Wednesday, February 23, 2011

Life & Style Spends The Big Bucks


I cannot even count or remember all of the pregnant celebrities right now. I do know that 95% of them have a much higher celebrity than Kim Zolciak. So, it boggles the mind that out of anyone Life & Style could throw a few bucks at for almost naked pregnancy photos, they chose Kim. I mean seriously? Is your budget that small that all you can afford is Kim? Imagine you are at your checkout stand and this is not even about buying a magazine. This is just about which magazine you are going to pick up and flip through really quickly while you are waiting to check out. Is the one with Kim Zolciak the one you are going to pick up? And buying it? Forget about it. All this does is make the magazine look like they are some kind of third rate almost tabloid who can't land someone everyone knows. I know they are not going to snag Natalie Portman, but you would think they could get somebody besides Kim.

25 comments:

__-__=__ said...

My eyes!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

nunaurbiz said...

I bet Kim paid THEM! :-D

Robert said...

Who is Kim Zolciak?

WednesdayFriday said...

Robert, I am jealous of your ignorance.

Murphy Brown 2020 said...

LOL! What Lauren said. :-) I know who she is, and I don't even watch those shows.

MommaSaid said...

No.. I wouldnt even buy if Natalie Portman was on it. Been there done that twice. Celebrity pregnanies are no more special than mine were.

And yes @Nanaurbiz she probably paid THEM! LOL!

MommaSaid said...
This comment has been removed by the author.
Diane said...

I still think Kim is a man

Patty said...

I have to say she does look good, all things considered.

CDAN Mod said...

she's one successful gold-digging woman.

Murphy Brown 2020 said...

@Diane, I hadn't really considered it, but I think you're probably right.

Laura said...

Who???

Cancan said...

There are a million pregnant celebs and semi celebs and that's the best they could do? I know Jessica Alba wouldn't do it, but at least give us someone we would like to look at. Selma Blair, Ivanka Trump, etc.

bluebonnetmom said...

I am so glad I have not lost any brain cells watching any of the Real Housewives of _____ shows. The reason they got her is no other big time celebrity would do it. This is not Demi and Vanity Fair or whatever she was on.

RocketQueen said...

I just can't with that "hair".

selenakyle said...

Blecccchhh!

Robert said...

I don't know if it's a man, baby, but it looks like it used to be a man, baby!

VelvetStaccato said...

I think you hit the nail square on the head with the no budget for real stars theory. Seriously? Kim...a "celebrity"? Puhleeze...

ForSure said...

Thank you Rocket Queen! My goodness, I've known so many women who had fantastic hair during their pregnancy and this woman gets photographed with that horrid looking 'thing' on her head. I am completely over Christina, Paris, Britney and every other celeb with tacky, horrible, fake hair. Don't any of these people look at photos of themselves and see how silly they look?

Meg said...

Does Life & Style pay the people on the cover for the photos? I doubt they are a first pick publication for most real celebrities.

LOL @ Diane

Kim probably did pay THEM.

Natalie is out of place on that cover. They should have used some other reality star.

blue sky said...

I would love to know how bad her real hair is because the wigs aren't an improvement by any means! Fake!

Go away Kim - you gold-digging wh@re! Shame on any magazine for her putting her on the cover.

Merlin D. Bear said...

Ummm... just exactly *who* is she?
I thought to be a "celebrity", people at least had to know who you are...

scrappy said...

i want to know who on god's green earth believes she's 32.

RocketQueen said...

@scrappy. SERIOUSLY. I'm 35 and I swear I'm at least 7 years younger than this trick.

@FS - THANK YOU. I can't understand how she thinks that shizz looks natural!!

Monica said...

Kourtney Kardashian is pregnant again?

Advertisement

Popular Posts from the last 30 days