Monday, June 29, 2009

Katherine Jackson Should Be Denied, Denied, Denied


Katherine Jackson is a horror story waiting to happen. Earlier today she filed a petition to become the guardian of Michael's three kids. Not only no, but hell no. This would be the worst possible thing to happen to those three kids. Can you imagine being in a house with Katherine and Joe Jackson? Those kids are already probably messed up. The last thing they need to do is be surrounded by people who I don't think care one bit about them, but are instead after as much money as they can possibly get.

See, guardians need money to take care of all the little kiddies. With three little kiddies and all the expenses, Katherine and Joe will be living really well off those three kids. The whole process works in a very similar manner to the way Britney's money is managed by her dad. He gets a fee for doing the work. The thing is that I trust Britney's dad a whole lot more than I trust Katherine and Joe Jackson.

I don't care what kind of court supervision there is over them, letting Katherine Jakcson be put in charge of the kids and their money is the worst thing that could happen in this case. She already had her chance with her kids and I think we see how that all turned out. There has to be one normal person in the family. Find that person and give them to that person. Then, if Katherine wants to visit the grand kids she can do that. I bet she won't though when she realizes she won't get money for seeing them for a few hours on the weekend.

Right now she has been granted temporary guardianship until August 3rd. Between now and then a court investigator will go look at the Jackson house and interview the kids. The older ones will get a say in what happens to them. Please, oh please do not let this woman get these kids.

95 comments:

nancer said...

well, what do you propose? right now, i'm less concerned about the money than i am these kids----who are they comfortable with? if they have a good relationship with their grandmother, then why shouldn't that be the most important thing to consider for RIGHT NOW?
would you rather they be separated and 2 go with their bitch criminal mother who sold them and the other goes.......where?

he never should have had these children. they're ruined already---have no friends, have never gone to school and have been in the care of a nanny while their 'father' was too drug damaged to care for them.
there are no good solutions here.

jax said...

give them to Janet and Jermaine Dupri!

i agree- Joe should not have any access to these kids and if MJ were alive to hear this , he'd fucking die all over again!

plus...Katherine and Joe are OLD.

Katie said...

joe jackson is the moron, katherine jackson is actually pretty nice and normal. and the two of them have privately led seperate lives for the past few years. i would have no problem with the kids going with katherine except that she is already 80 and if she dies in the next couple of years, the kids will have to go through being uprooted all over again

robert said...

Yeah, I was thinking the major damage has already been done. Are any of his siblings normal or closer than not to it?

Jenny S said...

Maybe Rebbie is a good fit. After all, she raised Janet's secret child and we haven't heard any freaky news about her.
As for Grandma raising the kids, I think it is a terrible idea even if it wasn't the Jackson family. One reason I haven't listed my parents as someone to raise my kid if anything happens to me, is because they are old. I can't imagine how my kid would feel after losing a parent then their guardian. They need to find someone relatively young and relatively sane to raise the kid. Hopefully, someone will request that a guardian ad litem is hired to advocate for the best interest of the children.

MontanaMarriott said...

I agree, Rebbie would be the best fit for those kids, her own children have turned out well.

cajun cutie said...

Janet and Jermaine Dupri are on the outs right now. Give them to Rebe since she has raised a bunch of the Jackson kids already.

Pookie said...

isn't there a will somewhere? wow. how sad for those children...

Quintessential, where are you? what was that about katherine and joe living seperately? (are they still married?) if that's the case, maybe it's not so bad that katherine have them.

Mika said...

the nanny should take them

Mooshki said...

Will the kids even have any money? Wasn't Michael $400 million in debt?

"She already had her chance with her kids and I think we see how that all turned out."

Exactly.

RocketQueen said...

If you're to believe what's being reported on DListed, Debbie doesn't want the kids.
Lol @ "I trust Britney's dad a whole lot more than I trust the Jacksons" - wow, we know that isn't saying much!

Kristen S. said...

Joe Jackson's abuse has been well-documented and he's ADMITTED to "whipping" his kids. I really hope they're not granted custody.

not on my dollar said...

