Blind Items Revealed #1
December 26, 2019
When the person is the killer or at least who has known the killer and covered up for them for decades, it is a really bad idea to let them be the executive producer of a podcast to find the killer and track down leads in this case all of you know.
John Ramsey/JonBenet Ramsey/"The Killing of JonBenét: The Final Suspects"
When the person is the killer or at least who has known the killer and covered up for them for decades, it is a really bad idea to let them be the executive producer of a podcast to find the killer and track down leads in this case all of you know.
John Ramsey/JonBenet Ramsey/"The Killing of JonBenét: The Final Suspects"
23 comments:
Yeah don’t be giving OJ any ideas, it’s bad enough he has social media and uses it.
His son did sue the news network for suggesting he did it. Better safe than sorry and its not dad
The son is incredibly creepy
John is autistic so keep that in mind. Might have been him but realistically, if you know anything about the case it wasn't.
@Dwelsh, do you mean BURKE is autistic? John is the Dad. Burke the brother/son.
Last I heard, the father son were estranged and not speaking to each other. This apparently goes back before Burke gave that creepfest interview.
I think it was the weirdo-rama neighbor.
Sandybrook-- Well said!😂
I don't get that this is referring to Burke, either. While he definitely has an odd demeanor, it might be from being on the spectrum, or even having been raised amidst numerous tragedies.
if this was Burke, his parents failed him. As a child, they should have just admitted that and got him help. To think that if he did it, he had to keep it a secret and endure everything that went on would be so difficult- and with no help for his issues. I always thought he might have lashed out and accidentally gravely injured her. I think everything else that happened was to cover up. I read where he had extreme jealousy about Jon Benet and how much attention she garnered. I have read he had previous very odd behavior that he directed at his sister. So sad.
It was the son. He bashed her on the head with a toy. Then they made it look like a strangulation. Yeah when the child was suffering from a head wound and needed to be taken to the hospital and could have lived. The Ramsey's strangled her and made it look like a murder because they had a reputation to uphold. How would it look if their own child did this to their beloved Jon Benet. Whose child pageant career was in major jeopardy as well. I mean who is gonna think this child with a huge scar on her head and possible brain damage could be worthy of child beauty pageants anymore? Yup the Ramsey's were sickos!
Yeesh
BULL$HIT
Family didn’t do it
None of it explains the DNA found in her panties that was not any of the family members.
Some beauty pageant stalker got in the house and raped and murdered Jon Benet. Until they screw up and are hit in the DNA database we will never know who. Or they are already dead by this point.
If Enty actually had proof this would be the biggest story of the decade. He's speculating like the rest of us.
Not Burke, IMO
Some sicko friend of the family who was staying for a visit & had dirt on Daddy. That's where the guarding their reputation comes in to play. Sad regardless
I don't think it's Burke, either. There was scientific evidence that can't be explained away. And the kid being socially awkward is a horrible trait to adjudge him guilty for. If that's all it took, I'm guilty AF, too. I don't think we can reasonably expect a kid whose baby sister was murdered in their home on Christmas, who then gets to relive it each and every day of his life by people driving by his house, stalking him at his private school, approaching him in public, just staring and whispering, having your mother die, reopening all the original leads to rehash...on and on and on....I'm crazier than a pet racoon sometimes, and none of that shit happened to me. Give the kid a break. I don't think it was the immediate family. The sticking point that always got me was the exact dollar amount in the ransom note. It was someone who knew them and/or had access to them, and/or their financial/business dealings. And who had a fetish for 35yo looking 6 year olds with rich daddies. I wish Burke and John Ramsey peace.
After reading way too much about this case I'm convinced it was Burke or his neighbor friend that killed her, the neighbor boy who had a crush on her. She was also being sexually abused. Probably in that basement room where they found her, by Burke or his friend. Burke knows who did it, if he didn't do it himself. It never made one bit of sense to me that her parents would kill her. There is no reason to watch more shows about it, no one will ever confess because they know by now they will never be arrested.
Apparently no one in this thread actually read the blind item? Neither the father nor the son was an executive producer of a podcast seeking leads about the murder. That was a major hint.
😞
@Just Checking is right. John Ramsey did not produce this podcast. Burke didn’t either.
