Blind Item #4
Posted by
ent lawyer
at
7:30 AM
Labels: blind item
Crazy Days and Nights is a gossip site. The site publishes rumors, conjecture, and fiction. In addition to accurately reported information, certain situations, characters and events portrayed in the Blog are either products of the author’s imagination or are used fictitiously. Information on this site may contain errors or inaccuracies; the Blog’s proprietor does not make warranty as to the correctness or reliability of the site's content. Links to content on and quotation of material from other sites are not the responsibility of Crazy Days and Nights.
Cookies & 3rd Party Advertisements Google, as a third party vendor, uses cookies to serve ads on your site. Google's use of the DART cookie enables it to serve ads to your users based on their visit to your sites and other sites on the Internet. Users may opt out of the use of the DART cookie by visiting the Google ad and content network privacy policy. We allow third-party companies to serve ads and/or collect certain anonymous information when you visit our web site. These companies may use non-personally identifiable information (e.g., click stream information, browser type, time and date, subject of advertisements clicked or scrolled over) during your visits to this and other Web sites in order to provide advertisements about goods and services likely to be of greater interest to you. These companies typically use a cookie or third party web beacon to collect this information. To learn more about this behavioral advertising practice or to opt-out of this type of advertising, you can visit https://www.networkadvertising.org/managing/opt_out.asp.
31 comments:
JAvier bardem
And woody allen obviously
Or maybe, juuuuuuuust maybe, not everyone believes Mia. I don't.
So cheating on your spouse has equivalence to molesting children?
He really is unattractive, goes to show women have no standards.
No @Jl. He has strong Castilian feautures and is rugged/masculine.
@J
Yes, in Enty world.
I like uniquely handsome men, and Bardem is that.
I don't either, Krab.
Whether you believe her or not, she's on the hook for having kids with/raising kids around this guy. People with children should take some responsibility for keeping those kids away from monsters, you know?
more like Canary Island features ( it belongs yo Spain but it is geographically in Africa) There is little castilian about him.
Re Mia - I agree, J, it doesn't look good that she allowed the adoption of the 2 kids (Moses and Dylan) to go forward after she supposedly knew that WA was an abuser or at least did troubling things.
Hold on a second.
Mia did NOT allow the adoption of Dylan and Moses after she knew WA was abusing Dylan. WA was accused of molesting Dylan and she was adopted from birth by he and Mia.
I think the point is that Woody proved himself to be a bad parent to his kids in his court testimony, in custody cases brought by himself against Mia, btw. Mia might have been a bad parent but she cared enough to know all her children's teachers, doctors, dentists, schedules, hire all their tutors, provided them with food, schooling, medical necessities...and give them a life in a nice NYC apartment and a farm in Connecticut. Woody did not provide any of that, according to his own words, and didn't seem to think any of it mattered while testifying.
The custody case was decided on this basis alone and had nothing to do with the reported abuse.
People doubt Mia and Dylan. It's a slippery case, even thought every judge thought there was enough evidence to charge Woody. That still has no bearing on custody or the situation with Soon Yi (in which I am firmly in the camp that Woody stalked her and groomed her for years.)
I'm not saying that WA is a peado because he had sex with his step daughter but HE HAD SEX WITH HIS STEP DAUGHTER. Do the people defending him genuinely believe he waited until she was eighteen? I don't know much about Mia but I'll play Devil's Advocate here and go out on a limb and say that maybe she is fabricating. What would you do if you found your husband screwing your child? Adult or not, adopted or not, he's a sick little fuck.
Yet here we are. Not only are these 'celebs' defending these fuckers but us regular folk are buying into it, apparently.
Whether Allen was a terrible or great parent has little bearing on Farrow's responsibility for observing and carefully considering the people her children would be raised around. If he's such a monster (and he may well be, I have no idea), then how could she spend years and years with him without becoming concerned over that?
I mean, if she were stupid or irresponsible maybe... but we know that like all the accusers she's a saint.