Wow! Enty talks about Katherine as if she's as bad as Joe. I've only heard kind words spoken about her so I don't know why the thought of possibly raising the kids alarms him.

If it was about her age I could understand and would agree.

I also agree that Rebee is the only person who seems grounded but all of this is pure speculation.

I do hope it will work out to the children's advantage no matter who gets custody of them.

I remember being skeptical of Larry Birkhead when he got custody of Anna's daughter but he seems to be okay.

So I hope whoever gains custody does right by the children.

Nutty_Flavor said...

Nice looking kids, without their masks. Is that blanket in the corner?

You know, nutty parents can sometimes raise relatively sane children. Frances Bean seems okay.

not on my dollar said...

If Joe isn't living with Katherine would Enty still feel the same way about her?

Maybe without him around the children won't have to worry about being abused.

Moosefan said...

I hope that these children will have some sort of a normal life. Debbie Rowe has already made it clear that "she does not want them, she is a mother to her animals" Nice one bitch. Not bad enough from whatever they had with Michael but the woman who gave birth to them-Nice. Pretty easy to talk about it now that the money ran out and she thinks that there may be some coming her way.
I am hoping that all of the grown Jackson children will make sure that Joe does not get his hands on anything that is theirs-now or future.
As for Joe-as I watched the interview of him at the awards thing last night-for him to start talking about his other projects and things he has working on-that just goes to show what we have known all along-His children were his Cash Cow. I am sure that Joe Simpson and Dina Lohan were taking notes and hanging on every low class word coming out of his mouth. Payback is a bitch Joe.
Let MJ be at peace.

cibele said...

Well, maybe she's not bad like Joe, but common, she was there when Joe was doing all the terrible things we know. She's, at least, condescending.

Sue Ellen Mishkey said...

In all honesty something about those kids give me the creeps. They have children of the corn eyes.

Babs said...

Maybe Angelina or Madonna could buy them. That would certainly solve the money grubbing situation ala Joe, if they offered him enough money. And, isn't it getting to be time for both those women to buy some more kids?

vitazza said...

I don't know what to think I only thought Katherine would be a bad fit ...BECAUSE OF JOE!!! She never gave me the “Money Grubber” feeling.....IDK... I would just hope that the children can live somewhat normal lives now that MJ has past. Perhaps if the Nanny can stay with the children regardless of the person with custody things would transition smoothly for the three wee ones

Mooshki said...

Give 'em to Lisa Marie Presley. She's Michael's ex, and she sure knows about being the child of a famous parent!

GladysKravitz said...

Michael K. just reported that News Of The World MADE UP that interview with Debbie Rowe, the oldest two kids' mom.

Not that I want them to go with her anyway, though--first, it would split the three of them up and that's not good, and second, she sold them to Michael already and shouldn't get the opportunity to sell her kids twice.

I'm voting for the anonymous sperm donor. Or the surrogate mom to Michael Prince II (Blanket's real name). At least she hasn't stood at the side of a stage recently with a belt in her hand (hello Joe).

shazzzba said...

OMG........WHAT A TOTAL MESS...
THE AGE FACTOR ALONE SHOULD SHUT OUT JOE AND KATHERINE......
WHERE IS THE WILL ????
DIDN'T MICHAEL MAKE ANY PROVISIONS FOR THEM ?
WHAT ABOUT INSURANCE ?
RIGHT NOW MORE QUESTIONS THAN ANSWERS...

Miranda said...

Seriously, give 'em to Angelina. She's got all the money in the world and more love than any child could ever need! :)

Emma31 said...

off topic...just imagine the stories that these kids could share on what went on in that house...

Anywhoo...I can't help but think that Katherine is not a good fit and Joe "dirtbag" Jackson is definitly NOT a good fit. I feel bad for these poor kids but there nothing but $$$$ to people and thats just sad.

Little Miss Smoke and Mirrors said...

How many extra bedrooms does Larry Birkhead have?

jax said...

i read that MJ saved a catalogue of about 200 unreleased songs for the kids to live off of to a tune of $120M.

i'm glad that was NS about Debbie Rowe, no kid wants to google their 'mom' one day and hear she didn't want them and that they weren't really MJ's kids either. i mean we all thought it, but hearing it from your bilogical mom would serously suck.

vitazza said...

ahaha hahaha Lil Miss Smoke and Mirrors!!!

jax said...

oops that was meant to say BS not NS.

