Saturday, August 11, 2018

Blind Items Revealed #7 - Mr. Hedge

April 11, 2018

Looks like that convicted pedophile photographer I keep talking about is back selling pictures online.

Somehow the sites allow this to take place. They claim if it's not nudity, then it's not illegal.   Even though it's clearly exploitative and oriented towards pedophiles.   This creep has been around forever. 

Bob Villard

16 comments:

LEANNE NORMAN said...

We really need sentence reform for paedophiles world wide, most can't be rehabilitated and will offend again, the only answer is life in prison to stop the constant cycle of reoffending.

orangesoda said...

First of all, why is this fuck allowed to do this? Second, why aren't we getting the information of the sick fucks buying this and locking them up?
Leanne is right. They cannot be rehabilitated. Life in prison isn't the answer, though. That costs tax payers too much. You touch a kid or you look at pictures or videos of others touching kids, you should die.

J said...

DID THEY CALL THE POLICE

Cail Corishev said...

He's probably allowed to do it for the reason the blind suggests: it's not illegal. Very little is anymore since we got rid of general decency laws. If it's fetish stuff like pictures of kids' feet, with nothing that's technically illegal, there may not be anything authorities can do.

orangesoda said...

Ugh. It's disgusting to see what's happening to our morals. In Japan it's legal to sell photographs of kids as young as three in 'sexy' positions as long as their privates are covered. I guess this is where we're heading too.

DooDooBrown said...

I initially misread that as Bob Villa and I almost choked.
I couldn't go on if Bob Villa was a pedo.

LEANNE NORMAN said...

Isn't there laws to stop convicted paedophiles from being around children. I know some states don't allow them to live within a certain distance of a school. So surely he can't work with children even if the material isn't technically illegal.

SteveD said...

I think he was selling pics from old photoshoots.

J F said...

Thank God they set the cut off at 3 yrs... wouldn't want those 2 1/2 y/o's posing provocatively

Jon Feltman said...

He is a top pedo monster, still protected because of what he knows. If and when the SHTF for these evil fucks and their cohorts/colleagues/heads of state/CEOs/royals etc, he will be dead within hours. The cone of silence is beginning to crack, shouldn't be too much longer now...DO YOU HEAR ME plot? Cringela?

mike m said...

plot has no problem with pedophiles, she thinks it's just a big conspiracy theory.

William Clayton said...

Most people are under the false impression that pedophile sex offenders have a very high recidivism rate. In fact, there are only a few crimes with a lower recidivism rate than sex offenses: murder, espionage, and treason. The vast majority of sex offenders offend against either a family member or someone close. These people rarely re-offend. The ones with the high recidivism rate are same sex pedophiles that have gone after strangers or that work with a lot of children. Those are particularly dangerous and likely to re-offend and they skew the numbers. The whole "stranger danger" thing is blown way out of proportion - maybe a dozen (I know, still a dozen too many) of those (kidnap/rape/murder) a year in the entire country. Almost all missing children are taken by the non-custodial parent, usually the father (that often gets frivorce-raped).

Marshall Mathers said...

So plot is actually a woman? All this time I thought it was a guy. For some reason the postings just read that way to me.

Marshall Mathers said...

That all sounds like a steaming crock of shit, dude, but nice try. Sorry but there are few crimes worse or more damaging than those that hurt children and "most people" are right to be repulsed by such criminals. You sound like an apologist.

William Clayton said...

Marshall Mathers: I got most of this information from a lady that goes to my church who treats sex offenders. She's the "court mandated therapist" you hear about. The state I'm in has mandatory therapy for those on probation or parole for 3 years. I don't know if the numbers show that it works, I'm sure she would say that it has a measurable, positive effect, probably because she makes - I'm guessing here, $150K/yr on about a 25 hour work week. Pay her or go back to jail.

Anyhow, everything that she has told me - numbers-wise - if I have been able to look up, has been shown to be true.

And you are a dumbass that can't seem to read. I never said ANYTHING like or about how damaging sex crimes are to kids. Everyone knows that it's a horrifying betrayal of trust and causes permanent damage. I said NOTHING about what should be done to them as punishment/restitution. What I DID say was that the SCOPE of the problem is not what people think.

Your confirmation bias and virtue signalling are showing.

William Clayton said...

Should read: The state I'm in has mandatory therapy for 3 years for those on probation or parole.

LEANNE NORMAN: you are incorrect. See other comment. The ones you have to worry about are those that commit forcible rape against a stranger, any kind of abduction/sexual assault against a stranger - adult or child. I'm guessing that the reasoning is that there are a limited number of people you're close to, but a near infinite number of strangers. And apparently the recidivism rates bear this out.

BTW, what do you guys think about how all (90%+) of the teacher / student sexual misconduct cases these days are from female teachers? Everyone still want to have them summarily shot? Over half are married, and about 20% have children of their own. Is it OK if a woman does it?

Advertisement

Popular Posts from the last 30 days