@orange
Hell NO Woody didn't wait till Soon Yi was 18! If you read her latest interview she is extremely vague about when their "affair" started, can't seem to recall exactly. Then there are the reports from Daisy and Lark that Woody would ask for details of their teenaged dating experiences( together with Soon Yi), to "help" them navigate the world of boys. Yeah, I've heard that one before and I'm not alone.
@J
I'm sure Mia is well aware of her culpability in all this, why she ignored things because her main source of income and excellent work was Woody, and she had three children with him, and for her their relationship worked on many levels. A whole lot of women make the same compromises for much, much less. I bet it was devastating and very difficult to overcome, if she can at all.
But fortunately in this universe, people cannot be charged for the actions of others, so your condemnation of Mia has no legal bearing.
plot, I suspect you have no idea whatsoever what Mia Farrow is or is not aware of. Stick to people you know personally like Anthony Bourdain.
As for legal bearing, I'll continue having opinions of individuals and categories of people irrespective of prosecutability.
@Plot, J and Orangesoda, if you are tired of arguing about this, I suggest you guys take a break head on to youtube and watch a montage of Muarys, you are not the father! I bet it will crack you guys up!
If he was so easily guilty, why is he not in prison? The tribunals then said it was not true.
Seems to me that a good mother would keep her kids away from lots of people whose behavior was off, rather than using the threshold of illegality.
So spending a long time with this horrible horrible guy (again, I think he may well be) and then exposing children to him seems pretty damned irresponsible.
Of course, I'm an old-fashioned type who thinks people should put some energy into protecting kids, instead of just tipping off gossip bloggers after they've been abused.
@J, I get what you're saying, you'd think as soon as most mothers found those pics of Soon Yi they would have been reaching for a double-barreled or a baseball bat to deal with the bastard. But then again it's not a normal mother's experience to find out that the man she loves f*cked one of her daughters and might be trying to f*ck the other. Who can say how they'd react? In the end she did the right thing, some don't even do that.
@J
As I will continue to have opinions, and chuckle, over your inanity.
Oh yeah, for everybody (not J) trying to use the strategy of shifting the focus to Mia and ignoring the accounts of the Dylan, Ronan, caretakers, doctors, the New York Supreme Court Justice, here you go:
33-page decision from New York Supreme Court Justice Elliott Wilk in Woody Allen’s 1992 custody suit
Summary:
https://www.huffingtonpost.com/danny-shea/heres-the-1993-woody-alle_b_4746866.html
Full version:
https://www.scribd.com/document/205403621/Allen-v-Farrow-Custody-Ruling-June-7-1993
Hi Brayson!
Falling in love is great. But it's not an excuse for getting stupid, especially not for exposing vulnerable people to harm. If some person wants to stay in a relationship with black eyes and broken ribs because of "love," that's great (although I don't appreciate being told I need to do personally put energy into worrying about the outcome.)
However, toleration of kids getting black eyes and broken ribs because of "love" also happens, and as far as I'm concerned any parent who exposes kids to that treatment is a horrible person, even if "love" is involved. Farrow was with him for years. If she didn't gauge his personality and tendencies in that time, she wasn't attentive, or isn't bright enough to undertake the responsibilities of child-rearing.
@Brayson
Thanks so much for sharing that. More Allen defenders need to read it through.
Say what you want about him, his roles in The Counselor and No Country For Old Men just nailed me to the wall. Speaking of No Country, Tommy Lee Jones was never better. After you watch him in that film, watch The Eyes of Laura Mars from 40 years ago. He was gorgeous! Some people age better than others. What an actor! And, did you know, he was Al Gore's roommate in College? Now you do.
How unfortunate that @J hates women and supports pedophilia.
@A That's not what he said and you know it. Then again, maybe you don't...
Men can be obtuse when it comes to the behavior of other men. They compartmentalize stuff; women connect everything.
I don't think I've ever seen a more bleak movie than The Counselor. It's Cormac, whose a wonderful writer (most the time) but gosh that movie upset me in ways his writing never did.
"who is" not whose.
jesus christ, fuck me.
The body of Christ compels you!
Post a Comment