and let your eyes adjust for awhile but, there is a person sitting next to him on his right. It looks like it could be Emily. (Same hair color). So, I believe it's Emily.
Personally, I don't want to do this level of sleuthing anymore because I feel like I'm stalking him or something. It's the tweets that are getting to me.
Too much information I guess. I don't like knowing John and Emily's every move from random people that I don't know. I'd rather read the articles and look at the pretty pictures.
:p
RM you are right. I got WAY too into the sleuthing. Deleting comments that make me look like a major creeper... eek!
crazy766 you were not alone! But we are both able to stop ourselves. So, we're not too far gone. That's a good idea to delete old posts. I'll do so when I have time later. All's well that ends well. :)
Did anyone know that Michael Buble said that he would never marry Emily Blunt about four months before their breakup was announced? That must have hurt. It might partially explain her engagement a year and a half later. Take that Buble!
http://www.mirror.co.uk/celebs/news/2008/06/03/michael-buble-will-never-marry-emily-blunt-115875-20593035/
I wonder why he changed his mind?
They are getting married next month according to this article:
http://ow.ly/173QBC
Maybe the blind was wrong all along.
Annnd he's been lost to the disgusting world of the famewhore. Annoucing your wedding date to E! How very Speidi. You stay classy, Mr. Emily Blunt.
WOW. I'm a little shocked. It seems so totally different from the few rumors we've heard about the wedding and the bits and pieces of information that John and Emily have offered up in interviews (in Boston, SMALL, etc). RM says this a lot but time will tell. Let's see if our questions have been answered the first week of July.
One thing though, is this info from a "source" or an official statement?
This info came from an unnamed source, crazy766. Several of the "details" in this story differ greatly from comments either of them has made. I'm guessing a publicist's plant to get interest back up for these two or it was a slow news day at E!, so they decided to create their own news.
Well, maybe they really are happy and in love but just look pissed off and disconnected lately when they are photographed together/we have been reading too much into things. In these photos, for example, I would expect more chemistry, more smiling, more (any?) indications of happiness if they are getting married any day now but who knows?
http://www.popsugar.com/Pictures-Emily-Blunt-John-Krasinski-Walking-Dog-LA-8090303
In the midst of planning her wedding next month, Emily forgot to where her engagement ring when working out. There's no is she or isn't she wearing it with these photos. It is not there and she is looking a bit miserable. Interesting.
http://www.gossipcenter.com/emily-blunt/emily-blunts-pre-wedding-fitness-focus-349616
I saw those photos as well, crazy766. No. There is no mistaking it. The ring is not there. She does, at least to me, seem to be flaunting that fact to the paparazzi. There seems to be a lot of "displaying" of her left hand in many of those shots. YMMV, of course.
Do you think she simply didn't want to risk losing it during her workout, or do you think there's something else going on?
I read into everything which is probably not good and there could very well be a simple explanation as to where the ring is. : ) She may have been afraid of losing it during the workout; however, she wore the ring in previous photos where she was clearly going to or from a workout. She's also worn it when walking the dog. I don't know. Maybe she had to take it to the jeweler for whatever reason?
I'm perhaps guilty of that as well, crazy766. You are right, though. She has been seen with the ring before/after workouts and while out walking the dog. Speaking of...
In the recent "dog walk" photos posted on Popsugar, I noticed something odd (at least to me). In a couple of the shots, youcan see John has his car key fob out. In one he actually appears to be using the remote.
There is a single shot of Emily walking from the parking lot. She has a water bottle, cell phone, and car key fob in her hand. The oddity? Not John's keys. The fob is from a Toyota, which leads me to believe that they took separate vehicles to met up and walk the dog.
I'm sick, I know. Just found it strange that an engaged couple who reportedly live together would take separate cars to go to walk the dog. If they did it to throw off the paps, it sure didn't work! ;)
That is odd. How can you tell they're not John's keys?
Wait. I can tell now. Could she have just wanted to have her keys with her even if John drove? It's just so weird if they took separate cars to meet up and walk the dogs imo. It's a little different than if they had met up for coffee or dinner or something because here they had to change into workout gear before leaving. I don't know. It's like they're trying to work out a joint custody arrangement for who sees the dog and when.
Can someone kindly translate this for me!
http://hollywoodcrush.mtv.com/2010/04/30/emily-blunt-john-krasinski-wedding/
I'm serious, what is Emily trying to say in this interview? That there are no wedding plans? Or is she being coy?
Really Really Lame Ms Blunt. See this is why I think she's completely fake. Sandra Bullock wants to keep the adoption of her little boy a secret unitl its a sure thing, she doens't even let her friends into her home for months. Blunt says she wants to keep her private life private and she plays hide and ring seek with the paps and instead of saying she won't discuss the wedding plans...vomits up this crap! No Blunt, you aren't private, you love everyone speculating about who your sleeping with. Laaaaame.
Well RM, I don't know if I can translate this interview, but here's my take.
I don't think she's forthcoming with any information about a wedding because I'm left with the impression that there won't be one. I think she just couched her responses in a coy fashion in the hope that the story will still be of interest in the Hollywood press.
I'm wondering why MTV chose to interview her about her next film release, "The Adjustment Bureau", when it was just announced earlier this week that Universal had knocked back its release date from mid-July to September 17th. Why discuss a film that won't be released in theatres for another four and a half months?
Thank you Ariel and Pretzel. This interview was worst than the one when she was talking about how John proposed and there were rainbows and pixie dust... some nonsense like that. I think it's tres tacky. I guess we were too quiet on this blog eh? She had to go and "stir the pot" again.
That's a good observation Pretzel about giving an interview for a movie that's not being released until the Fall. IMO, this interview was about the "upcoming wedding".
Sadly, I think Snookie from Jersey Shore would have provided a better answer.
I agree with Pretzel. Her comments are vague because there aren't any wedding plans. To me, it just doesn't seem like they were fitting in a wedding when they've been in negotiations for other projects. John's shooting a movie now and he was in consideration for Captain America (a movie that would have started production in June and required a fierce workout schedule for him to get in shape). Even though the project didn't pan out it still doesn't seem like they were planning a wedding in the midst of all this other stuff. I think Emily wants to project an image that she is private and doesn't want attention but in reality, she loves the extra publicity. She's very crafty.
Aside from the supposed reason for this interview ( Blunt's next film "The Adjustment Bureau" ) and the four and a half month gap between this interview and the film's release, I find two other things odd about this.
If the reason for this interview was indeed to get more info about this film, why did it not contain anything pertaining to said film?
I found it interesting that once the interviewer brought up their last conversation about the engagement, it is Blunt who actually brings up the wedding. When the interviewer begs off that that was not his line of questioning, she persists on the subject in an almost aggressive fashion (providing absolutely no information at all).
Now why would a person, guarding their personal life, do that?
