Cookies & 3rd Party Advertisements Google, as a third party vendor, uses cookies to serve ads on your site. Google's use of the DART cookie enables it to serve ads to your users based on their visit to your sites and other sites on the Internet. Users may opt out of the use of the DART cookie by visiting the Google ad and content network privacy policy. We allow third-party companies to serve ads and/or collect certain anonymous information when you visit our web site. These companies may use non-personally identifiable information (e.g., click stream information, browser type, time and date, subject of advertisements clicked or scrolled over) during your visits to this and other Web sites in order to provide advertisements about goods and services likely to be of greater interest to you. These companies typically use a cookie or third party web beacon to collect this information. To learn more about this behavioral advertising practice or to opt-out of this type of advertising, you can visit http://www.networkadvertising.org/managing/opt_out.asp.
70 comments:
What you talkin' about Willis?
What does this mean?
Joan Collins and Emmanuelle Seigner, Roman Polanskis wife?
SJP
Jennifer Aniston / Denise Richards?
And Huma Abedin/Weiner
Charlie Sheen seems obvs as the awful sexually perverted, teen loving infamous husband. But if it's Denise, wouldn't it say ex-husband? And I have no idea what in the actual hell this blind is even getting at.
...what does this even mean
"Allowing"? Assuming she doesn't have either one of them on a leash, all I can think of is she's letting them use an apartment of hers to meet in, or something like that.
Enty we need your cliff notes, please
(SJP was my guess which makes me feel good about myself since that's what tricia said lol... i like matthew broderick actually but at this point i wouldn't be shocked to hear that a guy in hollywood likes teens)
What Jen Aniston does "allowing" Humane Abedin to hook up with "a man who is not [Huma's] husband" mean? And does this "and is her financial backer" apply to Aniston or to the "man who is not her husband?
I guess "allowing" could mean the actress is turning a blind eye, or giving her blessing, while the celebrity bangs the actress's husband/boyfriend. But in that case Aniston and Huma don't work, because what's-his-name Aniston's husband wouldn't be Huma's financial backer.
Huma and Bill Clinton were rumored to be in Hawaii at the same time recently -- you know, when people were wondering how she can afford to stay at the $1000/night Four Seasons. But he's not her financial backer, and why would an A- list actress have any say in whom old Bill hooks up with these days? So that doesn't seem to work either.
Has to be whoever the boyfriend of the A-list dual threat actress is ... the man is not the actress's husband, but is the actress' financial backer .
This is the vaguest blind item in a long time. Commenting in case anyone solves it.
Can't be any married actress.
Bill could be Huma's financial backer, if he's paying her to keep Hillary "occupied" :)
No JA, No SJP , ect.
Marge Simpson
SJP first name that came to mind.
I am drawing a blank - why is SJP "dual threat"?
In entry’s May world it can and often means Film/TV... her movie success has been moderate but she’s iconic (possibly perm A if her), due to Carrie Bradshaw/SATC ..:)
Why would anyone be Sarah Jessica Parker's financial backer?
She's too old to run in the Derby.
Matthew Broderick is a genuinely nice dude...👍👍
She has a fashion line (handbags,accessories etc), but I get where you were going with that😵
Wouldn't he normally call that "with a side gig"? Not sure this is SJP. But it is an iconic role.
Ah, I was taking the two "her"s in the last line as referring to the celebrity, but many of you are taking them to refer to the actress, which also works. Maybe better. Although if the man definitely isn't the actress's husband, that takes away the one slim reason I could think of that the actress would have a right to allow/disallow two other people to hook up.
SJP is allowing Huma to hook up with a man in a house she owns, or something like that?
Are there words or commas missing in this blind? Why does a "permanent A- list dual threat actress" get to allow another A list celebrity to have sex with a man who isn't her husband? Or something. Even the answers posted aren't making sense. More coffee...
I bet codebreakers wouldn't even be able to decipher this. Huh?
