Monday, November 08, 2010

Joe Francis Got Married


As much as I knew this day was coming, I really thought that at some point Christina McLarty would wake up, and not marry Joe Francis. Either she wears the biggest set of blinders known to mankind or she simply does not care about all the horrible ways Joe Francis has treated women over the years. Over the weekend, Christina turned in her self respect card and married Joe Francis in a civil ceremony in Mexico. In a shocking move, apparently there were no underage women posing topless and no women were either physically or verbally assaulted by the sex offender.

44 comments:

RocketQueen said...

Ladies and gentlemen....place your bets!

BigMama said...

maybe, just maybe he didn't have her sign a pre-nup and all of this is just one giant con job to take all his ill gotten gains. Or she's just stupid. either way.....

Patty said...

It's not blinders, it's selective vision. Here is what she sees: $$$$$$$$$$$$$

I would anticipate a domestic violence case from this a-hole.

Is here wearing a drawstring bag on his back?

Susan said...

What? What? WHAT??????

This is more baffling than Lisa Marie marrying MJ.

What woman in her right mind would marry this douchebag?

jax said...

it's civil ceremony out of country not a wedding,she won't get a dime. Joe may be the King of Douchey rapists but he's a smart pedophile.

Miranda said...

This is so gross that my skin is crawling.

sunnyside1213 said...

I don't understand jax? Why would a ceremony out of the country be ok?

looserdude said...

Joe's a sleaze, true, but he's a super rich sleaze.

The best things in life are free
But you can keep them for the birds and bees
Now give me money
That's what I want
That's what I want, yeah
That's what I want

Pookie said...

ita, sunny.

as for this christina idiot...maybe she's just low on the self-esteem barometer...or stupid.

Meir said...

@Jax, a civil ceremony is a legal marriage with no religious affiliation. No priest, rabbi, minister, just a judge or mayor. He's married to her now (hurling in my boot)

jax said...

because state laws don't apply to out of state marriages i'm assuming...

jax said...

with regards to divorces...i could be wrong

Rickatoo said...

jax, I think the place of residence determines the prevailing divorce law. if they claim california as their primary residence, then cali law will prevail when they divorce.

trouble bubble said...

I thought what jax said. When it comes to divorce, it will turn out this marriage was not even legal

FS said...

If it was a legal marriage in Mexico, it will be a legal marriage in California. Are you trying to say that couples that get married in Canada or England or France or wherever are not recognized in California? Does that mean Jim Kazczinski had to get married again when he came home to start taping the office again? Of course not.

For the love of humanity, please tell me that one or both of these people is sterile? Idiocracy is just a movie, but I fear it is closer to coming true every day.

Anonymous said...

LOL@sterile

Jamie's Girl said...

What a douchebag!

Sue Ellen Mishkey said...

I don't think Idiocracy is just a movie. I see it everyday.

Mooshki said...

Yep, I think if their primary residence is California she can file for divorce under their rules. He probably gave her a decent prenup - a million bucks if they stay married 5 years, or something like that.

timebob said...

I read somewhere, maybe twitter that it was just a ceremony and not a legal wedding. Becuase they didn't want to be marrie until all gays could be legally wed also.

But with Joe who knows what the truth is.

Sue Ellen Mishkey said...

Gay people won't be allowed to get married in the States until the fear mongering stops. The amount of fear that people have about things that they know nothing about is shocking. At least to me.

I have a fun side story, but I doubt anyone is interested.

M said...

I thought you had to get a civil marriage certificate in your state of residence to back up a marriage in a foreign country different than where you reside? That's what Ben Affleck and Jennifery Garner did, as well as Tom Cruise and Katie Holmes. For the latter, they had the civil ceremony to make it legal (and binding) and then flew over for the pomp and circumstance wedding in Italy.

Of course, you could do it the other way around, too (pomp and circumstance in foreign country, but have to make it legit when you return).

Mango said...

Wow, Christina got herself a real prize!

@ Sue Ellen - yes we are! Tell, TELL!

Sue Ellen Mishkey said...

It's not that fun really. Just I serve a lot of Americans due to the proximity of my work to our sports venues and the comments I hear about gays almost blow my eyebrows off. I'd say 90% of the American's I serve go out of their way to comment on the gay situation here in Toronto. It's a big deal to them. That's why I don't think the gays will be able to marry in America until the fear mongering stops. I think that will take a while.

looserdude said...
This comment has been removed by the author.
looserdude said...