So Emily is going to be at the Cannes Film Festival the week of May 20. No mention of John (who is shooting a movie in NYC anyway). It's sure going to be a packed schedule with their wedding any day now... http://www.wwd.com/fashion-news/fashion-scoops/mamma-mia-amfar-nears-simon-doonan-tops-jude-law-3062421?justin=3062421#/article/fashion-news/fashion-scoops/mamma-mia-amfar-nears-simon-doonan-tops-jude-law-3062421?full=true
I’m back. I’ve been revising for exams so I had to make do with just reading all your lovely comments, as commenting myself would have broken the rules I’d set for myself :p
So Emily is going the Cannes film festival? Would John be listed if he was going as her guest? I can’t see him going to be honest. I don’t think they’d be finished shooting the movie – opinions? Funny how she can fit in this little trip what with her impending wedding…
Read the MTV article and in my opinion, Emily came across as a stuck up, pretentious little madam. If you don’t want to discuss your wedding, then stop talking. How hard is it to say no comment? Yet she is insistent in keeping that little “joke” going. Give it up, no one cares. Is their relationship even real? Am I a bad person for thinking that? The more I think about them as a couple, the more they baffle me.
Thanks for the Cannes info, crazy766. I have not seen that posted anywhere else. They're certainly cutting it close, aren't they?
Welcome back, Eugenie. ITA with your appraisal of how Blunt came off in that interview. I think she set out to be provocative from the start. It was as if she wanted to lead the interviewer along , only to make him look somewhat foolish.
No. I don't think it makes you a bad person for questioning the realness of them as a couple. I've pretty much done that from day one.
Eugenie! Glad you're back! Good for you for sticking to the ground rules you set for yourself during finals!
If John were attending Cannes, I think they would mention it but it's a few weeks away. Also, sometimes I think Emily's sense of humor just translates really poorly in print. To me, she always comes off snotty when it seems like she is trying to be witty.
For Friday, pics of our favorite couple looking as happy as ever. Clearly, the wedding is right around the corner. You can really feel the joy and love this couple has for each other.... or not.
http://www.celebrity-gossip.net/john-krasinski/john-krasinski-and-emily-blunts-dog-day-afternoon-359581
Just when we thought we (could) have seen the end of them, they show up in my Google alerts. Out walking Finn and some strange dog.
http://www.gossipcenter.com/john-krasinski/john-krasinski-and-emily-blunts-dog-day-afternoon-359663
I thought maybe he'd come to his senses, sadly no!
Oh my gosh! Eugenie I was thinking the same thing! I thought they were over and then I ran across those pics and felt that familiar BLECH! feeling in the pit of my stomach. Come on John! Seriously! He looks miserable in every pic they've taken together in the past two months!
I just took a look at that series of photos. I'm no expert in body language, but I don't think you need to be in this case. Wow! Ice cold. They might as well be two casual aquaintances at that dog park.
These two are certainly a tough read!
My read on the photos is that they're pissed the paparazzi have sussed them out again. It's too bad they can't take their pups out to a park without being stalked.
Boo fucking hoo!! I'm sorry. But if you're famous, you have to suck it up and deal with that sort of attention. You can't have it both ways. Yes it sucks, but that's life. They're both in the public eye, not just one of them. There is press interest in two people here. I’d say this about any celebrity, but if you don’t like it, you can leave that industry and go live on a potato farm like Demi Moore!
Their body language to me just always seems so cold. Leaning away from each other, minimal body contact – weird hand holding. What was that? Seriously, break her wrist why don’t you John, that’s sexy ;)
I bet you've all missed my rant's ay? Blame Physics!
Eugenie- I couldn't agree more. If these two were novices to show biz, I might have more sympathy, but the fact is, they are not. They've both been in it long enough to know that this is a side-effect of fame and celebrity.
Sorry, but you can't date and eventually become engaged to a relatively well-known fellow actor and think the press will simply leave you alone, particularly when you publically announce the engagement, play up your "coupleness" on the red carpet, and play "flash the ring".
Regardless of whether or not you believe celebrities should consider the presence of the paparazzi something that comes with working in show business, it is still confusing as to why Emily can barely crack a smile when she is photographed out and about with John but looks like she is having a ball when the photogs are getting pictures of her hanging out with Amy Adams or on one of her trips to Fred Segal. If she is so annoyed by the paparazzi, wouldn't she look annoyed when she's photographed with other people as well? For the most part, she only looks miserable when she is out with her fiance.
maybe they were both recovering from botox injections.
On a serious note:
http://www.starpulse.com/news/index.php/2009/02/05/emily_blunt_paparazzi_are_vultures_
Maybe that's what's happening
Could be RM. Maybe the paparazzi is crazier when she's with John as opposed to by herself or with her girlfriends and that's why she looks upset with John all the time (imo)...
Could be RM. Maybe the paparazzi is crazier when she's with John as opposed to by herself or with her girlfriends and that's why she looks upset with John all the time (imo)...
Awww! They actually look cute together here! http://johnkrasinski.net/index.php/2010/05/18/new-candids-12/
Yes, they do. They look almost too cute. Strange then that just a few days prior to these shots they both looked so miserable while being "papped" in NYC doing something as mundane as walking the dog.
If these photos were also shot by a pap, wonder what would bring about their seeming ease in front of the photographer? Maybe the sea air just brings out the best in them?
Those photographs look fake to me. I'm sorry but we have seen them together recently and they NEVER look happy. Hell, she never looks happy when she's with him, but then suddenly the three of them are photographed on the beach, having a laugh, no. It all looks too perfect to me. Enty was so right, she always manages to crack a smile when her fiancé isn't there, funny that. He also looks a hell of a lot happier on his own. That's what happens when you hook up with someone who’s an “up and comer,” John. I feel cruel, but I have no sympathy for them. Look how much money they earn, all the excellent opportunities they get to experience. Yes, the paparazzi following you must be a pain in the arse at times, but it comes with the job. You can’t have one but not the other in that industry. If the paparazzi are following you, it means that people ARE INTERESTED in you. If they’re not trying to take your picture, they don’t care; it’s as easy as that. And I’m pretty sure you’d be wishing people cared about you once your show is over or your movie bombed (again… touché ;))
And what confuses me, If you didn’t want that sort of that sort of lifestyle John, it really wasn’t the best idea to get “engaged” to such a Hollywood whore.
Sorry this probably doesn’t make sense, I’m in a rush – off to sit my last exam WOOT
Good luck on your last final Eugenie. I hate to say it but, I'm positive they are publicity shots for the movie Something Borrowed.
Here are some other shots of Kate Hudson on the same beach with her co-star.
http://www.popsugar.com/Pictures-Kate-Hudson-8511085?page=0,0,3#3
Seems like it's the same photographer.
Emily looks happier with Ryan Gosling in the pics in this article than she's ever looked with her fiance John. That's showbiz I guess.
http://www.popsugar.com/Pictures-Ryan-Gosling-Michelle-Williams-Jennifer-Lopez-More-amfAR-Party-Cannes-8509710?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+popsugar+%28PopSugar%29
I thought the same thing when I saw those pictures with Ryan! Even though she looked better in those new (staged?) candids with John she has never looked as relaxed or happy as she did with Ryan the other night.
Why was she hanging on him like that? Her people must have gotten wind about the cheating rumors at this point and even if they are all BS, she is currently one of the most popular guesses for any blind item with a cheating female or an engaged starlet who couldn't give two shits about her fiance! How is this helping her public perception?
