Friday, October 26, 2018

Blind Item #11

Apparently there are honorariums or gifts to charity made when a member of this family speaks at an event. However, this alliterate former actress is instead, asking for the money directly so she can give it to several charities herself. Ummm.

62 comments:

Tricia13 said...

Markle

Fuchsia said...

Meghan Markle?

sandybrook said...

Click bait #2

Ham Burglar said...

Looks like it's time to feed the trolls. When's the political blind?

drew holthaus said...

There is no business like american ho bidness! Hrh dutchess markle

drew holthaus said...

Not even the firm can turn a hooker into a housewife!

Nutty_Flavor said...
This comment has been removed by the author.
Boozie said...

what does she even need money for at this point?

Nutty_Flavor said...
This comment has been removed by the author.
Nutty_Flavor said...
This comment has been removed by the author.
drew holthaus said...

Meghan is spending more than kate on clothes. She needs to get paid to stay on the best dressed list

LEANNE NORMAN said...

Entry again showing he knows absolutely nothing about the Royals.
Your lies about Meghan for clicks are as pathetic as the people who have a pathological hatred for a woman they don't know, based on your lies.
Is she using the money to pay for her IVF or her surrogate?

Krab said...

That's not how any of this works, Enty.

drew holthaus said...

Shes does have a bangin bod according to those dm yachting pics. I wonder how harry feels about Freckles markle being the hollywood town bicycle

Do Not Lie said...

The paid sugar trolls are commenting here..their names from DM are pooping up here...I meant popping up here too.

drew holthaus said...

Poor Meghan out of money already

Boo Hearne said...


She is spending more $ on clothes than Kate? Her clothes are hideous. I cannot believe Harry isn't appalled every time he walks out the door with her. One fashion miss after another. Even before she got married, her choice of clothes and colors have been so not chic and royal-like. I will go to my death with the memory of that turd-brown cow ship hat she wore to an event. Hopefully, after she returns to the UK from this trip, they will lock her in her home until after the kid-ling arrives. I feel so sorry for her right now. Someone has it out for her and is responsible for these dreadful clothes choices. Where is Alexander McQueen when you need him?!

Boo Hearne said...

Cow CHIP. Sorry.

Hamid said...

I just hope she gives their kid a real ghetto name. If it's a boy, Tyrone. If it's a girl, Shantiqua.

Green Tea said...

Meghan Markle to Enty: The gift that keeps on giving.

Nutty_Flavor said...

Yeah, Boo, the poorly-chosen clothes are a mystery, although she does get it right every once in awhile. I think the solid-color green dress and the red dress she wore recently - the one with the tag hanging off the hem - were flattering to her.

The Oscar de la Renta 50s prom dress she wore to an otherwise casual dinner on her last day in Australia, not so much.

The strangest thing is the lack of British designers. Why doesn’t she take some fabulous young urban London designer and make him a star?

She should make the fashion industry her friend. British Vogue now has a black editor in chief, Edward Enninful. Can’t her recommend someone to style her?

Unknown said...

Many cdaners read DM to answer the daily blind. No jobs..

Bumtitty said...

She's basically a Sexy Mother Theresa

News said...

why? she is there for the money and glory why care about Brits

News said...

or pension

News said...

Yes! Fergie ages ago used to criticise the royals for not giving her enough money. Thats why she worked on other stories and took payments to introduce her husband. Hilarious!

sandybrook said...

It could be possible she had a contract with a designer when she acted and it's still in play?

cupofteaandsliceofcake said...

MM is making all the media a ton of money, might as well make some herself. I don't think this is true at all. She can't receive anything directly as payment for anything. But then again......panama papers showed there are way and means to hide a little in the biscuit tin / cookie jar that the public or treasury don't get wind of.

Nor Cal said...

I think Meghan usually dresses quite well, much better than Kate. Entry had a blind and a podcast explains how she gets her clothes. She gets free clothes from her friends and then submits phony receipts to Prince Charles for reimbursement.

Nor Cal said...

a podcast THAT explains... sorry for the typo

Aquagirl said...

Calling BS on this blind.

MM said...

Meghan is playing the old dress well game. Actresses that are not stars with a lot of cash, yet, but like to walk the red carpet, give deposit and then proceed to buy the dress online, don't remove the dress tag b/c after THE EVENT you are going to return it, and collect your money back.

rosie riveter said...

Dead?

Ringo said...

What kind of expenses do you think the Crown or good ole' Charles wouldn't pay?

Ringo said...

Maybe Mulroney doesn't receive free clothes from British designers?

MM said...

@Ringo But who is "forging recipients"? It is a serious crime in Britain!

Do Not Lie said...

IRS, are you paying attention? Watch out for this slippery grifter narc! The ruse only lasts for so long no matter who you know or whom you b loe.