I asked a guy one time why he didn't think gay folks should be allowed to marry, and he said because then people would want to marry animals next. I was incredulous.

Sue Ellen Mishkey said...

Exactly. This weekend I heard the word "fags" more than I care to mention. For it was the Bills vs the Bears at the old Skydome.

At one point I said something because it was just killing me on the inside. Please don't come here and spew your crazy hatred. Ah thank you.

caydian said...

So what if she's marrying him for money! Can't think of a better punishment for this scum than for a gold-digger to take him for all of his ill-gotten gains. I just hope she doesn't get pregnant.

iheartjacksparrow said...

I found this on a site about laws in Mexico:

"Your Marriage Certificate will be valid world-wide, BUT you should get your certificate 'legalised' in Mexico to ensure it is legally accepted when you get back home."

captivagrl said...

ew.

parissucksliterally said...

well, I have no pity for her when he fucks her over somehow. She knew what she was getting.

jax said...

ok thanks guys!

so do we think he's shifting his assets to her to avoid the IRS or is he in shit and wants to avoid her testifying?


we all know this POS doesn't "just" get married.

0 said...

I call separation and divorce following domestic and/or sexual abuse charges within the next two years. Three years tops. F

Francis is a lifer when it comes to being a douchey, abusive scumbag and the girl is a complete idiot to marry him. He has NO redeeming qualities whatsoever.

MCH said...

Blech.

I'm not sure I'm buying their reasoning having a civil ceremony.

Monica said...

Please God - if you do exist - please don't ever let them procreate. And if you do, please don't let them have girls. Can you imagine being Joe Francis' little girl and finding out what daddy does?

Mina said...

I'm a bit confused, Sue Ellen. I read a comment from you the other day in which you called someone a pussy.
I'm just interested in knowing how someone can be so outraged about gay slurs and yet is totally fine with using misogynistic ones. Could you explain?

shakey said...

Patty, I think it's another man's arm. But it could be a rape kit for the virgin he has tied down in another room ...

Sue Ellen Mishkey said...

Sorry Mina, I don't have to explain myself to you. I can be offended by gay slurs all I want, but still call someone a pussy when they're being one.

__-__=__ said...

There's a gay situation in Toronto? What's the deal?? It always seemed like an interesting place to visit to me, but what do I know.

Sue Ellen Mishkey said...

It is. You should come, everyone loves it. We just are a liberal society and approve/promote the gays. Some people are scared of that. I dunno. If you do come here, save yourself some money and skip the CN Tower.

Mina said...

That's a shame that you can't answer my question, Sue Ellen. It's wonderful that, on one hand, you care so much to respect the feelings of certain people but on the other hand don't seem to mind to offend and degrade others.
A real shame.

Sue Ellen Mishkey said...

I never said that I couldn't answer it, I just don't have to explain myself to you. Fair enough? If you can't see the distinction, than that is your issue, not mine.

Sue Ellen Mishkey said...

Know what I think is a real shame? That people on here think Polanski is some monster, but Michael Jackson is an artist. Why don't you go on your little holier than thou rants at that?

Mina said...

I wonder why you're getting so defensive over one simple question? I was genuinely interested in your answer but your attitude shows me that you seem to be quite aware about how hypocritical you come across, otherwise you would have no problem to explain yourself to someone else.

I don't feel holier than thou at all but I am a woman and I think I have the right to ask of another woman why she has such high standards when it comes to respect and protect a certain group of people but then has no problems to make her own kind feel inferior to others by using such words.
Asking those questions and being interested in the motives of people behaving that way has nothing to do with feeling superior, better or -as you put it- holier than others.

As to your question about why Polanski is regarded as a monster and Michael Jackson is still considered an outstanding artist of the past century (which I don't have a problem to answer, by the way); Polanski is a convicted child molester and rapist who admitted to his crime but prevented himself from being sentenced by leaving the U. S. whereas Michael Jackson was never convicted and even was proven not guilty by court. To this day, there is no proof that he was a child molester.

I would say that this makes a big difference, don't you think?!

Advertisement

Popular Posts from the last 30 days