So assuming it's SJP, then maybe her partner in her shoe stores? George Malkemus?
https://www.hollywoodreporter.com/news/sarah-jessica-parker-open-sjp-collection-store-las-vegas-1001082
We do know she's connected to Huma Abedin through the fashion world: https://pagesix.com/2017/01/30/huma-abedin-has-serious-dinner-with-high-profile-designer/
This is so confusing and I keep returning hoping someone can decipher the blind. The first part seems straightforward (and a dual threat, so not just actress - although it could be one who directs/produces as the dual instead of singing, which was what I was thinking at first)
The second part is like staring at one of those 3d pictures in the 90s mall kiosks and trying to see what is allegedly clearly there... The only thing I can make of it is the A- dual threat is allowing it because the man more lavender than husband. And she allows the A list celebrity with the sleezy husband to sleep with her non-husband/financial backer.
A List celebrity could be so many professions, unless specifically celebrity with nothing to explain it (Paris,Kim,etc).
James Woods comes to minds as the sleezy husband who dates younger, but he isn't married now. Or Lauren Weedman who divo
The allowing part is what is so damn confusing. Why would A list needs A- list permission to sleep with someone who isn't A- husband? Is the financial backer her dad or son?
Good one, J!
Well if that wrinkly Bethany Frankel has a backer, so can SJP
Well I'm sure that financial backer is one lovely human being considering the circles Huma Abedin and her family run in.
@DonK - if a beard relationship w/ actress, that could be the "allowing" ... what A- list dual threat actress has a beard/sugar daddy and a celebrity friend w/ a pervert husband?
I apparently need to go have a drink or three to understand this one.
Sounds like a mother who controls a family empire is allowing the daughter to step outside her marriage with someone who benefits the family. That's the only way I can make sense of "allowing", but I dunno who fits that situation.
Alternate though less likely interpretation- The A- list actress has veto rights on who her financial backer and sleep with, but is allowing this celeb.
I’m thinking it’s b/c SJP has been in a couple of Broadway musicals (Annie, Once Upon a Mattress), and she did an arc on Glee as well, so she can sing. Def SJP.
Oh I agree🙏🏻🥂100 percent... that’s the correct use of the term, but Enty is kinda stubborn about this film TV thing.... she’s actually a triple threat,by definition.,although her hubby is much more prolific in theatre
Wouldn't SJP's iconic role be cable rather than television though? My first thought was Heigl because of middling success in movies, iconic role = Grey's but not sure she's a dual threat in any way or otherwise fits.
I'm loving the comments here. Glad some of you can make heads or tails out of this one.
I always thought "dual threat" was Enty speak for bisexual. These blunds look waaaaay different now lol
I agree @Tricia. Do you have a guess for Huma's financial backer?
If Soros wasn’t so reptilian okd(as in Dinasaur)- I’d suggest him.
But could be😉
My guess is Kerry Washington /Huma Abedin /Tony Goldwyn
From abc.com:
"With steamy on-air chemistry and a flair for fashion, Kerry Washington has turned Olivia Pope into an iconic character."
and from people.com April 2016:
“Hillary was in town for a fundraiser, and Tony [Goldwyn, who plays President Fitzgerald Grant] and I thought we might get off work in time to go, but we didn’t,” [Kerry] Washington told Adweek. “So I emailed Huma [Abedin, Clinton’s longtime aide] and said, ‘Why don’t you guys come here?’ And they were able to.”
lastly, pics or it didn't happen (from 2017):
http://www.tmz.com/2017/03/20/tony-goldwyn-huma-abedin-disneyland/
I, too, don't understand the "She has been allowing" line in the blind.
SJP and Huma Abedin.
The sexually perverted husband is Weiner who sent photos to teens.
That's why he's in prison. And, they're not yet divorced.
There's no hint of who's the financial backer to Abedin.
SJP is the most ridiculous guess. Just because someone blurts our the first thing that pops in their head does not make it the right answer.
