Monday, March 11, 2019

Blind Item #14 - Mr. X

Which relative of that deceased iconic performer who has been in the news quite a bit lately, has been pretty much ignored by the mainstream media because the powers that be funding that documentary want their narrative to be the only narrative? Her timeline of events concerning someone featured in that documentary throw serious doubts on his story and make him look like a liar and throws the films accuracy into question. She was booked on several morning chat shows to present her side of the story but they were canceled at the last minute. Now that she has told her side, several shows are reconsidering their options and are willing to book her. 

96 comments:

MDAnderson said...

Latoya??

Zuzupetal said...



Presley?

Tricia13 said...

MJs niece/Wade

Zuzupetal said...


omg your'e right MD, Latoya

cheesegrater15 said...

Detective Latoya?

Tricia13 said...

Brandi Jackson

sandybrook said...

Or because Latoya has no credibility about anything?

hothotheat said...

Say what you will about LaToya, I watcher her on Celebrity Apprentice and she seems sweet. I'm also ashamed I watched that show now 😨.

Perfumista said...

It would be wrong if the documentary is filled with lies, but at the end of the day there can be no doubt he was a child molestor. Take his behavior and apply Occam’s Razor.

omfg said...

It can’t be Latoya, she’s not throwing doubt on wade,she threw Michael under the bus. It’s MJs niece.

Elphin MacSkye said...

I have another source from Europe that is several years old, and it lists many, many more "special friends." He was a pedophile. A fellow pedophile wrote a book about MJ, and NAMBLA reviewed it in 2013.

Murph said...

https://rollingout.com/2019/03/10/michael-jacksons-sex-abuse-accuser-is-lying-says-mjs-niece-who-dated-accuser/

“It’s something they’ve conveniently left out of the documentary because it coincides with Wade saying [the abuse happened] from the age of seven to 14. But he was dating Brandi from nine to 18.”

Yeah Ok, because no way the "dating his niece" at age NINE was a con job put out there to keep media from sniffing around MJ's relationship with a kid. I doubt Brandi i being put up for this by the family either, since all they care about is the "truth" /sarcasm



Florence Harding said...

Yeah, because Michael's relatives would never lie to defend him! Why are you defending a child molester and attacking his victims?

Nina Ross said...

Brandi Jackson... wade’s ex-girlfriend

:| raven |: said...

i found Wage and James to be completely believable.

i think the part that got to me most was their mothers and how they have completely destroyed by the fact that they LET their children be with MJ and never questioned it and how now, both mothers are relatively estranged from their sons and their families.

if it was all fake .. WHY would there be such animosity against the Moms? i believe every bit of it.

and who cares if one of the boys was dating someone. that does not mean the abuse was not on going AND there were plenty of periods of time in between when they were not in contact with MJ because he had a new "young boy" in his midst.

Strangertruths12 said...

Say whatever you will about either Wade or James but no one is disputing Michael's sharing of the bed with MANY young boys over many years. If anyone thinks there is anything REMOTELY normal about that, you're insane. Nothing about that adds up to anything good. Damn near everything about that points to something very wrong. He was a grown man and they were young kids. Whether parents knew or not, it's not right. And FTR I don't think either of those guys are lying about what happened. Things happened.

Unknown said...

MJ was married to women as he was abusing boys - if anything these boys having girlfriends makes perfect sense to cover the abuse up. Especially as a Jackson family member so explains nicely why Wade was at Neverland.

Unknown said...

What is the book Elohim?

Unknown said...

Elphin

LooLooEasy said...

So a person cannot have a boyfriend/girlfriend and also be abused at the same time? Wut

One thing has nothing to do with the other. Ask Jackson's relatives that are defending him if his estate pays their bills. They are protecting their only source of income.

Angela said...

It looks that we have two conflicting sources here about the documentary.

