Tuesday, October 12, 2010

Do You Remember When Kim Kardashian Said She Regretted Posing Nude?


I think it was about a month or maybe six weeks ago when Playboy released more nude photos of Kim Kardashian that she said she did not realize there were more naked photos of her and she regretted ever posing nude in the first place. Uh huh. What makes her words even more hollow sounding is that she probably had already posed nude for this month's issue of W Magazine. Not nude as in hiding essential body parts, but nude, as in hey look at every inch of my body please. The picture above only hints at what is inside. Basically, Kim is painted to look like the Silver Surfer but is wearing no clothes. I guess she just wants to remind the world how she got started in show business. I also can't believe W put her on the cover.

26 comments:

nicola said...

I love the full nude pic. You can see the breast implant that she swears she doesn't have.

.robert said...

Butt and class at an inverse ratio.

Seachica said...

Ewww, she looks so plastic-y.

Baka Neko said...

Glad Kim's staying classy. At the same time though, what else can she really do that would make her interesting?

delilah said...

it's official:
W jumped the shark

Patty said...

Her deceased father would have been so proud to see his baby turn into a soft porn star.

MISCH said...

When will this Ho go away...gee enough already. Shame on you W.

Hendrix said...

What breaks my heart is that average teens like my own want to grow up and be like her - as in, rich, with unlimited fame and attention. To them, it looks like she has the best life ever.

Media, stop glorifying these leeches. They do nothing to add to society; they are the lowest common denominator.

PotPourri said...

Whore.

0 said...

"The ART Issue, Starring Kim Kardashian"

Van Gogh, Monet, da Vinci, Munch, Botticelli, Michaelangelo, Warhol and many others are somewhere laughing their asses off today.

penelope said...

IMHO her father is rolling over in his grave so often, he's dizzy.

Unknown said...

I have no idea how modeling works, but did Playboy pay her a one time thing but had rights to publish her photos later as they wanted? If that's the case, I think she needs to tweek her statement to be that she will pose nude for a direct share in the $$$. Why won't this family go away?

Linnea said...

This is just the weirdest thing ever. I repeat what O said- the ART issue? Are you kidding me??

Also, did u see the pics inside? They are even worse.

jess said...

hahahaha...ART

skeeball said...

they use the word "art" to try and fool us into thinking the magazine is not full of pictures of a slut

Anonymous said...

Her body looks weird.

mooshki said...

I always admired W for really being about fashion, but they have now sunk way lower than Vogue.

RocketQueen said...

Enough with this family. They're not worthy. Who the hell is shocked about her hypocrisy? No one.

parissucksliterally said...

I seriously did not think it was possible for me to detest someone more than Paris.

Kim wins.

RJ said...

W magazine:Art :: ABC's dancing show:Stars

Murphy Brown 2020 said...

Honestly, though, what makes her so slutty? Is she known for banging lots of dudes? And if that's the case, can we start referring to people like Clooney as whores, because he seems to enjoy women who aren't half as classy as Kim.

My point: I know she's a total idiot, but I think that she's be called a whore less often if she were skinnier and had a less overtly-sexy figure. I'm honestly GLAD that someone with a gigantic ass is a sex symbol!

Whatever. Nudity pops up everywhere nowadays. Americans need to honestly just get over it.

And I think she's gorgeous. I hate to think it, but I do.

Murphy Brown 2020 said...

Also, COME ON!! She CANNOT be more detestable than fucking PARIS!!

ardleighstreet said...

She posed as the Silver Surfer? Forget her daddy rolling over in his grave. How dare she make Jack Kirby roll over in his grave.

(He did not create Norrin Radd so some tartlet could "class up" her porn and pose as the Silver Surfer)

Yeah, I'm a geek like that. ;)

dbfreak said...

I have to agree with amoteafloat. I've read a couple of books about the slut label and one of the theories is that kids tag girls that are more "developed" as being a slut regardless of actual sexual behavior. I know it happened to me in both middle school and high school when I was still a virgin.

Tatyana said...

Posing nude (or painted over) doesn't make one a whore. Texting in a movie theater and only stopping after being pelted with M&Ms is pure assholeness.

karen said...

I don't think that women call women like Kim Kardashian a whore or a slut (or even worse; a cunt) because she's so curvy. I think women use to call other women sluts and whores etc. to distance themselves from those kinds of women and the poor light they seem to cast on women in general. If a man does something stupid, despicable or embarrassing he's mostly judged by his actions alone and it doesn't affect men in general. If a woman does something like that it often reflects badly on other women too. That's why women tend to be so harsh to each other and that's why there's no solidarity among women which, for me, is the main reason why we still don't have equal rights.

Advertisements

Popular Posts from the last 30 days