JoElla said...

Joe and Katherine do not live together.. they haven't since the 90's I think.

She and the Nanny have been constants in their lives.

Sierraton said...

If Katherine couldn't protect her own kids against Joe "way back when", who's to say that she could protect her grandkids from him now? If Katherine and Joe ~are~ now living separate lives, maybe it ~could~ work, but that sounds like a big gamble to me.

Give the kids to Rebbie, I say.

Little Miss Smoke and Mirrors said...

That's the second time I've heard mention of Rebbie. Who the heck is Rebbie?? I'm serious, never heard of him/her.

Clanger said...

Maybe Octomom would like some more help around the house? (JK) ;)

I think Katherine is getting a little too up there in years. I would be scared something would happen and then Joe would step in. Not good! Glad to hear Joe and Katherine don't live together. Let the Nanny finish raising the kids - she has done it this long anyways, the kids probably look to her as their Mother figure anyways. Give them some continuity and stability.

Paisley said...

Katherine is 79. She would be 90 when the youngest graduates high school. I don't care how much she loves them, she's too old to parent them. Let one of the aunts or uncles take them. Katherine will always be their grandma.

vitazza said...

Ah, REBBIE is the older sister....
I beleive there were only three girls REBBIe, Latoya, Janet!!

not on my dollar said...

shazzzba, I heard a report on the news that even if Michael named a particular person in his Will to take care of the children it holds no weight.

The comment was "the kids are not property" so he doesn't get to decide in the event of death.


Little Miss Smoke that was a funny comment about Larry B. but when you look back on it there was so much commotion with Anna's daughter and now it worked out perfectly with the biological father (whom Anna wanted to keep out of the child's life).

BigMama said...

The most disturbing thing to me is the faint sound (heard all the way down here in the south) of Jackson family members running to thier local publishers to ink deals for tell all books. *sigh* Latoya probably had hers written years ago.

Hopefully, those children will be placed with someone who will at least have the forthought to take them to a therapist.

Jade, That Girl said...

Regardless of who these kids go to, they are doomed for an abnormal upbringing anyway...half of their childhood has all ready been quite abnormal, even if all michael made them do was wear masks when they go out. That's enough to damage a kid, I think.

You know what they say...the Jackson's put the FUNK in dysfunctional!

not on my dollar said...

BigMama, Latoya wrote a tell all in the 80's (which I bought). I guess this would just be part two.

Idiot Watcher said...

@ not on my dollar -

Katherine is a spineless enabler with less than zero judgment for allowing Joe to abuse her kids, continuing throughout their adulthood, and never telling him to go to hell. She couldn't protect her own kids, and she can't (or won't) protect Michael's.

I heard that Michael had wanted the kids to live with the nanny. Makes sense to me - only mother they've ever had.

BigMama said...

watch it turn out that the nanny is the mother of Blanket....

I forgot Latoya wrote a tell all, I am sure she "forgot" some stuff that will all of a sudden become relevant now that Michael is dead and can't sue her.

Kris said...

Not trying to creep people out, but the boy reminds me a bit of Aaron Carter and the girl reminds me of Rashida Jones.

Anyway, I heard what JoElla had heard, that Katherine does not live with Joe. Also heard that they had actually divorced very quietly years ago.

nancer said...

remember these kids have no genetic link to the jacksons at all. he didn't even contribute his own sperm.

but what has to be the utmost priority is placing them with someone they know and have a relationship with. gramma will do for right now, and then if there's a normal jackson, maybe with them.

they just MUST be kept together. they've suffered enough and they aren't even old enough to know it. SAVE THE CHILDREN!!!!!

and YES, there will be money to fight over and it will follow the kids. the court will make sure they are provided for while the creditors are sorted out. and remember, MJ is making more money right now---since he died---than he had in a long time so some of his debt is being relieved.

MommaBear said...

Liza Minelli should get the kids. Then TCL would give her a reality show about raising Michael's kids. What a glorious train wreck that would be to watch.