Brayson87 said...

I seriously doubt she's running scams so soon out of the gate. The risk of ruining her brand would far outweigh whatever cash she could grab from these charitable donations.

Do Not Lie said...

Do not underestimate her ruthless greed, cunning, manipulation or attention seeking behavior. By now those behaviors have become consistently crystal clear.

MountainMama said...

Megan is not Sonja Morgan for fuck sake. The tag thing was none of her doing. Whomever helps her dress as fault for that.

Donmack said...

Speaking as someone who absolutely cannot stand Markle, this blind is utter nonsense.

The royals are never, ever paid in any way for giving speeches - not even via a charity. If they were, we (the UK public) would know it because it would legally have to be declared. They are in the service of the nation - everything they do, and receive, is on our behalf. They have to declare when they are gifted a tea towel or an apron - so there is no way that anyone could make a donation on their behalf (which amounts to a gift) without it being declared.

And, even if this were a thing (and it’s not) Markle & Harry wouldn’t have anything at all to do with the admin side. It would go through their staff & woukd have been arranged months in advance.

I don’t have any difficulty believeing that Markle is a right cow when the cameras are off (as there’s evidence of this elsewhere) but getting a cash donation for making a speech while representing the Queen & with the full guidance and support of the Foreign Office - absolutely no way.

Unknown said...

I think that the honorariums/gifts are referring to when it’s a personal charity rather than an official royal patronage. I can imagine that in the past MM probably channeled the funds she raised through her personal bank account, but would she be this stupid to continue the pattern post- “I do”?

drew holthaus said...

Im hoping for levitra Windsor if its a girl or shaq Windsor for a boy

drew holthaus said...

It doesnt matter. Once that baby is born she is set for life!

Donmack said...

When you’re “royal” (and I use that term loosely with Markle) there isn’t anything “personal” anymore. If she (or any of them) use their HRH in any capacity, then it’s on behalf of the Queen. Invictus/Grenfell Cook Book etc aren’t patronages, but neither are they entirely personal...since they are operated under the umbrella of HRH & thus on behalf of the Queen.

I really wish people understood the BRF a bit better. If they did they’d know that a lot of claims being made about Markle are impossible. There’s a blog that’s got everyone convinced that she & Harry are “merching” all over the place. This is impossible. KP know exactly where everything they wear in public comes from - because it would be a major scandal if it were shown, or even hinted at, that they were benefitting financially from their positions.

They can accept gifts, but they have to be declared - and lists of the gifts they’ve received is published annually.

I think Markle is a nasty, manipulative, deceitful, narcissistic user who fully deserves to be called out. But she no longer has any opportunity for financial impropriety - unless the KP staff are assisting in the fraud.

The BRF are not zelebs...the Queen is the HoS, and they are representing her everytime you see them. All this “merching” stuff is total tripe. Before the engagement, sure...but not since. (Excuse typos...the print on this blog is very small & I can barely read what I’ve written).

Do Not Lie said...

Donmack, in theory, I understand your explanation however Markle's behavior demonstrates that the rules don't apply to her so all bets are off with her complying with ANY royal protocol; I even go so far as to say she is giving the finger to BRF. With her narcissistic ruthless ambition, she's in it for the money, fame and position not for the love of PH which when the cameras aren't on them is clear. When the cameras are on then she's a limpet or koala overshadowing the business of The Queen and Country. No love or respect for Harry, the BRF or for following protocol. Moreover, with her covert shady merching and profit sharing with JM she is dragging the monarchy into unwitting corruption. She's the definition of Amerotrash.

emeraldcity said...

BS as usual, the RF would never allow her to accept the money, they aren't even allowed to accept free clothes from companies or personal gifts from heads of state it all goes through a dedicated 'gift' department for scrutiny, they may be allowed to use the gifts but they are not deemed their personal property (baby toys for instance). The media would be on it like butter on toast. There is strict protocal on these things and it has to go through the Queen if any change is to be made.

Donmack said...

You are missing my point a bit, Do Not Lie. I agree with your analyis of her character & her reasons for marrying Prince Dimwit - but she’s not really failing to comply with protocol in any significant way. She wouldn’t want to either, as she is desperate to be seen as a “real royal” so she’ll do as she’s asked in public. Her natural arrogance comes over, but that’s all.

Not wearing tights, crossing her legs wrong, walking before Harry....meh. Trust me, no one much cares about that.

She is NOT ABLE to be financially fraudulent in the way that’s being implied. She does not buy her own clothes...she just chooses them & they get sent to KP. I doubt they even arrive with her name on the parcel. There are a large number of office staff who will be doing everything for her, and any gifts that arrive have to go through them. There’s no way round that.

She probably gets up to all sorts of shady stuff...and I bet Clarence House & BP are keeping a close eye...but she cannot rip anyone off unless he involves the KP staff.