Whew! Thank you Eugenie, RM, and Blurg! It appears that I wasn't imagining the staged qualities of these pics after all. I mentioned this to a friend of mine who has also been following this "saga". These photos are just too pretty and of high quality to have been taken by some guy jumping out from behind a sand dune and firing off shots.
I agree RM, they do look like they may have been taken by the same photographer who shot the Kate Hudson pics. Maybe a staff photographer from the film's production staff? There was another series of photos shot of John and Emily riding rented bikes that were also of a better quality, and again, they appeared quite relaxed. Emily wore sandals, blush, and eye makeup in these "candids". ;)
I am also suspicious of the photos especially since some of the first pics went to People; however, I feel a little guilty for ragging on them for "too happy" pics when I also bitch when they look miserable (which is most of the time. imo).
Could those pictures of them on the beach have been taken right after this photo shoot?
http://www.popsugar.com.au/Pictures-John-Krasinski-Ginnifer-Goodwin-Beach-Filming-Something-Borrowed-8470673
It says in the article that afterwards John is joined by Emily for a romantic walk on the beach. Hmmmm....
RM- I think so. It looks like the stroll on the beach and the bike ride were taken time frame with the general story to the press being that Emily visited John while filming on location. During his time off, the paparazzi happened to catch John and Emily in various cliche activities for lovebirds.
If they're truly trying to avoid the paps, taking a walk close to a film set where paps already know stars are present isn't the best strategy. So yes, the pics just scream "staged" to me.
Thanks for the good luck, I needed it!!!
I've just taken a look at those pictures of Emily and Ryan, and all I can say is wtf!!! Like someone said (sorry, too lazy to look) she's the most popular choice in all the blinds that involve cheating on their fiancé, or not giving a shit about her fiancé, you'd think her people would have discussed this with her.
I definitely think those beach pictures were publicity for Something Borrowed, maybe the movie people themselves weren't involved in this, but it was organised by their people that's for sure. They had a great photographer on set, Emily came to visit her fiancé at work…it’s the perfect opportunity for them both to get some good press ;)
And seriously, don't feel bad for bitching about them looking too happy - it would be different if any of us believed that this sudden happiness of theirs was genuine, but we don't. They're just full of shit, and I don't see how everyone else can't see it too.
So, apparently Emily is back in NYC already. John came and picked her up on his Vespa. She was an hour away from home and she couldn’t manage a visit? That’s LAME girl, totally lame.
It's possible that she and her people are quite aware of the rumors circulating about her and she simply doesn't care.
Her hanging on Ryan Gosling in those photos from Cannes might very well be her intentionally being provocative, to insure more tongues wagging about it. Maybe she finds controversial press better than no press at all. Nothing would surprise me about that one.
Does anybody know who this dude is? She seems to be enjoying hanging off of his arm as well...
http://img34.imagevenue.com/img.php?image=25037_100052224_122_573lo.jpg
I swear she has no shame. I'm wondering if any magazines or news sites are starting to question whether or not they're legit...
I don't know who this guy is, but I do know who he is NOT. Odd behavior for an engaged woman who is, at least as far as the press says, only weeks away from her wedding. John was alone in New York, yet I don't recall seeing photos of him laughing and hanging on strange women.
With all of the mixed signals these two put out, I'm left with the impression of a couple with an "open" relationship. I swear, they make my head swim!
Can you imagine the press he'd get if he was seen hanging around women and acting the way she does?
Hmm, an open relationshi sounds possible... or you know, a made up one completely ;)
Thankfully, Eugenie, I don't think that he's the type to court that form of press attention. I just don't think it's John's MO.
I think you second possibilty is closer to the truth. ;)
ugenie- I think that guy is her agent or stylist or something. There are quite a few pics of them together at other events and arriving together at LAX. I think there's a bit of a double standard in Hollywood when it comes to cheating females. John would have gotten A LOT of flack if he were hanging on girls the way Emily draped herself over Ryan Gosling at that benefit. Same goes for her relationship with Michael Buble. Lainey (who loves Emily I might add) implied that the couple cheated on each other and had an open relationship, yet Michael is the one blamed for the break up.
On a random note, I think Emily may have been a little tipsy at the Amfar thing.
May is almost over. Did they get married over the weekend?
I'm wondering... One of the dresses Emily wore to the Cannes festival was white. Do you think she was trying on white dresses for Cannes and the fact that the festival was is May, someone thought she was shopping for a wedding dress? She might have said that she needed the dress for an event in May...that's how rumors get started ya know.
Just a thought.
Interesting thought RM. I don't think they got married over the weekend...
Not married. There are pictures of John at a gallery opening in NYC yesterday and no wedding band yet while Emily was in LA at an awards show last night. It doesn't look like there was a May wedding. Also, Emily's supposed to host a charity event this Monday so I don't think we'll see a wedding this weekend either and she has a movie coming out later this month. The timeline for the possibility of a summer wedding is winding down. The Office usually starts shooting at the beginning of July.
Clearly Emily was having a grand old time at Cannes without John. Pics from May 20th...
http://i48.tinypic.com/20k2gyx.jpg
http://i46.tinypic.com/2hrl3pi.jpg
http://i48.tinypic.com/vpafxd.jpg
Oh my! Thanks for the links to the pics P.
They both look a bit tipsy. Doesn't mean anything happened though. I'm trying to keep an open-mind here and not judge. Although I can honestly say I am not that physical with men who are "just friends" The only men I would hug up on like that would be my sons and my significant other. I don't care how close a friend I am. I guess I'm a prude.
P, you’re amazing. Thank you for posting these.
I’m sorry, but you’re “engaged”, just because you’re in a different country, your “engagement” is still ON! You do not behave like that when you’re engaged. Hell, if I behaved like that now, tipsy or not, my boyfriend would not be happy. There are just things that are acceptable, and things that are not. Plus, after all the rumours, that picture really doesn’t shock me. She looks like a cheap whore to me in these pictures and that makes me sad. I used to be a fan, she was so different then. Less skanky, less smug, less arrogant… less whoreish.
If I was John, I'd not be very happy with her. Especially with the rumours about her that have gone round, you'd think she'd want to clear those up. She needs to GTF away. Run John, ruuuuuun!
Thanks P! She just confuses me. Why does she look so much happier with these random men than she has ever looked with John? Seriously? Even if you disregard the candids and assume she looks pissed because she's being followed by people taking pics of her picking up dog s**t, she just never looks into John!
Ok. So obviously we saw May come and go without a wedding so of course, there's another report that the wedding will be in June and Emily is getting a one-of-a-kind designer gown. This wedding report number...4?
http://www.okmagazine.com/2010/06/in-this-issue-emily-john-—-a-dream-june-wedding/
It must be at least, wedding report number 4, crazy766. So, here we go again. I would have thought all of those close pals and sources would have clammed up after the imminent May wedding never materialized. Hope springs eternal, I guess. ;)
Here is John looking thrilled as ever to be with Emily at a charity event. Fake smile?
http://www1.wireimage.com/GalleryListing.asp?navtyp=CAL====436611&qckv=y&nbc1=1
Here is a link to another site speculating why John has been alone in New York so often and citing Enty's revealed blind item.
