Friday, August 24, 2018

Blind Item #10

You know the alliterate actress who had the secret baby? Yeah, her. Apparently the father of the baby has visited the now, not a baby, several times in 2018. To my knowledge, those were the first visits ever.

48 comments:

MontanaMarriott said...

january Jones?

sandybrook said...

January Jones and maybe Bobby Flay?

MDAnderson said...

Matthew Vaughn??

Unknown said...

Kevin Bacon

Sara, Making It Work said...

Her baby wasn't secret.

sandybrook said...

Daddy is though Sara.

Elamina said...

Meghan Markle was my first thought but Enty usually calls her 'A- former actress', right? She supposedly had a baby when she was in college. If true, that kid could be 15-18 by now.

Brayson87 said...

Mystery baby usually points at a married daddy.

Nutty_Flavor said...

If it is Markle, all the trivia her family is releasing to the Daily Mail takes on an entirely different tone. It sounds a lot more like blackmail - send more money or we'll release the real dish.

That said, the family keeps using Markle's preferred photo agency when they are SUDDENLY CAUGHT UNAWARE by the DM photographers, so maybe Meghan's working with them as a distracting tactic.

DDonna Tarttty said...

Better late than never. I could be critical, but I'll just applaud this turn of events.

Ophelia said...

Oooh Nutty I like that idea. Her family is very self aware if they don't realize how idiotic this is making them look so they really are dumb if they're pushing their own agenda.

Also I keep thinking it's odd that there are constant articles saying "Royal family in a tizzy over Markles" "Meghan devastated by father" from inside sources but the royals haven't done anything to stop it...It's probably all orchestrated for publicity.

Unknown said...

If this were true and they knew wouldn’t you think she would’ve been paid them to shut up? This is bullshit and that family can just stop bc she’s NOT paying up

Unknown said...

How’s having her estranged family continuously bash her good publicity? How is causing problems within her new family good? It’s hella embarrassing. That family wants money and the royal family refuses to be extorted so they won’t pay up. Eventually they’ll go away

Ophelia said...

Unknown - I thought everyone realized during the 2016 presidential campaign that for celebrities any publicity is good publicity is the golden rule.

The Markle drama keeps the royals at the front page of every tabloid for free. Do you really believe that The Firm is so incompetent that they would have frequent "emergency meetings" about a situation and still be unable to resolve it?

I still believe it's entirely possible that the Markles are just that stupid (humanity is constantly finding new lows in that regard), I just find it odd that if the royals are that upset they haven't figured out a solution after months of this.

That being said I don't think this is about Meghan. I think it's January Jones. Meghan clearly doesn't have custody of the kid so how could the father visit? And it doesn't say former.

Nutty_Flavor said...

@Ophelia I agree with you about the publicity - but whose publicity?

The Royal Family doesn't need publicity, except for the usual stale sort where they cut a ribbon on a new motorway or tour a rehabilitation center and shake hands with photogenic commoners.

The people who benefit from this type of publicity are the DM (thousands of comments every single day, even on stories about obscure Markle relatives, what an advertising bonanza!), the family if they're getting paid, and Meg herself, who is presumably trying to position herself for a celebrity career outside the royal family after they dump her.

It looks like she's in Canada at the moment and Harry's in Botswana. True love, dat.

Susan said...
This comment has been removed by the author.
Elamina said...

True, it doesn't say former. But if if if it was true, the baby could've been given up for adoption. And if the father was a sleazy/user/opportunist, he sees Meghan all over the media and tracks down the child to cash in.

Ophelia said...

lol it wouldn't be surprising if the blind about Meghan getting extra cash by using her friend's clothing samples is true that she would be getting a cut (they always use very flattering photos of her like you mentioned!).

If she loses the marriage she definitely needs to have enough publicity and celebrity status to stay relevant on her own.

Also I could see the new generation of royals being okay with anything that keeps them relevant rather than slipping into the background like other European royals.

Not saying I believe any of this myself - just think it's somewhat plausible conjecture for fun and we definitely don't see all that's there with powerful families :)

Simon said...

