Friday, October 05, 2018

Blind Items Revealed #4

September 27, 2018

Three options. Jailed, assassinated, or whisked away to a third country. Everyone, including the subject, his host, and several other nation states know these are the options. It is basically a race between the latter two options. No one thinks the first will ever happen. If the third option occurs, look for this permanent A list female celebrity to meet him there at her first opportunity.

Julian Assange/Pamela Anderson

10 comments:

longtimereader said...

Go Julian! a hero of our time.

RealRescuesDon'tDoThis said...

I'm more appalled that Pam my would be considered permanent A list.

IanPhlegming said...

Pam is perm A-List--the definitive sex starlet of the 1980s, for better or worse (and I think worse). But her sex tape was the first, "Baywatch" was the #1 TV show worldwide, she was a Playboy staple, etc.

Julian Assange is a hero for sure. One of the great men of our time. Flawless? No. But a man of our times.

yepthatsme said...

PAM is permanent A list! She is the reason Paris Hilton and Kim Ktrashian became famous, Pam is a trailblazer! She opened the path for all these women to become famous!

IanPhlegming said...

1990s, not 80s, for Pam Anderson. Madonna was the sex symbol of the 1980s.

Farrah Fawcett for the 70s. Raquel Welch for the 1960s. Marilyn Monroe for the 1950s. Jane Russell for the 1940s. Hedy Lamarr for the 1930s.

Isabella c said...

+1 Amen @longtimereader he is a true hero

Unknown said...

Yeah but everyone has their time to shine at some point. To be permanent A-list, you need clout and respect in the industry and from the public. None of which Pam has. She’s just a he been 90s sex symbol. The ratings on this site are a joke.

Unknown said...

Has been*

Paul Saint John said...

And all these years I thought Assange was limited to boinking some frumpy middle-aged Honduran cleaning lady in the embassy! How in hell did he get to meet an over-the-hill Pamela Anderson?

Paul Reilly said...

Awesome and Assange has set standard for real news which other should follow or face criminal charges... mockingbird's bought and paid for media is damaging to the fabric of society and ruins lives adds zero value. The points raised on the average number of deaths caused by fake news and outright lies should (I'd hope - but doubt) see appropriate charges use and fake MSM held accountable. Fake news has now got so bad that sites like Snopes, metabunk and rationalwiki have become a source of truth for the people, but they're all fake also... There's no such thing as absolute truth and the last place we should escalate this to would become a war on objective reality. AI is revealing truths and yet increasingly manual adjustments and exceptions are required and applied to hide the lies, everything from, pizzagate to flat earth to free energy a cure for cancer. AI will ultimately reveal if we're able to survive the intermediate phase - https://www.quora.com/How-can-AI-help-counter-fake-news/answer/Paul-Reilly-12

Advertisements

Popular Posts from the last 30 days