It also said that John appeared "distracted" between takes and was texting and "sitting in solitude" for most of the day. TROUBLE!
http://crushable.com/entertainment/gallery-john-krasinski-texts-while-filming-something-borrowed/
Maybe other blogs are catching on that something is fishy? At least the ones that don't seem to rely on tips from publicists.
Thank you for the links, ginger64. That crushable.com link was interesting in that I think it's the first that I've read that even hinted at possible problems between the two. As you've suggested, most blog sites are either gushing about them (ala' publicist leaks) or breathlessly anticipating their imminent wedding. Maybe this crushable.com blog will be the first of others to take a more critical look at what may be going on?
Separate tip on Gawker- Wandering around Madison Square Park aimlessly by himself between takes. : (
Well, actually maybe it's a good thing if they're breaking up. Painful now but in the long run better?
http://gawker.com/comment/24270458/?utm_source=twitterfeed&utm_medium=twitter
Thnx ginger and crazy766 for the linx.
Could be more publicity for the movie "Something Borrowed".
However, it is interesting like you said that it seems the "winds are shifting" as far as gushing about how cute a couple they are hmm...
We just have to wait and see if it's on the cover of OK magazine. Then we'll know for sure it's true. :p
Another crushable entry:
http://crushable.com/entertainment/another-emily-blunt-sighting-minus-john-krasinski/?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+b5media%2FGossipGirlReport+%28Gossip+Girl+Report%29&utm_content=Twitter
Dinner and drinks with another dude even though John is still in NYC filming Something Borrowed?
Thanks for that link, ginger64. I find it interesting that this site, crushable.com really is pointedly asking what may be up between the two. I saw they did the same thing in the post with Blunt and Damon in NYC on Friday reshooting some scenes for their upcoming film "The Adjustment Bureau". I thought Enty's comments in last Thursday's Random Photos about John spending a lot of alone time in NYC would be all we heard of this.
Granted, it could of been a meeting with her publicist or agent,but it seems odd to me that John wouldn't join them. Who knows? I'm not in the "biz". Maybe actors like to keep those meetings private?
So she was reshooting during the day, and having a meal out with some bloke at night... 11pm is a little late for a business dinner, no? and if it was a friend, surely she'd bring her "fiance" along?
The pictures from the set of SB make me sad, he doesn't seem himself in a lot of them. Distant, troubled maybe?
Leave now John, and you'll feel better ;)
Me again. Pictures of Emily on set on Friday morning.
http://img258.imagevenue.com/img.php?image=99772_EMILYBLUNT061110PG01_122_422lo.jpg
http://img203.imagevenue.com/img.php?image=99780_EMILYBLUNT061110PG02_122_108lo.jpg
http://img187.imagevenue.com/img.php?image=99788_EMILYBLUNT061110PG03_122_552lo.jpg
She's back to hiding the "ring" again, could this be the beginning of the end *cue dramatic music*
I can't tell if the ring is there or not Eugenie. Her posture is so weird in these pics.
Question: A couple of people on Just Jared were saying that it looked like Matt and Emily were holding hands between takes.
http://justjared.buzznet.com/2010/06/12/matt-damon-reshoots-with-emily-blunt/
I know she plays Matt's love interest in the movie so maybe they were holding hands and laughing as part of the movie but it seemed like the hand holding pictures had a candid quality to them especially with Emily looking into the camera?
I saw the preview for this movie and it kind of looks like they are reshooting one of the scenes in the trailer where they are running through the streets of New York (same clothes, setting, etc). Definitely not a scene where their characters would be cracking up. Obviously they could very easily be filming an entirely different (more humorous) set up where their characters are laughing. I was just speculating...
What's really going on?
Never mind. In another set of pictures I definitely saw a camera behind them when holding hands...
Thanks for those links, Eugenie. More ring hiding? This is getting tiresome. She needs to find a new hook. Emily, dear, the ring is old news now. The paps aren't following you for shots of the ring. Been there, done that. They're following you because it's pushing mid-June and still no walk down the aisle. What gives?
Eugenie- Out of curiosity, where did you find those pics?
My friend works for a magazine and sent them to me :)
I know you said you saw a camera behind them when filming, but there still seems to be a very candid feel about those photos. And she looks a little chubbier since they shot this.
Her posture WAS weird in those photos, it ust bothers me when she does that whole ring hiding thing. No one knows if she has the ring on or not. So if she is covering it, to stop people getting pictures of it, she's making it worse for herself, as people will and ARE already speculating about whether or not they're toether for real, or if she still has the ring on etc.
Move on Emily, no one cares about you two!
: ) Thanks Eugenie!
It seems like they are still together publicly. People have spotted them around New York together but I still say something's off this week. To me, sightings of them out and about don't automatically dispel rumors of trouble in the relationship. Heck, when they do call it quits (and I mean when), they might be spotted hammering out the details of who gets what.
The sightings of John looking sad and distracted on Tuesday and Emily getting dinner and drinks on a Friday night with another guy. Come on! Not to upset the JKras fandom that have pledged their loyalty to the Blunt/Krasinski romance but it just seems shady to me. I feel like we might hear a break up announcement in the next few weeks... maybe after we roll into July without a wedding.
I couldn't agree with you more crazy, there is DEFINITELY something off with them. and like you said, I think they're really only still together publicly, but otherwise something is not right.
I am really hoping we get that annoucement soon about them finishing up.
I was a HUGE fan of Emily's (I keep saying this) but she's changed so much over the last year. She went from one relationship to "another," too quickly in my opinion.
From Twitter
John Krasinski came into the lingerie store today with Emily Blunt...
about 2 hours ago
I never know whether or not to believe this crap. Anybody can post a sighting like this.
Who wants to bet that the source is Emily's publicist?
Isn't there always a source that insists two stars a "very much in love" whenever there are rumblings about a breakup.
Looks like Enty is still the only person calling Emily's bluff!
http://crushable.com/entertainment/update-emily-blunt-and-john-krasinski-are-still-very-much-together/?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=twitter&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+b5media%2Fcrushable+%28Crushable%29&utm_content=Twitter
My, the folks at crushable.com have certainly changed their tune, and quickly. This "update" certainly reads like the "source" AKA publicist,made a list of instances where they were seen together as a couple. So all it takes is a "tweet" of them in a lingere boutique and suddenly they're a happy couple?
I apologise if this doesn’t make much sense. I’m still incredibly hung over from my weekend of (drinking) celebrating the start of the World Cup – go easy on me please. I’m still recovering from England’s first match against the US on Saturday ;)
As soon as I saw that lingerie tweet, I instantly thought – PUBLICIST, so you’re not the only one to think that. It just seems like when people start questioning them, out comes an “adorable” tweet sighting etc… and how reliable are those? Anybody can set a Twitter account up and report seeing a celebrity… Like pretzel said, their report sounds very much like it’s been given the once over by a publicist. Like they’d earn points for every time they mentioned when they’ve been seen together in the last month.
I’m kind of disappointed in crushable.com though, I thought they were finally seeing things the way a lot of us were… how it IS!!!! No, couples don’t have to do everything together, but when these two are seen out and about with each other, they BOTH look miserable - even when they are unaware of being papped. Or when they’re at an event and are posing for photographs, they just look too “cutsie” and fake for my liking.