Lisa (original) said...

Mooshki, Lisa Marie Presley would only turn them into Scientologists, and thus mess them up even more! One thing this world does NOT need is more Scientologists!

BigMama said...

LOL, Mommabear! Somewhere there is an exec saying "hey! There is an idea! We can call it Raising Jacksons and have the whole family involved." I can picture drop ins now from Latoya to take the kids on crazy adventures to the mall or the movies....ya know, normal stuff.

Margaret said...

LOL, GladysKravitz, "I'm voting for the anonymous sperm donor." I spit my coffee.

Harriet Hellfire said...

They can just move back in with Michael when it turns out he isn't actually dead but faked it. *L* No, I don't quite believe those rumours, but on the other hand, it wouldn't really surprise me either.

Cheryl said...

Shared custody with Corey Feldman and Macauley Culkin sounds right to me.

You youngin's might not remember Reebie's song Centipede. The video got some play on New York Hot Tracks back in the day.

vamp said...

i think there is a lot of we dont know that is pure speculation...i dont know anyone who is "normal"...in fact people who seemed to have picture perfect upbringings can turn out messed up and i dont think it is fair to judge anyone...so many stories have come out and at this point we dont know what is true...also grandparents treat their grandchildren with more compassion than their own children in most situations...this whole thing is tragic...

Carrie S. said...

I believe Katherine is a Jehovah's Witness; supposedly because of her strong beliefs the kids kept secrets from their life on the road with their abusive father Joe to protect her. However, I just don't believe there were not signs; I think she just chose to ignore them. I've known several JW's who stay in abusive marriages because it's part of their belief system that it's somehow deserved; the male is the authority figure and knows best how to do everything.

I agree with many posters that Rebbie seems to be the best choice at the moment. You need someone with a good track record, plus she's kept out of the spotlight and managed to lead a normal life in comparison to the rest of the family. I also don't see her taking any crap from her family or abusing any privileges that may come from raising the kids of Michael Jackson.

TinselSass said...

Mark Lester...

http://tinyurl.com/nkn2zw

Seems like MJ had at least one true friend not on his payroll.

nancer said...

i don't know about mark lester. he's the only person i've heard of who knew MJ that claims cluelessness about the drugs.

i'd say the best 'friend' i've heard speak is deepak chopra.

anyone who didn't know jackson was a drug addict really couldn't have been facing reality or they're lying.

not on my dollar said...

Tinsel, I remember reading on Thursday or Friday that Mark didn't want to raise the kids, now I hear he's extended himself to them.

I don't get the feeling that anyone WANTS to raise these children because anyone who knows Michael is aware that they've lead an abnormal life and this is going to be difficult convincing the children to adapt to a normal environment.

Michael may have taught them to weary of everyone except him.

Little Miss Smoke and Mirrors said...

Vitazza - thanks for info. I had no idea there wad a third Jackson sister!

selenakyle said...

Those kids don't look one IOTA like any member of the Jackson family.

I read that Debbie Rowe said they were conceived with a sperm donor--that MJ was not the biological father to them.

Superwife said...

Wouldn't Michael's will (if there is one) decide who will get the kids? Seems like petitioning for the kids is a moot point.

"joe jackson is the moron, katherine jackson is actually pretty nice and normal."

Someone who is so called normal doesn't sit by while their spouse beats and fucks up their kids. She's an enabler.

selenakyle said...

I still can't believe what kind of dick would name his kid Blanket.

selenakyle said...

And there can't be one IOTA of Jackson family blood in those kids! (they're very nice-looking, no question).

not on my dollar said...

selesnakyle that's the kid's (Prince Michael II) nickname.

selenakyle said...

oooh, sorry for the repeat...I thought blogger ate my post yet again...

McDooks said...

I agree with Enty. Look (just LOOK) at how all of the Jackson siblings turned out. They all have major issues, they've all carved up their faces, none of them like themselves. I won't take the time to go in to all the details readily available, but MICHAEL, Janet, LaToya, Jermaine, any of the others, they all have drama and what seems like much unhappiness in their lives. The biggest common denominator is THE PARENTS.
Those kids need to be faaaarrr away from that family. Start fresh with somebody sane and stable, not out to exploit.

