Sunday, March 26, 2017

Blind Items Revealed #7

March 15, 2017

Don’t believe the hype. The long lost daughter of this former singing couple (not together) is not lost. She is in the family and is well taken care of by her mother, although she calls someone else that term.

Janet Jackson/James DeBarge

22 comments:

bellebottomblues said...

so is the woman we've been seeing pics of on radar the daughter thats being 'taken care of"? or is she someone else?

Sd auntie said...

No!! Dna conclues that James is not the father. Thats a Billie Jean thing going on with that lady. The Debarge family is light skinned and this lady did not look like him. I knew that was not their kid. So fake that website.

JustReading said...

That creature is in no way related to a Jackson or DeBarge. JayZ, maybe

JustReading said...

I am getting the creepiest ads on this page today - looks like an 8 year old boy body builder. So gross!

just sayin' said...

hasn't it been rumored that this daughter is the actual mother of janet's new baby as well?

detnow359 said...

Her sister Reebie raised Janet's first child and she is the mother of the baby Janet is now saying is her first

Thia said...

You do realize that the ads are based on your own searches, right? The ads I'm seeing right now are for H&R Block (made my appointment online yesterday), pots and pans on Amazon (searched for those a few days ago), and far too much Gilmore Girl crap. So...JustReading...what HAVE you been searching? :D

kt said...

Bingo.

8====D KermitGosnellKnobjob said...

I wonder what I search that makes the ads believe that I want to learn Spanish or English (well, they may have a point with this second option).

OKay said...

I get that creepy kid too! And I honestly couldn't say what invokes it. I think it's for protein powder or vitamins or something, and I'm a medical transcriptionist so I do look up a lot of supplements online.

OKay said...

How twisted IS that family?

honey bunny said...

I can believe about her older sister raising the baby but to use her as a baby farm, no. Janet was pregnant with this child. The pics of her show that.

inga said...

BS: janet was really prego (w/ some fertility help maybe): huge stomach & hips/tights + a 'pregnant' face (some women know what im talking abt)...

Dannette said...

I could believe anything about the bizarro family. You must have missed the pics of super heavy Janet between tours over the years.

Elle said...

What a shame, own your truth Janet.

Sd auntie said...

Fake fat suit

Guesser said...

Some ads show up because of the content on this site. Fabletics has shown up when Kate Hudson is mentioned. Another site had a blind about someone hooking up with a ladyboy, a d the page was full of ads to find them! Others said it showed up on their pages as well.

bellebottomblues said...

There were only 2 pics of her during her entire "pregnancy" one was in London all wrapped up in coats etc and the other was in People magazine where she didnt even sit down for an interview/pics. All she did was give them a photoshopped pic and a statement.
Just seems shady, we dont care how she has a baby, surrogate, ivf, adoption, its still ypur child that you will raise/love. Dont get all the secrecy. And yes, she he has yoyo'ed with her weight since she was young.

Ever Duchovny said...

Two thoughts...ad blocker. I don't see any ads. and Janet did not have that baby.

longtimereader said...

Adbockplus is your friend.

SnarkIsFun said...

When it comes to the family, I just feel sorry for the kids, being born into that mess . . .

Yeah said...

Janet's fifty! She didn't have a baby! Why didn't she adopt or honestly use a surrogate. Hell.

I have heard that Rebbie is actually not Joseph's daughter and that she and Joseph brought Janet into the world. And that Rebbie raised Janet's actual daughter who she had with de Barge. No clue if that is true.

Advertisements

Popular Posts from the last 30 days