I don’t think Enty is the only person calling Emily’s bluff, just the only person with the guts to do so.
I can only speak for myself, but when I read that crushable.com update with a "source" saying that any rumors of the two splitting are false,it raised a red flag for me. If these two are happy and secure in their relationship, why bother to address rumors at all? Why should it bother them or any one who knows them personally or professionally? Seems to me, you'd simply carry on with your lives and ignore the rumors.
Sorry. I still think these two are heading for "splitsville".
It's probably the same source that said they were getting married in May, and this month, and in four different places.
Pretzel makes a good point though. It seems like whenever someone makes a statement that a couple is
absolutely not breaking up, we get a breakup announcement a week later.
I couldn't agree more. If there is nothing going on, why bother addressing the situation at all. This sounds all too similar to Jen and Brad to me... and Ben A and Jen Lopez... oh and Reese and Jake ;)
As soon as anything negative is said about them, we get a "cute" sighting, or a source said.... not falling for it!!!
*Off to the pub to watch New Zealand... what? we share the same Queen, it's only fair I go show my support ;)*
Pictures of John & Emily arriving at LA international airport
http://img131.imagevenue.com/img.php?image=26336_17thJune2010LAX1_122_129lo.jpg
http://img156.imagevenue.com/img.php?image=26347_17thJune2010LAX3_122_507lo.jpg
http://img248.imagevenue.com/img.php?image=26357_17thJune2010LAX4_122_162lo.jpg
http://img225.imagevenue.com/img.php?image=26363_17thJune2010LAX7_122_984lo.jpg
http://img109.imagevenue.com/img.php?image=26370_17thJune2010LAX8_122_563lo.jpg
http://img250.imagevenue.com/img.php?image=26380_17thJune2010LAX10_122_202lo.jpg
http://img249.imagevenue.com/img.php?image=26389_17thJune2010LAX11_122_132lo.jpg
http://img252.imagevenue.com/img.php?image=26397_17thJune2010LAX12_122_497lo.jpg
http://img252.imagevenue.com/img.php?image=26409_17thJune2010LAX13_122_137lo.jpg
http://img159.imagevenue.com/img.php?image=26419_17thJune2010LAX16_122_110lo.jpg
I hate to say it, but I think these are a set up. They're NEVER smiley when it comes to the paps at the airport - rumours fly around about the two of them, and they're suddenly all smiles and hand in hand with the press outside the airport entrance? I just don't buy it. I wouldn't be surprised if they were told what to do by their people before they left.
Eugenie, I was just going to talk about this for my latest conspiracy theory angle. I saw these on John's fansite. The weird thing is, one of the visitors said she saw Emily at a coffeeshop on Wednesday (the day before she supposedly flew in). These pics were supposedly taken today. John was filiming in NYC yesterday so they probably didn't fly in yesterday and then Emily went to get coffee by herself.
Normally I would say that the person was wrong and didn't see Emily but the girl commented on his fansite.
http://johnkrasinski.net
I think she would definitely be able to confirm it was Emily. I thought she could be picking him up and was just wheeling one of his suitcases but I looked at another pick of her arriving at the airport (alone) and she had the same suitcase she's wheeling in that picture. It makes me wonder if they really flew back together. I know it would be an over the top plan to fake arriving at the airport together but meh, just thought I'd throw it out there.
On a side note, we miraculously got another sighting of them together looking extra cutesy. I hope he's not coming home for a wedding this weekend though if he were, it be be odd that he is just getting back now if he's supposed to get married in two or three days.
I am totally on board with you, Eugenie. When I saw these, I instantly thought that the two had been "instructed" how to react by a publicist. They're showing their "red carpet" smiles in these and for LA paps? When did they suddenly fall in love with the paparazzi? We also get blatant ring-flashing and the obligatory hand-holding. A lovely image, if you can believe it. I don't.
Blurg!- That reported sighting of Emily in the coffee shop is interesting. I also was not aware of photos of her arriving by herself at the airport. Hmmm. While your theory may seem "over the top", I'd really not put anything past publicists who, for reasons known only to them, appear desperate to keep these two in the press and the public eye.
Honestly at this point, everything this couple does seems to irritate me (unless it's break up). If they look pissed I think things might be rocky and if they look happy I think it's pr so I don't really know what to say now.
With Emily looking so cozy with several gentlemen at Cannes and then sighted having dinner and drinks until well past eleven on a Friday night (leaving her fiance alone) I just think it's all bs. I'm sorry, I just can't think of a lot of reasons why the dinner with another guy, etc is appropriate. Sure it could be a colleague, friend, etc but come on. I'm pretty sure my boyfriend would go through the roof if I tried to pull that kind of thing and I'm not rocking and$85K engagement ring from him.
The coffeeshop sighting is also confusing. She was getting coffee in LA on Wednesday and then arriving in LA on Thursday (with luggage) from NYC.
I wonder if John's coming back for Jenna Fischer's wedding? It would be an excellent way to get an oh-so-cute Emily/John story.
If this is true, know that I throw my hands up in the air in disgust!
http://www.facebook.com/permalink.php?story_fbid=129716023717015&id=6740548081
Lots of ranting from me this morning. Think I'm taking the week off from these shenanigans.
Crazy, you facebook link doesn't work. What does it say? I'm scared to think about it.
Blurg, your theory may seem over the top to some people, but I'd not put anything past the two of them now. They seem so - extra, you know? That is definitely her suitcase she's wheeling, but that means absolutely nothing to me. It wouldn't surprise me if they planned it so that it looked like she arrived with him, but she arrived a few days before. There were no sightings of her sicne that mysterious dinner on Friday night - with that random guy. Which, like you said crazy, even if it was a friend, your fiance can still come along.
Somehow I doubt he's returning to get married - there is absolutely sweet F all tying them to LA except work, for them to get married there just seems like a load of bs... like everything they do ;)
I'm so with you guys though. Whatever they do is grating on me. All the cutsie pics just scream PR to me. Both of them are so heavily managed, nothing would shock me with them to be honest!
It was a tweet from a wedding site that when you click on it goes to a random fb posting.
http://twitter.com/weddingshoppe
Had a look, think tha's BS :)
They might be in town for Jenna Fischer's wedding. She just had her bachelorette party and said in an interview that her mother and her fiance's mother met on mother's day weekend because it was very close to her wedding date and the parents had to meet.
I would think that if John and Emily were getting married over the weekend, at least one of them would have had to arrive sooner to finish up last minute details.
Upping the ante with the pdas a little over a week after Emily's private dinner. Coincidence?
http://johnkrasinski.net/index.php/2010/06/19/john-emily-out-and-about-in-la/
Is it just me, or do their arms around each other look really uncomfortable? You know when you're a teenager and your Dad puts his arm around you when you're out? And you don't really know where to put your arm? They look like that, especially with her arm thrown over his shoulder - unnatural!!
They look like a right pair or try hard numpties. They go from virtually no body contact, to PDA overload. What are we going to have next? Pics of them making out in the back of their car? (God help me!!!)