McDooks said...

I agree with Enty. Look (just LOOK) at how all of the Jackson siblings turned out. They all have major issues, they've all carved up their faces, none of them like themselves. I won't take the time to go in to all the details readily available, but MICHAEL, Janet, LaToya, Jermaine, any of the others, they all have drama and what seems like much unhappiness in their lives. The biggest common denominator is THE PARENTS.
Those kids need to be faaaarrr away from that family. Start fresh with somebody sane and stable, not out to exploit.

figgy said...

I wonder why Michael didn't use his own sperm? He did *claim* they were his bio-kids, didn't he? But it's clear that those kids are about as black as I am, and oh yeah, I'm fish belly pale white.

The other question is, why choose Debbie Rowe as the bio-mom? The woman is not attractive, trashy, and clearly d-u-m. Really? He wanted those genes?

Ella B. said...

I would not be a bit shocked to see this turn into some DNA testing drama akin to the Anna Nicole case. The poor children. I wonder if they can even function in a way that we would expect normal children of their age to function, due to their extreme isolation and the probable lack of a formal education.

If they were anyone else's kids, the state would have come in and taken legal guardianship because all the parties are unable or unwiling to provide proper care.

Ms.Leigh said...

as far as i've heard, katherine and joe live in seperate states- one in ca the other in nevada. they're as good as divorced, just without the paperwork, so with that in mind i could see her taking the kids- i don't think she'd allow joe around them much. except for the fact she's 80 and what with the devastation of losing a child, who knows how long she'll be around to take care of them.


one of michael's siblings would be a far better choice, just can't decide who. can't wait to see what his will says!

lollydarling said...

"Katherine is a spineless enabler with less than zero judgment for allowing Joe to abuse her kids, continuing throughout their adulthood, and never telling him to go to hell. She couldn't protect her own kids, and she can't (or won't) protect Michael's."

Exactly. You let your husband whip your children, you shouldn't come near your grandchildren unless you're very closely supervised. You sure as hell shouldn't get custody!

AnonMom said...

I remember seeing Rebbie in interviews years ago, and as I recall, she was refreshingly normal.

There is an old rumor that one of her daughters is actually Janet's daughter.

jax said...

one of his siblings should be fine to do it...they all raised their own kids that we never hear about(a good sign) and seem well adjusted. i'd give jermaine the kids, MJ seemed closest to him next to Janet.

nancer said...

diane dimond has been following the MJ story for years. she says the sperm donor for ALL the kids is the same person and was hand picked by MJ---she said a lot of people know who it is. (i'm sure we'll all know before this is over.)

i think he wanted white kids, plain and simple. he hated himself.

not on my dollar said...

Jermaine is not a good role model for anyone. He married Randy's second wife after Randy divorced her. Also Jermaine has little one's of his own to raise and he named one of them Jermajesty so I don't think he's a safe bet either.


I would say Marlon is one of the sane ones but we also heard that he was working in a grocery store because he had no money. So if he gets his hands on any inheritance there might be trouble.

Randy's been in jail for abusing his wife.

I haven't heard any scandals with Tito or Rebie so maybe one of them should raise the children.

AnonMom said...

More info on Rebbie:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rebbie_Jackson

Quintessential Southerner said...

if i am not mistaken joe and katherine do not live together. katherine is religious and maybe she does not believe in divorce?

Caroline said...

Just give the kids to octomom or Kate gosselin and let's call it a day. No, but seriously Janet should get them, she is sweet and wouldn't be out to get their money. Someone said she and jermaine were on the outs and I wanted to find out the circumstances?

not on my dollar said...

Hey we forgot someone.

Joe Jackson had another daughter AFTER Janet by some other woman. She's grown now. Maybe SHE could raise Michael's children.

Wil said...

Ugh .. Michael really should have had something outlined with an attorney prior, huh?? Wills, insurance, trusts and details about who is to care for the children .. now without instruction .. total disaster for the children.