We have one series of blinds that is about blaming the people who support Jackson and wash him of all accusations. Corey Feldman, Wendy Williams, etc.
And the other series is basically about accusing Oprah Winfrey and David Geffen to have produced a documentary filled with lies to throw Jackson under a bus and to kill rumors about Geffen. Here, Lisa Marie, James Safechuck are telling the truth, with the niece being a new source for dispelling the lies, Rose McGowan is branded a hypocrite, etc.

It was as if the site was torn between getting on the Jacko is a Paedo train and the "David Geffen is the kingpin of all child molestation in Hollywood, and Jackson is just being sacrificed to take attention away from Geffen's many crimes."

And the latter theory makes zero logical sense. The documentary puts mostly emphasis on the journey by the two boys who spent time with Jackson until their realization that their relationship with him was abusive and that they had been molested. It's more about the time and effort it takes for these buried memories to go back to the surface. It doesn't claim that Jackson is the only pedophile in the entertainment industry and that we should never talk about Geffen.

It's basically as if a bunch of Jackson supporters refused to discuss the actual accusations made in the documentary and to dismiss the words of the two grown men, to put it all on a conspiracy orchestrated by Geffen, while the documentary's lasting legacy may be to contribute other former victims to come clear with the abuse they suffered and to accuse their former molester. Because, these Jackson supporters assume the entire world revolves over Jackson and the terrible people who supposedly want to destroy his reputation.

Vita said...

Yes, I agree,Tricia,omfg, and Murph...It's MJ's niece.
I also agree that she could have been just a "front" for the rest of what was happening at the time to Wade, so whatever she has to add isn't going to be a vital factor, and has no bearing on Safechuck's or other boys' stories. I think the fear,secrecy and general mindgames of being told they are the loved, special, chosen ones are dynamics of a relationship with a molester (not to mention one who is a celeb idolized by millions) that could completely create the confused, troubled personalities and behaviors of these two men over the years. I had a chance to watch the second part and the Oprah After Interview this weekend. It's all sad and disturbing, but I think there is a lot of brutal honesty in there (regarding their love of Michael, their fear of his and their lives being ruined if they testified vs. Him, Wade even speaking of a sad jealousy when another boy started being the one taken into the closed bathroom) that I dont think they'd bother to concoct. In both the doc and after show, they freely admit to the "blinders" they wore to testify for or stay quiet about Michael vs. The other boys. Sometimes f'd up situations dont come with pretty explanations.

Florence Harding said...

You know this site is fake because the blinds he does completely conflict with each other.....he'll do a blind saying that Michael was indeed a child molester, then do another saying the accusations are all lies. LOL! Pick a viewpoint and stick with it.

missjewel22 said...

The book is Michael Jackson's Dangerous Liaisons, by Tom O’Carroll.

MDAnderson said...

This is a Mr X blind who is clearly an MJ supporter and believes that the documentary is a hit piece orchestrated by Geffen/Cher/Weinstein/tmz/Oprah. Wade and James are liars and so on to Mr x. He’s allowed to have his opinions but using it for blinds is just weird.

Muckduck said...

Exactly..when my nephew stays the night he does not sleep in our bed ever. We may watch a movie in there but he sleeps in the guest room period.

HouseOfDoozer said...

Yes that was the clincher for me too. Wades mother was obviously destroyed by what she had done.

Angela said...

Remember the blind about the bodies that had been found near Neverland for kids who disappeared 25 years ago?

It is from last July... The site is definitely schizophrenic.

https://www.crazydaysandnights.net/2018/07/blind-item-8_23.html

Over the past several months, three attempts have been made by two different freelance journalists to access a three acre section of a multiple acre property still owned by the family of an A++ lister. Even though security in most of the property is fairly basic, this three acre section has trip wires, an armed security response and now a barbed wire fence is being built around the three acres. Superficially there is nothing remarkable about the three acres. It is empty wilderness that is parched dry much like the rest of the vast property. About eighteen months ago some wildlife was in the area and would not leave the three acre area. It was never ending and a wildlife expert was brought in to see why.