I just think this is a great move by their PR people, especially after her dinner ate with another guy made it in to the press.
FOOLS!
I agree Eugenie, they look very stiff and awkward. Ever since that crushable article and the dinner sighting, the current state of their relationship reminds me of right before Brad Pitt and Jennifer Aniston broke up. They had decided they were going to split and then went on vacation. Lots of cozy pics followed break-up rumors and wouldn't you know it, they announced their separation days later.
http://www.people.com/people/archive/article/0,,20146636,00.html
I outright laughed when I saw that photo. I swear Webster's Dictionary should have that photo next to the word "awkward".
I was going to say that she looked like she had twisted her ankle and needed help walking, but I like Eugenie's example much better! ;)
I don't even want to think about what other PDA's we'll be seeing soon. On second thought, bring them on. I need a good laugh. It also appears that their "love" for the paps has dwindled a bit in these pics. Not as "smiley".
Yes, they seemed to love the pap attention at LAX ;)
I totally thought of Ben and Jen, and God, How I wish this was the same. They DO seem really awkward and uneasy. And their level of PDA is deternined by how weel their being perceived in the press at the time. Rumours flying - they hold hands, rent fucking stupid bicycles at the beach.
I so laughed at your comment about looking like she twisted her ankle, it definitely looks like she needs help walking with the way he's gripping her ;) It just reminds me of when I used to go out with my dad, and I was about 13 and felt really akward about where to put my hands, in case anyone thought he was my older bf LMAO.
Break up break up break up *does the break up dance*
What confuses me with this couple is that they are trying to appear like such a down to earth/anti-Hollywood type of couple, yet whenever rumors start circulating we instantly get some sort of public outing or photo-op that with a kind of "in your face haters" quality. When we commented that things looked rocky when they went to the movies we got a report a few days later that they were all giggles in the theater. We comment that it looks like she hides her ring and then a series of photos is posted with a headline about Emily showing off her bauble or something like that.
If you scroll through the posts on this board, whenever there is a kind of "oh shit. I think they're gonna break-up any day now" type of conversation, it is almost immediately followed by a super cutesy new sighting, appearance, or something that screams "we're still so totally in love."
I would expect a pr-fuled relationship from a more famous couple but I guess one factor in becoming a star these days is creating interest and buzz around your personal life.
I've been lurking ever since this blind was revealed on NYD, and I just wanted to jmp in and say I agree with you all. As I was reading your last post crazy766, I kept thinking, "wow, that's what I think too." They're all for show. Whenever they get bad press of ANY sort, they put on their little show for us.
Like someone else said, this really reminds me of the whole Jennifer Aniston and Brad Pitt fiasco. Let's just hope this one has as "happy an ending," for all of us.
John seems different to me now, and not in a good way. He needs to get his head out of his ass if you ask me. He may be a big T.V star, but that means nothing in showbiz. He seems to think he's far bigger than he is. I never used to get that from him. But he reeks more and more of an egotistical Hollywood butt munch as time goes on.
My question is, why are they in the news so much? Neither one of them is A-List.
Granted they are both talented and good looking but...
This is Much ado about nothing IMO.
Welcome, MillyMollyMandy. Thanks for your post.
Crazy766, you've brought in some excellent examples of why, contrary to how these two portray themselves in the media as the types who "shun" the spotlight, actually take part in the PR game.
I realize that their publicists are only doing their job, but publicists work for the actors, and are paid a percentage out of the actor's earnings. If the actor is uncomfortable with the amount of attention they receive, isn't it the actor's responsibility to request the publicist "tone it down"?
RM- ITA with you. Neither of them is A list, yet you'd not know it based on the barrage of items we've been hit with since they started dating. Seems strange that there's so much focus on them as an engaged couple. Shouldn't the focus be on their work and what they bring to the table as a professional actor?
ITA with you pretzel. I just read an article where someone was interviewing Jenna Fischer. How refreshing! What a difference in tone and professionalism from both the interviewer and Jenna.
The journalist are playing us readers for chumps. I don't want to see numerous pictures and read numerous articles about John Krasinski and his pet rearing habits. Either he's walking his dog, picking up his poo or buying him something at the pet store.
Those kinds of articles and recycled articles about the two of them tying the knot "any day now", "soon", by their "rumored close friend" make me roll my eyes.
Hate to belabor the point but, have you noticed on some of the Internet web pages they advertise what clothes they are wearing?
I think it's Pop Sugar. You can place your mouse on the picture and they tell you what brand of clothing they are wearing and the cost.
If that's not a publicity shot, I don't know what is.
I agree RM. I think it all boils down to publicity. They get a lot of exposure together for their 'cuteness' as they will with their inevitable breakup.
Some of the other blogs like popsugar and justjared definitely seem to cater to publicists, particularly those trying to create buzz for not quite A list stars. For example, Justjared usually posts at least one Rachel Bilson entry a day and people are constantly commenting that she's not working and the posts are not newsworthy, just like the posts of John picking up dog poop.
With the engagement, Emily got a lot of additional press when she was campaigning for an Oscar nod and John's gotten a lot of cutesy sound bites for his fangirls. It's a big game and a game that some of John's colleagues (like Jenna) don't seem to be into quite yet.
crazy766 we never saw this kind of poo when John was dating Rashida. I guess if he wants to swim in Emily's pond, this is the kind of crap he has to put up with.
:P
I'm enjoying the new comments but want to ask you others a side question: This will be post #362 on this thread. Do you guys think Enty is aware of how long this particular BI comment thread has been going strong? I'm personally amazed! :)
@pretzel logic, I too am amazed at the way this one just won't die. Enty must be made aware.
Oh, I know he does, Blurg! I just get a little greedy. I just wish he'd throw us something a little more substantial. He is on record here at CDAN for predicting that they'd never marry. I was really hoping for some comment on the out-of-character "smilefest" with the paps at LAX last week, but nada!
No longer on E!'s "Weddings We Can't Wait For" list? E! probably got sick of all the jerking around with the "impending" month and moved on. Perhaps they can shot for the "Weddings that might happen in the Future...maybe" list. What I found funny was that Michael Buble' and his fiance made the list. Ouch!
I almost fell off my chair laughing that Buble made the list, and they didn't. Just goes to show people don't really care, or have no faith in them ;)
I was sent this by a friend earlier today, and it bugged the crap out of me. I honestly didn't think I could dislike her anymore, but this did it. I find the way she talks about her country to be disrespectful. She seems to pick and choose when she wants to be patriotic. And then when she is being "patriotic," she calls us a repessive country. I understand we're more private than the US, but calling us repressed is a piss take in my opinion. And does she love or hate Los Angeles? She needs to make up her fucking mind.
I'mstill baffled by the pictures from the other day. The way she had her arm thrown over his shoulder - as though she needed the support...
Emily Blunt misses the "repression" of England.
The Wild Target actress confesses she misses living in England, now that she spends much of her time in Los Angeles, and never wants to be seen to have "abandoned" her home country.
She said: "There's sometimes a tall poppy syndrome, especially now that I'm living in, God forbid, Los Angeles, doing American movies.