Boo Hearne said...

Never read a comment by HAMID when you have a mouth full of mashed potatoes and gravy!!! It will take all night to clean it off my Dell screen!!! Too, too funny! Hope it's a girl and she grows up sucker punching her cousins at Birthday parties!!!

Hamid said...

Happy to spread laughter.

Lonely Bastard said...

I keep lizards in my honorarium.

Dannette said...

Never underestimate the depths to which a grifting narcissist will stoop. Ever.

sandybrook said...

+1 to everything Donmack posted. It's sounds very correct and I'm pretty convinced he knows what he's talking about.

Jane Hanoi said...

maybe shes hedging her bets and saving a nest egg for the future?
as wills and kates kids grow up, they will be become the spotlight and heirs ......and then harry and megs kids will end up being the unfortunate cousins (like beatrice ) who will have to make their own way in the world with no income.
if she ends up divorcd like sarah she,ll be essentially pennyless with no prospects to make money because she,ll be too old to yacht

Hortensia said...

I too had a laugh at Hamid's post!
So PIC!
We could come up with a list of names, just for fun.

I'm gonna start my list, and post it in a MM blind.

Cee Kay said...

@Donmack, I love you. Cheers from Canada!

boredatwork boredatwork said...

LMAO Hamid!

MM is such a fake AF try-hard and so unlikeable. And harry now just looks like her dim-witted servant. Tragic.

Stupidpervs said...

Yea..I bet harry doesn't spend his moment on his legally wedded wife...enjoy the kool aide

Amazing Quotes said...


Very Nice And Interesting Post, thank you for sharing
Inspirational Quotes - Gym Quotes
Best Quotes - Success Quotes
Positive Life Quotes - Image Bank
Future Quotes - Excellence Quotes
كلام جميل - حكم عن الحياة

Habibti said...

Royals are not allowed to be paid or accept donations. Their service is free as it is their duty. In return they get to live in a castle and have everything provided by the tax payers money. This is definitely a fake blind.

Habibti said...

Also royals do not really get to choose their childrens names. They are given a shortlist of historic royal names and can choose names from that list only. So there will be no Shaniqua or Tyrones or even a Pedro since she is half Mexican (hehehehehe! Good one Hamid!)

Scandi Sanskrit said...

Oh wow. I did not Know that and that is fascinating.

(That was still a good joke tho Hamid. LOLOLOLLLLOL. Just in terms of trolling Queen Betty—and there is actual evidence she’s racist AF, there was an article listing all the times she called foreign world leaders questionable things—complete with videographic evidence, but curiously now the articles/videos have vanished from the Interwebs? So now I have to say the Queen’s only “ALLEGEDLY” racist because all the proof is gone, and it’s like Harry’s new bride is supposed to prove otherwise... I SEE WHAT YOU DID THERE BETTY.)

See this is why Meghan haters need to take a chill pill. How would you like it if you had to pick your kid’s name from a boring ass list of basic names that’ve been used a gajillion times before? Sometimes with ridiculously impersonal Roman numerals behind them (by the time England goes republic, it’ll be Richard LXXXVIII). There’s nothing to be jealous of. People keep saying Meghan is an “opportunist”, but I get the vibes that the British royal family is using HER too (to appear “modern”, etc). Her life basically sucks now. 🤷🏻‍♀️

I’ve always wanted to name my kid Durian myself, after The Goop named hers Apple. 👶🏻 (Or “Durianne” if little Scandi Jr. is a girl—maybe add “Hathaway” as a middle name for LULZ, or maybe not... Last time I wanted to name people “Christopher-Robin” [hyphenated] back in 2013–2014 people FREAKED! OUT! at the “Robin” bit for some reason. Weird... 😒 Eh.) I’d never name a girl after “Teh Dark Lady” tho because in my culture it’s very important what you name your children—it’s considered a “prayer/prophecy” (so thank goodness my mother didn’t name me Diana after Meghan‘s late MIL in the end, because look what happened to her—RIP) and I’m not naming any daughter of mine after an “other woman”.

I’ve seen real cases of people naming their child after the Virgin Mary (any variation of it, really—from the Roman “Maria” to the French “Marie”) and the girl becomes an eternal virgin. Who. Just. Can’t. Get. Laid. 😭

Naming your children is so important in my culture that the village people used to consult my grandfather (who was a Village Head before bloody democracy had to happen) prior to deciding on a name for their newborns. It’s very spiritual, the process of a naming a child. (Something about the numerology of the way the Sanskrit letters add up too & whatnot, although IDK much on the details of how that works exactly.)

Picking from a list seems very cold... “What’s today’s special?” she asked the palace butler.

Advertisement

Popular Posts from the last 30 days