I don't think there will be a good solution to this one way [Jackson family getting them] or the other [Debbie getting them], if the money freaks get custody.

Best bet would be Rebbie. Here is hoping someone in a position to know such things choses that option. She seems very, very stable to me.

PJ Nelson said...

Jax I hope what you said is true about Michael leaving a catalog of 200 unreleased songs for the children...

shakey said...

There was also some news this morning that Michael Jackson recorded some songs with Freddie Mercury before he died. Now that would be an interesting duet.

I'm against Katherine getting the kids. If there is such a thing as life after death, Michael is SCREAMING right now. And Joe - what a piece of work he is. Shows up at the awards show seemingly unaware Janet is also there, and claims he and Katherine have sole custody. That man has a face that just says BEATER all over it.

For sure the nanny will get the boot. Or someone will try and throw as much dirt at her as possible to see what sticks. This is going to get NASTY, folks.

Let the kids decide.

Ells said...

Joe and Katherine are divorced, aren't they? I think Katherine was always very nice and normal. It was Joe that messed everything up. I don't know much about Rebbie, but she stays out of the public eye, so maybe that speaks of some normalcy.

Ells said...

I don't think Debbie Rowe should get them, because she is little more than a surrogate. I don't know why Michael even bothered marrying her.
Jax, Jermaine has too much drama in his own life right now with a nasty divorce going on.
I seem to remember Randy being abusive to a girlfriend years ago. Seems like Marlon and Jackie might be the closest to normal for the brothers.

Jamie's Girl said...

Great. Now Joe is going to beat the shit out of Prince Michael, and Blanket. Then he is going to sexually abuse them like he did Michael.

That rat bastard was asked last night how he was doing and his response to the CNN camera was "Great". That bastard!

Kris said...

Okay, can we let up on Katherine a bit. Please remember she is what, almost 80. Which means she came of age in the 40's or so. Women were expected to put up and shut up. Period. If he was beating the kids, isn't it likely he was beating her too? People didn't really start becoming vocal about how to deal with abuse until the 70's and 80's. Hell, look what Tina went through trying to get away from Ike.

Also, I don't think the parents can be the only cause for how messed up some of the Jackson kids... some of it you can probably chalk up to good 'ole show business. Works wonders on the ego.

Cooper's Mom said...

Kris - good point. I think that Katherine probably is the better person to take care of them. But my concern would be that she is simply too old to manage. I have no idea what his siblings are like and so can't say that they should go to one of them. I don't really think they should go back to Rowe because, essentialy, she SOLD them.. so she deserves jack shit, IMO.

Also, i too have read tha MJ has left a cataglog of 200 songs for his kids' future. Props to him for setting something aside for them.

Judi said...

I heard between 100-200 songs are in trust for the kids.
I hope the nanny stays because they've known her since they were very small and they don't need any more upheaval. They certainly don't know Debbie Rowe.
Michael has been paying for both parents' homes for a long time.
I think Katherine as guardian is fine for now but she won't be able to really raise them for very long. Rebbie and the nanny together would be ideal.
Lots of press camped out near Hayvenhurst in Encino. Traffic sucks. ~sigh~

islaah said...

Joe and Katherine are still married. They just celebrated their 60th wedding anniversary. However they are living apart. Katherine was close to Michael and lived in California near him. Besides the nanny she has been one of the only constant the kids know, even though she is so old.
I say give them to the only normal one-Rebbie. Shes living a quiet life with her husband of over 30 years. Those kids need some stability.
Joe lives in a home in Nevada that Janet brought for them. Apparently In the papers filed KAte lists her California home as her address but Joe doesnt.Years ago Katerine filed for divorce but Joe wouldnt grant her one so she just let it go. I think he hold on to the marriage because he knows thats the only was he'll be taken care of. Michael and Janet always took care of Katherine not Joe.

Cooper's Mom said...

I just re-read Entys post and he mentions that Katherine will have no interest in just 'visiting' the kids if she no longer has custody because she won't get the money... ummm, she's 80yrs old... surely at this stage she doesn't care about the $$$ she cares more for her grandkids welfare??