"I don't want it ever to appear that I've abandoned my country, because that's not how I feel. I miss England very much. I miss the sense of humour and I miss the repression, I miss it a lot."
The 27-year-old beauty also admits she had "no intention" of going into the acting profession, and believes herself to be lucky to have found work.
She told Culture: "I had no intention of acting. Not that I want to sound cavalier about the fact that I'm lucky enough to do it, but I never had that burning ambition. What the hell else I would do now, I have no idea. I'm utterly unqualified to do anything else, so I'm thrilled it all worked out."
http://home.nzcity.co.nz/news/article.aspx?ID=116300
Eugenie,
Do you think the Queen can fire her insubordination the way Obama fired General McChrystal?
Seriously, sorry to hear that you found her words to be offensive.
Me too Eugenie. : (
Now I'm laughing at those awkward walking photos. So.... unnatural. So uncomfortable looking and clingy.
@pretzel logic- I am always hoping that Enty will comment on the latest batch of fake, excuse me, cute photos with some insider bit of info.
I know, crazy766! So many of those pics just seem odd and often out of character from what we usually see, I'd think Enty would jump on them. Oh well. Maybe soon?
In the awkward walking pics of them leaving the restaurant, I wondered whether she needed John's assistance. Maybe one too many margaritas at El Coyote? ;)
HA, wouldn't that be awesome if the Queen ould get on board. Send her to the Tower ;) I just think she shows no respect for her country and that makes me sad!
I too have often wondered if Enty is aware of this threads continuing commentary. He must know. Like one of you said, he takes little digs at them in the random pictures sometimes.
In other news. Emily today. She looks like she's wearing a garden rubbish bag (green and massive)
http://img251.imagevenue.com/img.php?image=22931_big_emily_blunt_6759_122_176lo.jpg
http://img192.imagevenue.com/img.php?image=22942_big_emily_blunt_6760_122_438lo.jpg
http://img262.imagevenue.com/img.php?image=22951_big_emily_blunt_6761_122_143lo.jpg
http://img12.imagevenue.com/img.php?image=22962_big_emily_blunt_6762_122_199lo.jpg
http://img162.imagevenue.com/img.php?image=22972_big_emily_blunt_6763_122_113lo.jpg
Is it just me, or does she not have her ring on? She's not currently working, and you couldn't go to the gym in that "gorgeous" ensamble....
Thank you for those very, uh, interesting pics, Eugenie.
Let's see..
We have Emily walking away from a barefoot fellow who is turned away from the camera and who is clearly not John.
Emily is shooting looks at the photog that could drop a bull elephant at fifty paces.
Emily dressed in something unfashionable, but easy to get into (or out of).
Emily clearly ringless in at least two shots.
Nothing to see here folks. Move along. ;)
Wowzer! 3 things:
1) Emily is most definitely not wearing her engagement ring. She is also not working out nor is she filming so the usual excuses for why she's not wearing her ring aren't applicable here.
2) Since she's getting into her car (looking INCREDIBLY pissed) I'm assuming she's in LA while John's filming in NYC.
3) It really looks like she's leaving some dude's house. It could be totally innocent but if this blind wasn't revealed, I think it would have revealed itself in time. In the past month it does seem like Emily has been entertaining numerous men other than her fiance.
Oh, and John better get home soon because we're coming up on the last week of June! The wedding of the year if right around the corner!
John's back in LA isn't he? So this just makes it even more confusing.
Emily is more certainly NOT wearing her engagement ring, she looks proper pissed off to have been snapped. And the barefoot brother in the back is NOT John. She is not working, not working out... it just seems suspicious to me.
On a not needed bitchy note, what the hell s with that outfit? That dress is not flattering (no matter how small you may be...) and the shoes do not go. It's tragic.
John will be going back to the office in three weeks. Wonder if they were missed off that list of E's for a reason...
A girl in NYC tweeted that she was pissed because her mother had just met John. Mom could have been in LA but....?
My mom just met john krasinski WTF I WANNA MEET HIM SO BADDDD WTH
about 2 hours ago via UberTwitter
I know I said that I wasn't going to keep bringing up tweets but I definitely failed on that note.
Hmm, SB has definitely wrapped, and he flew in to LA last week. Does the twitter say where the girl is bassed in her profile?
So, interesting. He could be out of town and she's there in LA, shaking it up with other men.
Oh, interesting. I had a look and she is from NYC.
Girls. Girls. Girls.
You've headed off into the wrong territory. Emily was returning to her car after a visit to Amy Adams and her new baby. A French website published one of those photos on Wednesday.
http://www.purepeople.com/article/quand-la-magnifique-emily-blunt-rend-visite-a-la-jeune-maman-amy-adams_a58572/1
The headline roughly translates to When the magnificent Emily Blunt pays a visit to new mother, Amy Adams
As to her being without her engagement ring, Emily or John probably delivered it to the jeweller to be cleaned and soldered to the wedding ring for the upcoming ceremony.
People here don't really soulder their engagement rings to their wedding rings, so I can't really comment on that. It's not something I have really heard of. I find that a strange thing to do though, what if one of your rings needs cleaning/fixing etc?
I just find it weird that it's Amy Adams' house - yet I have never seen a picture of Amy Adams outside her own house (and I check for pictures of Amy daily as I'm a huge fan.) They seem to always catch Amy out and about, and never once at home. You'd think they would have, especially if they (the paps) know where she lives and are able to get close enugh etc. A picture of her baby must be worthquite a bit, as I don't think anyone has snapped a picture of her yet.
I still find it odd if you ask me.
A group of photographs showing Amy Adams and her baby were published this week.
http://www.popsugar.com/Pictures-Amy-Adams-Darren-Le-Gallo-Celebrating-Fathers-Day-Daughter-Aviana-Olea-Le-Gallo-8863524
This article says that Amy's boyfriend, Darren Le Gallo, bought a house on Benedict Canyon Drive at the end of last year.
http://realestalker.blogspot.com/search?q=amy+adams
The last of the comments made in responding to that article gives a real estate link to the exact home address number - 1368.
http://www.postrain.com/cb/1368benedict/
Part of the number 1368 is shown in one of your photographs.
http://img12.imagevenue.com/img.php?image=22962_big_emily_blunt_6762_122_199lo.jpg
A photograph from the real estate slide show shows the same kind of mailbox as in one of the photographs you attached. The house number is also printed on the curb.
http://i940.photobucket.com/albums/ad246/nosygirl03/Picture3.png
I did some research and it is a common practice to solder the engagement ring to the wedding band. Usually it is recommended that you do it a week prior to the wedding.
All we have to do is wait a week or two. By then they should be married.
The timing's about right. They can get married this weekend and go on their honeymoon and John will be back in time for filming the Office.
Nosygirl, thank you for your sleuthing. However, something's not adding up. If you take a look at the picture of Amy Adam's house there are no mailboxes right next to the driveway. The house mailbox matches but, where did the 1374 mailbox come from? And there is another mailbox beside it. Also, the place where the number is sprayed on the curb is different as well. In the real-estate picture you posted the house number is sprayed right next to the driveway. In this picture with Emily and Darren Le Gallo (Compare the back of his head on those Father's Day pictures and the back of the head of our mystery man) the house number is sprayed farther back and there is a break in the curb. What I mean by that is there is curb a little break where Emily is walking out and more curb. You don't see that on the real-estate picture.
