Tuesday, October 22, 2019

Blind Items Revealed #1

September 16, 2019

This foreign born A- list mostly movie actor who came out early in his career and then tried to pretend he never said those things before finally coming out permanently a couple of years ago was hooking up with a guy at a charity bash this past weekend. I really thought he had a significant other, so this could be interesting.

Luke Evans

17 comments:

Me said...

A very small percentage of the population are homosexual. An even smaller percentage of homosexuals are monogamous.

Brayson87 said...

@Me, It's difficult to get a real number because it's all about people answering polls, some might not want to share and some might be completely closeted. So it seems like 4.5% of the US population, undoubtedly higher though. So depending on your extended family size that's some for every family.

In comparison, Jewish Americans make up about 2% of the population (with LGBTQ overlap over course).

https://news.gallup.com/poll/259571/americans-greatly-overestimate-gay-population.aspx

https://williamsinstitute.law.ucla.edu/visualization/lgbt-stats/?topic=LGBT#about-the-data

https://williamsinstitute.law.ucla.edu/williams-in-the-news/how-many-people-are-gay/

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/American_Jews

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States#Religion

AlleyKat said...

Intersectional jewish transexuals? Oy vey!

DJS NOLA said...

Hes hot as shit.. and us gays just seem to be more of the population like jews because we are in general smarter, have more money, populate the media, and on average have bigger dicks than straight guys

Habibti said...

I must be living under a rock. Had no idea he was gay. Bummer!

Sus said...

@DJS NOLA Gays aren't smarter. They tend to be infantile and shallow. You barely find gays in professions which require a high intelect. Most of them are hairdressers, make-up artists, or hold different positons in the fashion/entertaintment world: publicist, gossip writer, designer of stupid things...

From your reasoning, I infer you find Kim Kardashian more inteligent than Frances Arnold (Nobel Laureate). The first has more money, populate the media, and I bet, has a bigger bum than the average woman.

mooshki said...

It wouldn't be CDAN without the bigotry!

Brayson87 said...

@DJS, Actually the old theory was that low rates of marriage and/or children conveyed multiple economic advantages, but you all f*cked that one in the a$$ ๐Ÿ˜…

As for the d!cks you'd probably know more than most ;)

Sus said...

@mooshki You love moral relativism for sure.

@Brayson87 your theories come straight from your ass.

Brayson87 said...

@Sus, my asst does have interesting theories but that wasn't one of them.
That old theory made sense at the time, children are a known money pit and marriage/divorce is great way to lose half your money. But after marriage laws were changed people suddenly didn't get poorer, and a lot of other gay economic myths were shattered.

https://www.theatlantic.com/business/archive/2014/03/the-myth-of-gay-affluence/284570/

Brayson87 said...

@Sus, Also you write like someone with one hand up their a$$, stop using your phone on the toilet.

Unknown said...

You've never mentioned it to me and I'm usually on the bog when I comment here.
Mind you, it might explain the constant spelling mistakes.
๐Ÿšฝ๐Ÿงป

Sus said...

@Brayson87

Because there is no bias in journalism, right? You can justify every theory under the sun.

Poor thing. Your live expectancy is 15 years shorter than straights or lesbians. You have enough problems. Stop caring for my toilet habits.

Brayson87 said...

Dammit funny Unknown, add a number or get a name, there's way too many Unknowns to keep track ๐Ÿ˜…

Brayson87 said...

@Sus, The Atlantic is pretty reputable, they were one of the few places brave enough to print the Singer article, remember?
https://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2019/03/bryan-singers-accusers-speak-out/580462/

If you'd actually read the first Atlantic link you'd have found that according to a study generally gay men suffer higher poverty rates than straight men and that same-sex couples suffer greater financial challenges.

You could have used the article to help support your own bigoted position, but you were too much of a bigot to realize it! I mean even the link says "myth of gay affluence," did you not know what "affluence" or "myth" meant?

And no, my life expectancy is 15-20 years shorter because I smoke cigarettes, otherwise it's strictly women for me, not even bi.

GentleBreeze said...

Oh Brayson honey, try to quit smoking. I did 30 some years ago. Start with the morning cig. Then the daily smoke break.
Then stop socializing at night lol.

Anyway, honey if you ever want to quit. I remember the feeling of smoking. Fast heartbeat,bowels moving, always something moving with my hands.

Your wit was the reason I started commenting here. Your kindness on reader pics has earned you my loyalty.

Olive Iyes said...

@brayson87 That’s kind of impressive- we’ve been losing your kind to the gay crowd for years. I mean, intelligent, rational & very informed on celebrity current events men. Smoker too?? staaahhp. I know you’re in slim slacks somewhere not trying to smell like an ashtray. Haha, I want to argue your sexuality! ๐Ÿคฃ๐Ÿคฃ๐Ÿคฃ

Advertisement

Popular Posts from the last 30 days