Your Turn
How many magazines do you subscribe to?
Advertisements
Popular Posts from the last 30 days
-
This stay young "serum" that was all the rage a decade or so ago among actresses in Hollywood is why they now have the debilitatin...
-
September 11, 2020 This wannabe rapper A list mogul was on a yacht off the coast of France and sent someone to get a goat. A live goat. I...
-
This former A list actress was in a massive franchise. She was not happy to go backstage and see one of her co-stars on her knees servicing ...
-
The alliterate one wants a huge launch for her company next month. She wants to time it with the overseas visit of her husband so he will be...
-
A national sports reporter says she was sexually assaulted after a recent award show and it involves an A+ list celebrity.
-
This one named singer had a massive hot right before COVID hit. She thought she was the bomb. As she is discovering, the industry will throw...
-
This permanent A list NBA player is set to come out of the closet.
-
This foreign born former soap star turned sex worker is trying her hardest to get pregnant with the baby of this offspring of a permanent A+...
-
March 29, 2024 You would think the former A list actress who played an iconic television character could afford a better plastic surgeon who...
-
This former dual threat A list actress and all around great person doesn't want to use the weekly shot to lose weight. She wants to prov...
21 comments:
Zero
It's "National Puppy Day" and that's your "Your Turn"?!?!?!
^^ Same.
Although, I will admit....I still love to hold and read a real book w/ pages as opposed to using my kindle. =/
So true. We could have had the CUTEST Your Turn ever!
Zero. I used to but it's all just ads with not much content. No need for them anymore anyway.
3 subscriptions to aspirational magazines because i'm a masochist. and 5 adorable elderly puppies who are what life is really about.
Just one, but my wife subscribes to a bunch of women's magazines.
Two, but they're both comped.
"0"
Because Publishers Clearing House keeps promising that I could win, and i never do.
So, in retaliation, I don't subscribe to any magazines.
Years ago, I subscribed to "Mad Magazine." But, I got tired of the repeated bad jokes,
I used to subscribe to numerous magazines. Food, architecture, fashion, etc. Two years ago I took a look at my bookshelves and said to myself, "You are two magazines short of being a hoarder! Enough!" Cancelled them all.
Lucky Peach.
That is all. I used to get ArtNews and Architectural Digest but didn't renew my subscriptions.
Only from my professional association. The articles all seem to the the same month in and out.
Rolling Stone, and that's it, maybe will consider Vanity Fair, but most of them u can read 1/2 the issue for free online anyways, so what's the point anymore?
I the last one was 1999...
6, but I'm letting Glamour and Cosmopolitan lapse since they are now apparently aimed at giddy middleschoolers.
Which will leave Viz (hilarious!), Self (health and fitness), Kiplinger's Retirement Report, and Bottom Line (various little hacks and "did you know" tidbits.
None. I shut everyone out because I don't want to get hurt.
People fool you. You think you're going to read an interview that will empower childless women, but what you get instead is all your old wounds reopened and peppered with salt because you get to watch how neurotypicals function and just feel further pressured to have children. Thank you.
I purchased something on-line from a very reputable business. After the end of the transaction there was a survey. If I responded, I could choose six - 6! - subscriptions for FREE! Well, naturally I did respond and selected the six magazines. I'm going through my credit card bill and discover to my HORROR that two of the magazines have charged my account $90 each. Beware celebrity magazines!
I'm glad the last disappointing article I read was for free on a proper non-scammy free-trial (considering how much it ended up hurting me and reopening old wounds). I just can't understand how these "feminist" magazines can do their business like this. I mean, when you run a "childless" edition (meaning women who can't have children will come and read the issue expecting to feel empowered) and some interviewer starts going off-rail and directs the conversation to territories that make readers feel pressured to conform instead, it's a double dick move: First from the interviewer (who possibly went rogue) and then a second dick move from the editors who didn't edit it out. It seems more important for the editors to sell copies (and click-bait) rather than actually sell an idea what tolerant, pro-women "values" they stand for.
Most big-name media outlets are just riding on their own past glories anyway. And then they get arrogant and don't bother with quality control. I hope the attention and magazine sales were worth it.
One.
w/ u: have 1 (no room for more!!!!) 6 y.o. puppy who is cute, smart, friendly & funnnnny....
lifts my spirit up every gloomy morning...
Rolling Stone & Vanity Fair
Post a Comment