There was another blind about Megan lying to her boyfriend about her ability to have kids and it would be interesting to see his reaction when she does get pregnant. Sounds way more like January Jones to me.

tatty said...

Here goes the group think again, this time about Markle. *rolleyes*

tatty said...

How old is January Jones’s kid now?

tatty said...

Laura Linney?

tatty said...

Lauren London?

JL said...

Jeremy Piven. But then again, Claudia Schiffer has been getting papped a lot lately.

SophiaPetrillo77 said...

Blah blah poor January.
As long as the baby daddy isn't Hamm. I still want to believe that he is one of the few decent guys left in HW

Julie said...

Lucy Liu had a surrogate baby a couple years ago?

mercyprosperity said...

I would say, Meghan Markle...she has more skeletons in her closet than a haunted house. Pretty sure she's already separated from Henry. They haven't been photographed together in public in weeks.

Unknown said...

Alrighty then.......WHO??????

Jane Hanoi said...

hamm isnt a decent guy.
didnt he haze a the fraternity iniates at his college and get caught and arrested? wasnt he the pledge master?
he’s just another sicko that its in perfectly with the rest of hollyweird

OhMama said...

Janet Jackson??

K.T. Verclempt said...

not Markle. January Jones and either Vaughn or Jason Sudekis

L Zabel said...
This comment has been removed by the author.
Unknown said...

y'all don't know its Khloe Kardashian

Freckles said...

Jamey Jackson is what I thought right away. I'm old

Gator said...

Jone's baby was never a secret, just the father.

MyTwoCents said...

YES!!!

Kay said...

January Jones or Janet Jackson.

Speculation on top of speculation about Markle is a touch ridiculous.

Kay said...

Revision: not Janet Jackson. I don't think she's acted since Poetic Justice.

kiki71 said...

This is confusing as it says the baby is a secret... not that the paternity is the secret. January's baby is OUT THERE but the man who fathered the baby is not. I wish the wording would be better on these blinds.

The Dark Side said...

This is clearly January Jones - I don't know how people are staying MM.Any chance to drag her under the bus i swear.

MamaMouse said...

Janet Jackson and El dabarge. Longtime rumors


Sd Auntie said...

@unknown. No kidding. As long as there are people out there believing every single thing about her, the extortion will continue. Good grief. He is not all that.

diva said...

Some of y’all ain’t thinking! It’s not Janet Jackson her secret baby would be 30 if the child existed.plus Janet is primarily a singer not actress, Janet makes a movie ever 9 years on average. It’s not Meghan Markle’s. If she had a secret child, her dumbass sister would’ve dropped dime a lot no time ago.

Don balee me juh watch said...

Duhhhh it’s Drake. The mother is a Porn Star. I.e. Adult Film Actress. The baby was just publicized this year.

Unknown said...

The Markles were used as a distraction for the Royal Family so the spotlight would be off Prince Charles being linked to Peter Ball former Clergy man who is a paedophile. A statement from Prince Charles was read out on the 27th July 2018 to the Independent Inquiry into Child Sexual Abuse (IICSA). It was a five-day case study into how allegations against the former Church of England bishop were handled comes to a close.

You cannot have a King to be linked to another paedophile after another of his close friends Jimmy Saville's major paedophile scandal. So the Markles were brought in to bring headlines and to keep Prince Charles away from scrutiny. Not one person questioned why he did not appear in person and why he was allowed to write a letter instead of being under oath answering questions. So he threw the new daughter in law to the wolves. He is a lovely father in law isn't he?

https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/home-news/prince-charles-wales-child-sexual-abuse-paedophile-bishop-peter-ball-church-a8467461.html

Unknown said...

His child’s mother was NEVER a porn star

Bluejay22 said...

Janet Jackson

Amazing Quotes said...

Very Nice And Interesting Post, thank you for sharing
Short Inspirational Quotes - Gym Quotes
Best Quotes - Success Quotes
Positive Life Quotes - Image Bank
Future Quotes - حكم عن الحياة
كلام جميل - حكمة اليوم

Advertisement

Popular Posts from the last 30 days