This wildlife expert was not asked to sign a NDA because the owners didn't think there was going to be a reason to have one signed so the expert investigated without having to keep their results secret. That has since changed, but for the first several days, the expert told several people what they discovered and why the wildlife was going crazy. A mass grave had been dug up by the wildlife. The owners assumed it was the bones of small animals and the area was a feeding area. Nope. The bones were human. There were lots and lots of them scattered throughout the area. The wildlife had dragged them to all corners of this area.

Apparently what has leaked out is the bodies are about 25 years old. There have always been rumors floating around that around Christmas when these bodes were buried that this at the time A+ list singer visited. Not only did he have his way with the wife of the owner (who knows nothing else and would have said something for sure), but also, as a thank you present from the owner was introduced to some young tweens who were visiting because they were homeless orphans. Things got out of hand and the story goes the bodies were buried where no one would ever look. Maybe not people, but the wildlife did.

There is definitely something there being protected that didn't use to be and for no apparent reason.

Muckduck said...

Mr. X (who wrote the blind) is a MJ supporter. Enty explains that in his podcast.

Liz Pop said...

You can date someone and still be abused.

Muckduck said...

Again..Mr X is an MJ supporter as per the podcast.

Laurita said...

Absolutely, Raven! That sealed it for me too.

Florence Harding said...

How low does your IQ have to be to be an "MJ Supporter"? He was obviously into young boys, even Helen Keller could see it.

AmesR09 said...

@Angela and @MD 100 percent. Before watching the documentary I watched 'The Tale' which is a movie based on actual events on how the grooming happens and it just opened my eyes as to how insidious the abuse becomes. I had to take several pauses while watching Leaving Neverland due to how intense it was. Even if both grown men are now lying it doesn't change the fact that there are other two boys that went on record to say they were molested. You can excuse his behavior and say "he just never had a childhood and loved making boys smile" but one can no longer turn a blind eye to the fact he was indeed attracted to young boys and probably abused them since they weren't old enough to consent.

Elphin MacSkye said...

Damn - he killed some, too. Notice how he basically raped Wade. That is an activity he never consented to, and it was violent. I knew then that MJ had the same escalation problem all sexual deviants have: they have to keep upping their dose. Murder and adrenochrome would have been right up his alley. I feel badly for Paris. They say she was very neglected by MJ. After all, she had the fatal flaw of being female.

:| raven |: said...

+1 Elphin

@Laurita - i mean even Wade's brother and sister are estranged from their mother. both moms were definitely star blind.

as a parent, i would have NEVER let my 7 year old son sleep in the same room / bed with a 30+ year old male (or even female). i don't care WHO it was.

the moms have to live with this for the rest of their lives and that is their living hell / punishment.

it was very intense to watch. :(

Amartel said...

Haven't seen many people here questioning whether Jacko was a pedophile but Jacko's beyond earthly justice. It's a little late to burn that witch. What is appalling that the people who created the conditions that led to his pervert ways and allowed his perversions to go unabated throughout his life so they and their friends could continue to profit are now CONTINUING TO PROFIT but now from the outrage about his perversions.

Mrs Libnish said...

Hmmmm....there appears to be some hardcore shilling going on in the comments. Interdasting. There is also a distinct “entry is contradictiry, therefore a liar” vibe. Perhaps he is close to the target.

AkhaldanSolo said...

I'm not sure why Enty would print anything that contradicts the fact that Michael Jackson was a very dangerous person. We do live in a very duplicitous world and there are many reasons for such the dissemination of such confusion but the one thing to remember is that this is exactly what is going on, it's all one big mind game to keep us all confused. Trust your own judgement and own instincts. Another thing we have to remember when we are dealing with stories of this nature is that even these victims are prone to huge moral struggles and mistakes because the damage they have suffered has rendered them quite dysfunctional which often compromises they're integrity. In essence this realization only reinforces the fact that they were abused. We all know Jackson was a monster but it's going to be a bumpy ride for most to come to this realization. It's definitely time to pick a side and we'll see who's side everyone's on before too long here.