The two names I’ve found with a quick google search are Dylan Howard and Matt Sprouse. They are the executive producers.
Burke dropped his lawsuit because the attorneys advised him that any new evidence against him could bring charges against him and he would be tried as an adult.
The Touch DNA found in the panties indicated that the person was from the Philippines -- where her underwear was made.
Burke was eating a bowl of pineapple and milk. Pineapple pieces were found in Jon Bonet stomach.
The flashlight on the table was the only item that did NOT have finger prints on it.
The skull crushing wound on her head, was made by the flashlight.
It was well known that Burke had an uncontrollable temper.
The cops should have interviewed the parents separately. They never did.
Lastly, the parents really screwed up! At that time, Colorado had a law that anyone 12 years of age or younger could NOT be tried for murder.
Just Checking - so John Ramsey wanted to be an executive producer but was told no? Without context it sounds like Ent is saying he is the exec producer.
There was no intruder to the Ramsey home. The snow in the yard was completely undisturbed. Read the book 'JonBenet' by Steve Thomas. He was the lead investigator with Boulder PD for the case, and he ended up resigning in disgust at the corruption and coverup that permeated Boulder's legal system from the District Attorney's office downward. This file was botched from every direction. It's an infuriating read. Money talks in that town...
Patsy wrote the ransom note with zero doubt. Experts have concluded it more or less. I have always assumed that Patsy accidentally killed JonBenet in a drunken stupor after trying to awake her to use the bathroom in the middle of the night. JonBenet had a bedwetting and soiling problem, and was notorious for being borderline violent when awoken from a deep sleep. Patsy may have shaken JonBenet or shoved her in frustration after trying to guide the half-awake, incredibly grumpy and flailing JonBenet into the bathroom, causing a trip, dive and fall scenario wherein JonBenet bashed her head on the side of the bathtub. Then, perhaps Patsy tried to make it appear like the kidnapping/strangulation homicide because it was obvious JonBenet was critically injured to the point of never walking again. Also, admitting the truth would entail exposing Patsy's provoking and abusive behaviors which led up to the fall - which would have a domino effect. Burke would have likely been taken from the home by CPS, as well as Patsy charged with second degree murder. It would have garnered incredibly negative publicity for John's company and ruined their high-standing reputations among the wealthy elite in Boulder. Patsy probably admitted the truth to John, sobbing and begging him to protect her due to the incident having been somewhat accidental in nature.
John Ramsey, who had already been through his own hellish grief having lost his oldest daughter (from his first marriage), Beth, in a tragic accident a few years previously, may have agreed to the coverup to prevent further trauma in the fallout - Burke being taken, Patsy taken to jail and tried for murder, and tarnish to the Ramsey name and business reputation.
This was always my top guess because Steve Thomas indicated in his book that the Ramseys failed to hang up the phone properly after Patsy made the 911 call, and additional background noise was captured. That extra audio was enhanced and analyzed. The transcription of that enhanced audio indicated that Patsy moaned out a plea to God for help, and John responded with a hostile, accusatory statement toward Patsy to the effect of "WE are NOT speaking to YOU!". The 'we' in question being himself (John Ramsey) and Burke (who was also heard on the call asking if his parents "had found anything out").
I don't believe Burke did it simply because of that recording. I do agree he behaves like he is on the spectrum, and that the Ramseys likely WERE trying to conceal Burke's condition, as they were very prideful. Also, I am betting that they were afraid that Burke would not corroborate Patsy's story, and/or might provide damning testimony as to other instances of questionable (possibly abusive) conduct by Patsy toward the kids, if pressed for details by authorities. As the mom of a 10 year old kid with high functioning ASD, I could totally see this being the case. Regardless of how ugly, damning, or embarrassing the truth might be in a given situation (even to his own detriment), my son WILL NOT lie if he is asked a question, point-blank. He is very literal, and there is no gray areas where truth telling is concerned. I have always wondered if this was why the Ramseys shielded Burke from being properly questioned by the authorities.
Uh, I was pretty sure it was her brother. It made totally sense to me. BUT, after reading Just cheking, I have to start building my theories all over agaaaain
Post a Comment