Also, maybe i'm just being incredibly naiive or i just haven't read every word published about MJ but has anyone ever delved into whether he molested his own kids?? I posed this question to my hubby and his response was: "ummm, unfortunately why do you think he had them in the first place..." I was a little taken aback by this, but i do know it does, occasionally, happen... Sick!

Thoughts?

selenakyle said...

Good morning on far the east coast!

Also wanted to say last night that I read yesterday the Rwandan nanny said Katherine hounded her immediately after the death about "where the money was hidden" in the house.

Niiiiicccce. Perhaps quite telling about Katherine?


Those poor kids are going to need all the help they can get, no matter who raises them.

I know--perhaps Athina Roussel's dad and stepmom could raise them--they did a good job with the Onassis offspring and that was no small feat!

__-__=__ said...

How could anyone want these kids to be anywhere around that family?!?!?!?! Why didn't they do an intervention for Michael?? Why didn't they stop the enablers??? Were they just giving Dina lessons this whole time? Those kids need to go with Debbie Rowe, all three. Kids need love. There is no denying that she loved Michael. I heard the nanny was brought to Michael by Depak Chopra but also is part of the Nation of Islam. Let her go with the kids. Let the kids visit the Jackson family when THEY want. Or give them to Larry..........

islaah said...

According to the nanny they did do an intervention but that let to her being fired, since she was the one that got the family on board for it.
As for the hidden money, apparently everything is being hidden from the family. Third parties are hiding things. Katherines an old lady that hasnt worked in ages. Janet and Michael take care of everything for her. For her to sustain and for the kids too, she needs money.
If Joe asked then I would have been suspicious but I dont think she has that on her mind. Its always been said that Michael and her was closer than anybody else, she probably just wants to take care of those kids to the best of her ability.

GoddessNow said...

Joe Jackson has not lived w/Katherine in years. He resides in Vegas, she in CA. I don't see it as prob. The children has been living w/Mrs. Jackson almost since birth anyway, they are familiar w/her. They need consistency!

amanda rae said...

I wish I could take those kids. Hell, I'd do it for free, give all the money to whoever (except an untouchable trust that they would get once they turn 18 or 21), just so those poor babies have a chance at some normalcy. It just breaks my heart to see them, motherless and fatherless, being used as pawns in some sick money grab.

Joe Jackson is the LAST person on Earth that those children should ever be around, he's the reason their father was so fucked up! I'd take those kids, raise them right, and hopefully once they were old enough to control their own money, they'd have a good foundation and good heads on their shoulders. Too bad I can't adopt them. Yeah I'm probably fucked up, but how can it get any worse for them? They just need love, support and good parenting, and it just shreds me to think that they are never going to get it. Poor, poor kids.

Angie said...

Joe Jackson is s crook and child abuser.....

Is there actually a "normal person" in the Jackson family? They would be better off with the nanny. Get these kids in therapy!

This is absolutely gut wrenching.

Angie said...

MJ's estate will be far more lucrative in his death.....that mounting debt will surely dissolve and those kids will be multi-millionaires.

google said...

Joe and Katherine have lived apart since the 80s. they no longer consider themselves "married" but because of their religious weirdness, they are not divorced. the problem i see is her age and also bringing kids into a home which has such weird religious beliefs. being JWs hasn't helped any of the jacksons yet.

whitneyklos said...

Whoever wrote this page of nonsense must be out of his mind!!
Having their family (escpecially their grandmother) take care of them is better than them getting send to their mother or other relatives.
reason 1:their mother has a billion pics of her pets(not her kids) all over her walls!!
reason 2: They rather end up living with their grandmother (maybe grandfather)who are able to be there for them, than all the other relatives who have kids on their own or travel a lot.
And by the way what is wrong with Katherine Jackson being "religious" maybe it helps them get over the death of their father.
And siriously would you prefer seeing the kids do drugs or going to church.

My Grandparents are my guardians too, not only that but I had to come here all the way from germany!!
And I am dealing with my life better than I would've if I had been with any of my other relatives!
And I am only 13!Not much older than prince!

So whoever wrote this article or whatever it is, should try to look at the situation the way the kids look at it!

Advertisement

Popular Posts from the last 30 days