Anothergrayhare said...

Is there any way to watch the MJ documentary in Canada now?

amelia said...

@Raven totally agree, the Mothers being estranged from their children is really telling to me. While watching Neverland I was really aghast at what these two mothers agreed to .As the Mother of a son, that I raised my myself, I just can't believe that both boys came from two parent families who agreed to the bullshit that was agreed to! My mind was just blown!

I was so protective I never allowed anyone to babysit my son except his two grandmothers. He laughs today at how protective I was but he also agrees that it was good parenting. At the time he didn't really feel like that because there were things he couldn't do.

Elphin MacSkye said...

There's actually a psychological term for what happens to people like those mothers, Raven, you're correct. It's actually in the DSM-IV, for what it's worth. Note that MJ skillfully chose already fracture & fragile families. He was a pedophile from even before puberty, I think.

:| raven |: said...

@amelia

i was also a single parent. and i agree 100%.

BayAreaGirl said...

Let's keep in mind that all predators exploit pre-existing weaknesses. It's true in nature as well as civilization.

:| raven |: said...

Vita - i also think that the threat of "going to jail for the rest of your life" is what scared the boys into staying nothing happened when they were younger played a huge part.

pedophiles often use threats like that (or "i'll kill your family if you tell") to ensure their victims don't tell anyone what's happening.

as they grew older, i feel that part of it is "i'm embarrassed to tell anyone because i feel i let it happen," not being able to acknowledge they were children and were unable to consent. when they are told over and over that "this is how we show people we love them" they didn't realize at first that it was abuse and with the added factor that their mothers' condoned what was happening (letting them sleep with him) they were obviously very confused.

i find the whole thing so tragic. but i don't in any way feel sorry for MJ. i realize he can't be punished now, but his family and those who were around him (the dude with the top hat, etc.) continuing to lie about it is disgusting. i get that they can't come forward and say, "hey, yea we knew" now but their actions are hurtful to ALL of his victims.

i hope that someday McCauley and Corey will be able to tell their real truths because it doesn't seem like when they were the "it boy" that they would have been exempt from his deviant behavior.



:| raven |: said...

agreed Elphin.

Angela said...

AkhaldanSolo said...
"I'm not sure why Enty would print anything that contradicts the fact that Michael Jackson was a very dangerous person."

Because traffic is what matters, not truth.

Enty's blinds have reported for years that Jackson was a pedophile, with some supposedly overwhelming evidence (for instance the bones of the kids in the story I reposted). If these reports were true, why didn't Enty share the information he's been privy to with Mr. X, allowing him to see the light? The other way around, why does Mr. X keep on posting pro-Jackson stuff (I believe that he's sincere about that) on a blog that's otherwise very opposed to his hero and implied he had killed children?

What counts for Enty is to publish an outrageous story, either topping previous rumors on Jackson or suggesting that he was innocent and that he's getting framed beyond the grave by some really evil people... like Gayle King. Whatever the pitch is, you'll get strong reactions, a lot of comments and some traffic and page views, as it will attract both supporters and detractors here.
For Mr. X, it's an opportunity to defend Jackson and to undermine the various opposite stories that circulate.

But none of them gives a damn about determining if what they write is true.

:| raven |: said...

O/T

and on a lighter note:


have you all seen this?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qAtvxFFsoeg

i. just. can't.

orangesoda said...

How anyone tries to defend this POS still is beyond me. He diddled little boys. He might be your 'hero' and 'Thriller' might be you favorite song but let it the fuck go. Defending him now is just embarrassing.

Cat Owner said...

Read more carefully, people. This item does not contradict the narrative of the MJ doc -- it is merely reporting on a relative of NJ whose STORY would contradict the doc. The item itself does nothing to contradict the doc directly! !

