Sunday, April 16, 2017

Blind Items Revealed #5

April 10, 2017

Not content with exclusives that don’t bring the clicks like they used to, the suck up butt kissing tabloids are actually being paid to run stories from this reality family to keep them front and center and on the covers of magazines and at the top of websites.

The Kardashians

17 comments:

Just4Fun said...

What don't they understand about the concept "We're tired of you"? Forcing even more of yourselves on us will not remedy the situation.

snitty said...

I'm just waiting for them to go the way of Paris Hilton

just sayin\' said...

when the dust settles on their moment in the sun and they look back on the choices they made for fame, will they feel that ballooning their bodies into no-longer-fashionable caricatures, or sacrificing their only son/brother to mental illness, addiction and obesity, or turning their youngest daughter/sister into a deluded porn clown, was worth it?

dianavonthirstybird said...

Thank you, Snits. You read my mind. I remember going to St. Patrick's Cathedral here in NYC and lighting candles begging God to make her go away!

Sd auntie said...

+10000000 . The daily mail is the worst. Usually 5 articles a day and all the comments are negative !! Get a frickin clue.

OKay said...

So we can't actually get rid of them until the money runs out? Practise your best tunnel vision and ride it out, folks. It will be worth it when they do eventually collapse.

... said...

People need to stop clicking on any kardashian story. Every time they do, it just makes more money.

... said...

But each of those comments (clicks) brings more revenue, that's how it works. People need to completely ignore any article about this pathetic family.

AyyPapi said...

The Kardashian money-train is fuelled by about 20% fans and about 80% haters. Sometimes there's little to separate the two as they both avidly click on anything Kardashian related and suck it up.

sandybrook said...

Remember when we heard the KTrash hired people to create followers to their accounts to make it seem like they are popular? Well those same employees that created those accounts are the one clicking and liking their stories now to make it appear the hoes are well liked and popular. Ratings for the tv show are the lowest it's ever been, PMK is desperate. a new porn tape should be cumming soon.

Melissa said...

Oh the moment so many of us have been waiting for is finally coming

Hortensia said...

LOL!!

Scandi Sanskrit said...

Yeah, I just don't give them any undeserved attention...

It's kind of hard, though, because I actually really enjoy Kanye's music.

Scandi Sanskrit said...

The really sad thing about Paris Hilton and Kim Kardashian is I heard they used to be friends (or at least they had a professional relationship where Kim was her former PA). Anyway, if I'm hearing the correct/most accurate part of the story, Kim got her start off selling Paris' dirt to the tabloids/gossip rags (that's how she developed a relationship with the celebrity/entertainment media—she positioned herself as Paris' snitch/tattletale). Now, like 10 years later, she's got an entire empire of her own and she's bigger than Paris...

And guess what? She's a role model for other coat-tail-riding famehoes now. There are people who will try to warm-up to you and try to be your friend, and try to dig up secrets from you (like when you're drunk) because they want to be the Kim to your Paris. They also like the attention they get from being that "source" who had firsthand contact with you ("oh, I'm in class with so-and-so, guess what she did today!", et cetera).

Just 2–3 years ago, I genuinely believed that if when you read a celebrity gossip peace and it said, "a source close to X says, X is furious that Y and Z were leaked to the press", it really genuinely meant that it was an insider leak... Now I understand that's just code for "this is a PR plant". But there are people out there who will befriend you because they genuinely believe every time they see those lines that a "Kim" just leaked on their "Paris" (and it wasn't the celeb's own PR's doing).

It's sad because Kim Kardashian did way more than set a standard for famehoes who want to be famous for being famous, she just normalised the whole "ride-on-my-BFF's-coat-tails-so-I-can-be-famous-myself" thing. And totally ruined the concept of trust in friendships. Or maybe I'm just old-fashioned...

Scandi Sanskrit said...

Sorry, I meant "if I’m hearing the correct/most accurate VERSION of the story" (not 'part'). I type faster than I think. LOL.

thierry said...

said a person who clicked and commented on the story.

Dee said...

Let's be honest ladies, we're all better off not buying those magazines. They make me feel so shit about my body and it's not even that bad. I thought it had to be something like that.

Advertisements

Popular Posts from the last 30 days