Granted the mailboxes match though.
Is this the barefoot man in Emily's pic?
http://www.popsugar.com/Pictures-Amy-Adams-Baby-8863502?page=0,0,8#8
RM, I responded to your comments at the more recent Emily article.
http://www.crazydaysandnights.net/2010/06/emily-blunt-ringless-and-leaving-guys.html
Yes,
Thanks nosygirl. I read the post but, can't bring myself to look at the google map because then I will feel like I actually went to Amy's house and that makes me feel uncomfortable. Thank you for your sleuthing and your explanation though. It makes sense.
If they get married in the next two weeks I will believe her ring was being soldered otherwise, I think they broke up or she's not as faithful as you think she is.
What we know is that she and Darren Le Gallo were photographed leaving his house on June 22 and that she was not wearing her engagement ring.
What that means.... time will tell.
The ring is back...
http://img240.imagevenue.com/img.php?image=98675_eblunt062610_01_122_2lo.JPG
http://img255.imagevenue.com/img.php?image=98679_eblunt062610_02_122_224lo.JPG
http://img168.imagevenue.com/img.php?image=98718_eblunt062610_03_122_365lo.JPG
http://img197.imagevenue.com/img.php?image=98764_eblunt062610_04_122_500lo.JPG
http://img190.imagevenue.com/img.php?image=98806_eblunt062610_05_122_541lo.JPG
http://img173.imagevenue.com/img.php?image=98853_eblunt062610_06_122_4lo.JPG
http://img215.imagevenue.com/img.php?image=98870_eblunt062610_07_122_610lo.JPG
http://img207.imagevenue.com/img.php?image=98884_eblunt062610_08_122_164lo.JPG
http://img223.imagevenue.com/img.php?image=98927_eblunt062610_09_122_623lo.JPG
http://img147.imagevenue.com/img.php?image=98960_eblunt062610_10_122_74lo.JPG
http://img199.imagevenue.com/img.php?image=99012_eblunt062610_11_122_524lo.JPG
http://img225.imagevenue.com/img.php?image=99039_eblunt062610_13_122_805lo.JPG
Back to the ring souldering, that is so unusual - maybe not for you guys in the US, but here it's not really a dne thing. Is there a reason for it? Just curious now :)
nd NG, thanks for the pics, They looks really similar to me, but like RM said, there is there is ittle break where Emily is walking out and more curb. You don't see that on the real-estate pictures and the mailbox seems to be in a different place, and you can't see the number etc. But who knows.
Who knows.
I'm sorry if you felt like I was jumping down your throat. We are all entitled to believe what we want.
Thanks Eugenie! I'm assuming these were taken on the same day as the pics without the ring? Same dress but taken later in the day after she put her engagement ring back on? She could have dropped the ring off and then headed to mystery man's house as well. Not sure how we know the first round of pics was taken in the morning.
If these were taken later in the week and she's just wearing the same outfit we know she wasn't having her ring soldered Tuesday.
Did the photographer zoom in on purpose to check if her ring was connected to a wedding band?
Well, it appears the "soldered ring" theory has been blow to sh*t.
Yeppers Pretzels. It does indeed.
FYI the pic with the engagement ring on was snapped on June 26 according to this article.
http://x17online.com/celebrities/emily_blunt/ms_blunt_flashes_her_engagement_bling-06272010.php
Also, there's another article in that French website that reported she was visiting Amy Adams on June 22. Only this time they are chastising her for wearing the same dress twice in one week.
I think it's funny that this photo agency is the same one that posted this article "Emily flaunts her bauble".
http://x17online.com/celebrities/emily_blunt/emily_blunt_flaunts_her_big_bauble-03012010.php
Like this recent batch of pictures, this article was also posted after we had been discussing several ring/no ring shots and wondering why she had been wearing her ring low and hiding it on the Wolfman press tour.
I was surprised to see yesterday's date on those photos. Like you, crazy, I assumed they were taken at another point in the day on the 22nd. She's dressed exactly as she was on Tuesday, even down to the hideous sandals.
We can probably rule out a cleaning as well. My friend pointed out that you can have a ring cleaned while you wait and if you go to the jeweler where the ring was purchased, it's often done as a courtesy. So we come back to the question, why no ring?
I was actually comparing the two sets and there are some very small differences. In the second set she has brown sunglasses, no bracelets on her right hand, and a gray purse with studs. In the first set however, she has a gray bag but no stud detailing, no bracelets, and appears to be carrying black sunglasses.
There is probably an innocent explanation for not wearing her ring Tuesday but there are also a number of not so innocent reasons especially since she remembers to wear the ring out when her fiance is back in town.
You've got me there, crazy766. I shouldn't have stated "exactly". Will almost exactly do? ;)
Could it be she's done this before? Got caught without her ring, puts it on and have a pap take a picture of her with it on wearing the same outfit hoping we will think it's the same day?
I'm so totally starting to believed this whole thing is one big fat lie!!!
Oh, RM! You read my mind. I seriously thought that earlier today but was a bit leery to put that thought out there. Glad you went first! ;)
Well, nothing juicy but here's another puff piece making the rounds. These guys are smart though. They're not saying a wedding any day now, but "later in the year". Wise choice, guys.
http://www.nationalledger.com/ledgerpop/article_272632779.shtml
Sorry! I didn't mean to sound nit picky! : )
Ha. I bet she freaked out and put on the same (nasty) clothes, hoping to confuse everyone.
I'm becomming more and more confused by them each day.
Say that WAS Amy's house. Her ring was not being souldered, I just still find it odd she wasn't wearing it...
Well, it looks like they're going through with it. Congratulations?
http://www.people.com/people/article/0,,20397695,00.html
That's a very nice sentiment, crazy766. I'm going to hold on to mine until I see some photographic evidence or read an official announcement.
Sorry to seem so coldly cynical, but we've been bombarded with so many of these "it's going to happen any day now" stories, I'm afraid I've become immune.
While there very well may be some truth to this, just reading the gossip press releases just has me wondering if it's just more of the same. E! online's account reads differently from People's detail-wise. Hell, the San Francisco Chronicle has Blunt hosting her own party. Since when does the bride-to-be host her own bachelorette party? Isn't she the guest of honor and it's hosted by her maid-of-honor or best friend?
Just seems like each of these news sources is writing and editing their own versions of the story.
The story of she and John having dinner the night before at Chateau Marmont? BFD! They're always being seen there. It's like their McDonald's. ;)
I'm cynical as well Pretzel.
July 10 is supposed to be the big day according to In Touch. I'm a little skeptical though.
http://www.starpulse.com/news/index.php/2010/07/01/july_10th_is_celebrity_wedding_day
Did anyone else find it a little odd that on the day of her bachelorette party she was out and about shopping by herself. I thought she might fly in some of her close girlfriends or maybe her sister and she would be entertaining them and what not? Just me?
Anyway, all of the Bachelorette party stories stem from the one People story which could have easily come from a publicist. Isn't People known for catering to publicists?
Post a Comment