Tuesday, November 24, 2009

Demi Moore & W Magazine


Pop Culture Madness has a great picture and article on their site. It is the picture above and they have found some quotes from various sources and their theory is that Demi Moore didn't ever actually wear the dress on the W Magazine cover but that it was taken from this shot on the runway and put on her body.

The website communicated via Twitter to Demi and asked Demi if the photo of Demi came from the camera. The site was ignored and the question not answered. They also have another link which you can find here which breaks down the cover shot in detail. Thanks to everyone who sent me this picture.

31 comments:

Lolita Breckenridge said...

I hate fakery. Thanks Ent! Just in time for Thanksgiving eating. . .

Linnea said...

It will be interesting to hear her response.

MnGddess said...

Gee, the arms and legs are in the same position......

jax said...

YESSSS!!!! LOL...
Demi, you fake ass bitch. you lie lie lie. how sad and pathetic.

empyrios said...

anytime she does a movie she phones it in so this wouldn't surprise me, lol.

amazonblue said...

What are the guidelines for truth in advertising? At what point does this qualify as fraud? Magazines depend on the cover photo to sell issues and such blatant photoshopping should be unlawful.

When advertisers are selling a product, say a Butterball turkey, they actually have to feature the actual turkey product. It can't be an imitation, that's against the law.

How is this different?

ItsJustMe said...

Whoa!!! Just as I was thinking about how airbrushed she is on her perfume ad ... she looks like a freaking cartoon in it!

Pookie said...

owned!

RocketQueen said...

Wow. And she even DEFENDED that pic before this came out. So much for honesty. So now do we believe she hasn't had any work done as she claims?

Enny said...

The legs and feet are clearly not hers, either, but the model's.

Seachica said...

So is DM the MV of modeling? :)

Merlin D. Bear said...

@Rocketqueen: Demi has had work done! Say it ain't so!

Next you'll be saying that Britney lip-syncs!
And that there's no Santa Claus or Easter Bunny!

Anonymous said...

I knew it was not her body. Especially when she looks a little heavier on some of the pics that she comes out with Asston lol.

Virtual Boricua said...

How about all those print and television Mascara ads with models and actresses like Eva Longeria and Queen Latifah batting fake eyelashes and false promises of instant "fullness and body?"

Ms Cool said...

So wait - does this mean the magazine photoshopped a MODEL's body? As if a model's size 0 hips are too big. That is too bad. Demi Moore doesn't need to be photoshopped or have her body replaced. She's always been beautiful and needs to knock the plastic surgery off, too.

.robert said...

The fakery does not bother me. They use fake food in food mag and such all the time. It is the outright lying that is upsetting to me. As if people are too stupid to put 1 and 1 together.

canadachick said...

Well if she tries to say its her, then she's sending a horrible message to her 3 daughters.

Maja With a J said...

As far as plastic surgery goes, I do wish celebs would just be honest about it...but in her case, who cares? She looks amazing, and she doesn't look like she has had any. She doesn't have that tight, frozen look, but looks natural. So, if she has had any work done, I need her surgeon's number. And also, some money.

Sporky said...

I don't know why they wouldn't just use a real picture of her. It's not like she's in any way overweight. I'm so sick of all the photoshop phuckery.

blog hopper said...

Unfortunately in advertising, most of what you see is fake. Take food ads- they pay hundreds of dollars to have a food artist come in and create something that isn't even edible look like something yummy. Whoppers anyone?

:)

Unknown said...

That's the worst case of magazine cover body snatching since the Oprah/Ann Margaret scandal of '89.

whole lotto luv said...

Ms Cool said...

So wait - does this mean the magazine photoshopped a MODEL's body?


Ms Cool, I don't think the photochopping of the model was to slim the model, but rather to take the photo, in which the model is walking, and alter it so that it looked like Demi is standing. I think that's why "Demi's" left leg and hip didn't seem to match up correctly.

Demi tweeted: "my hips were not touched don't let these people bullxxxx you!" Her hips weren't touched; they were someone else's hips altogether.

But now Demi's not tweeting. Fux her. She can go party her old ass off with her good buddy chris brown.

Mango said...

I do not mean to defend Demi--trust me on that (I think, while beautiful, she's one of the world's lousiest actresses) maybe she did wear that dress for a shoot and assumed that a resulting photo was used as the cover photo.

She's in great shape, (as she should be, with all the time in the world to exercise and all that money for plastic surgery and touch-ups), so I don't understand why she would knowingly use another model's body. She's vain and thinks she's pretty damned hot herself. I'm kinda wondering if she got snowed like we did.

selenakyle said...

HA HA HAAAAAA. We knew that wasn't really the dumb c*nt on that cover without a shitload of retouching.

And her Tweet about "don't believe the BS..." which in itself was pure BS! Hah!

She's fine and gorgeous just being herself--why buy into all the GD cheap tricks?


I mean, if Demi-frikkin-Moore can't sell magazines, all women are dooooooommmmmmmed.

"Fashion" magazines will never make another dime off me.

Sinjin said...

BUSTED!
LOL @ jax's comment :-)

jax said...

harriet, oh she has! she reportedly spent over $200 000 before Charlie's Angels to give her thatbeach body. one thing was a 'knee lift' FFS!

BlahFrickinBlah said...

people crack me up! "she looks great and doesn't need all those surgeries!" of course she doesn't because she had them already! if you and your doctor are smart, you are going to go with the small, subtle changes like a maint. program...not an overnight overhaul. We all have to remember too that she dropped out of Hollywood sight for a good many years there when she "transformed" pre Asston. Looking that good doesn't come cheap. DNA that good is one in a billion. I'm sure Demi's is helpful but not solely responsible for her present looks. No fuckin way.
This photoshop fuckery is getting way out of hand.

Donna said...

I am sure that there will be ZERO response from Demi and her camp. Pathetic. Just pathetic.

Marie said...

I have to say, I don't think they're the same picure. If you look at them blown up the swimsuit is sitting differently on the both of them. The lines across the torso look different, the shoulder pad thingies are different, the wrap's folds are different, Demi's boobs are bigger, the legs and arms are in different positions...

Basically it looks like Demi is standing with her weight on one leg which gives her the same kind of angle as the model, and she has the same waist size. If it was the same picture it wouldn't look fuzzy when it was layered.

Demi doesn't need to use a models body, and she knows it. And as for her looking bigger in pap shots - of course! If you had a photo shoot coming up wouldn't you watch what you are for a bit before hand? Jeez!

Enny said...

No, the legs are the same legs. Just look at them! Look at the left knee, now the right. Trace down the legs. Same shape, same size, same position, look how the back foot is dragging in exactly the same way.

Marie said...

The knees are the same because they are the same legs. They have layered the two images to show how similar they are, but Demi's picture ends above the knee. Anything below the knee is only the model's photo. That's why the legs are perfectly in focus to just above the knee but not from mid thigh up, because they're not the same picture.

Advertisement

Popular Posts from the last 30 days