This is a very confusing blind.
Some ideas: What if "allowed" means that the two women are engaged in an affair? What if "allowed" means the actress is having an affair with her "financier" and allowing the other woman to have sex with him?
SJP is a dual threat bc she sings too. she's been on broadway a few times. by enty's terms he probably means both stage and screen tho
You are misreading the blind. Even if the answer is SJP, this blind does not refer to SJP's husband.
SJP acts and sings, but isn’t much of a threat at either. Huma Abedin has the appalling husband (Carlos Danger!) who is currently incarcerated, so she”s hooking up with ... whose financial backer? Hmmm ... doesn’t SJP have her own pile? But if she does, then why/what is she “allowing”? So I think it must be Huma’s financial backer. Is he also SJP’s sugar daddy? I don’t think Bill Clinton is anybo dy’s sugar daddy and he wouldn’t go for Huma. You’d think Hilldawg could spring for a few bucks.
Guys, the dual threat actress is allowing Huma to come ovee t her house so that Huma can have sex with Huma's financial backer. At least this is my interpretation. Could be SJP, could be Aniston.
*IF* Huma is the person referred to as having a "backer," it should be noted that she has extensive family and personal ties to the Muslim Brotherhood, and that on the political right there is some suspicion that she might be acting as their agent. But that doesn't fit with the statement that the backer is "a man."
@Tricia
Soros money is behind a lot, isn't it? Wonder if this "financial backer" is part of the money laundering? Also, the Huma blinds have been coming fast, wonder if something is breaking soon?
Yeah I'd like some Cliff Notes for yesterday's "HAS NO RECOLLECTION" blind item about the trolll farms. Especially now that the 3 new trolls are talking to one another (or sock-puppeting) and one has began an attempt to appear less "trolly" after Enty posted 2 troll farm BI's in a day.
*AND about the troll farms
HAHAHHAHHAHAHHAHAH
She would also be labelled actress, not celebrity.
What about Coke Mom? Was Grace Adler iconic?
I'd find it hard to believe that SJP would get enmeshed in all that muslim brotherhood terrorist insanity, and she's rich enough not to need financial backers. But I can see coked up and mentally deranged Coke Mom going down this route, in the name of female empowerment.
Also decades of coke sound expensive ..
I know that- I didn’t include him in my answer... I just made a statement about the guy- a general one:)
Entirely possible @Sign...
Confusing! So we have....
1. A- list actress, dual threat (singing/acting?)
2. A list celeb (married) to
3. Teen-loving husband.
4. Financial backer of 1, who 1 can dictate sexual partners to (why? - also the partner then?).
The first thing I thought was that 'middling' might be a pun and I thought of Bette Midler (doesn't really fit), Tuppence Middleton (definitely doesn't fit), and then Malcolm In The Middle (no dice either). Now thinking it isn't a pun and just means what it says.
🤣
Jesus Christ, what is this mess?! Dashes, Enty, dashes.
Herman Munster
Marcia Brady
Thing
My first post!
Here is one scenario that may fit this disaster of a blind:
Let's say Huma is trying to secure a new revenue stream. She may be getting some 'investment' from this man, who also has close business ties with the A- list actress. Why would it matter? Perhaps because any money to Huma is undoubtedly being used to protect the perv husband and this actress actively supports "me too"/"times up". The 'allowing' may come from the fact that the actress could ruin the relationship/deal, but is not- for whatever reason. Huma is in a sympathetic situation in trying to prevent further damage to her young son (that poor kid has some very difficult years ahead already). It's a tough spot.
Eva Longoria seems to tick the boxes in this one-of-many, purely speculative, interpretations.
She also has business partners in publishing and fashion (things Huma could do), is very involved in politics, is a founder of the new Times Up foundation, will be a mom herself soon, and has had her own highly-publicized sexting scandal.
aww this is a Friday blind! reruns! enty wake up we are not done yet
I challenge you to a dance off! toast to that?
Post a Comment