As for the theory that Geffen is somehow behind the doc to clear his name, that is pretty doubtful. It IS very confusing that Oprah remains an apparent close friend of DG, but makes no sense the doc would clear Geffen. In fact, it does the opposite, by drawing attention to the facts of child predation in Hollywood in general -- so pretty bad strategy. As a survivor herself, it's hard to believe Oprah tolerates a child predator, but what do any of us know? Perhaps even she can be star-struck or power-struck.

tinydancer61 said...

No,not Latoya. It is MJ's niece and she dated one of the guys (Robson) who is accusing MJ of molesting him.

Angela said...

@Cat Owner

Mr. X multiplies the stories about people who knew well Michael Jackson attesting that the accusers are indeed lying. It's the fourth story in around two weeks. All of them involve Geffen.
It wouldn't be enough just to debunk the accusations, given that there is some pretty explosive material in them. So, he will pitch them as a campaign by Geffen, who is heavily reviled here, to clean his own name by letting Jackson take all the blame.

I agree that such as supposition makes no sense, for the very reason you mention. But we already have a lot of people here who are already pretty sure that Geffen is the Antichrist, so they will swallow it regardless of the many flaws in logic.

Amartel said...

It's pointless to get all outraged NOW, finally, after all these years. Where were the compelling documentaries and pro-victim coverage when he was alive? Nowhere to be found, just like sympathy for the (then) little boys who had been victimized by Jacko and by their parents. Just like the compelling documentaries and pro-victim coverage of people who have been/are being abused by persons who are still financially viable products today are nowhere to be found today. I guess we'll have to wait for all that ... and so will the victims. Lastly, the fact that this has been turned into entertainment is disgusting. I assume and hope the victims are getting a portion of the profits but I'll be the lion's share is going right back into the industry.

M Styles said...

Detective LaToya for the win.

Sarton Bander said...

Synopsis of Leaving Neverland by Vanity Fair

https://www.vanityfair.com/hollywood/2019/03/10-undeniable-facts-about-the-michael-jackson-sexual-abuse-allegations

MDAnderson said...

I’m sorry cat owner but Mr X blinds are clearly pro MJ and the main premise is that Geffen and Oprah orchestrated this to deflect from Geffen and Singer. You can believe that it’s a hit piece and question wade and James but don’t deny that MJ was a pedophile. You don’t pay 21 million dollars for harmless sleepovers.

cd2019 said...

Here is your answer:
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/tvshowbiz/article-6796995/Michael-Jacksons-niece-ridiculous-Leaving-Neverland-documentary.html

Unknown said...

Best comment.

Paul Saint John said...

If MJ wasn't a pedo then he successfully impersonated a pedophile personality and lifestyle for 30 years. Look, no sane adult wants to be around kids 24 hours a day, never mind sleeping with them.
Having said that, I believe the MJ documentary was released as a cover for Bryan Singer and his clique.

Just another day on this stage we call ... life said...

Last I'd read: MJ's estate pays one payment directly to his mother. She in turn pays each child a stipend from that. LaToya receives the most. I can't recall the amount, though. But, once mother dies, I don't know if it then is all cut off. I'm going to assume yes since the estate pays one gross amount to her only.

Citizen S said...

I believe the documentary 100%. Maybe some of the dates were off a little bit because they were children when MJ molested them, but you can just do a Google Image search and see when he was with each little boy. It's not rocket science.
Latoya thought that MJ was a molester 20 years ago. There are interviews of her talking about it, trying to warn everyone.

HushHush said...

@Cat Owner Perhaps Oprah was never actually molested, and it was a PR stunt. Her father wasn't charged, nothing ever came of it. It put her over the top ratings wise, and now she's a billionaire mogul.
We see what we're allowed to see.

Aquagirl said...

@PaulSaintJohn: +1

Aquagirl said...

Can we please have a Happiness Blind tomorrow? I feel as if my heart is breaking.

Aquagirl said...

+1: I find the number of people who admire Oprah really disgusting. No critical thinking skills whatsoever.

Saetia said...

Bingo

Elphin MacSkye said...

@Armatel and anyone else who wants to "stop talking bout this awful subject" - NO, WE WILL NOT STOP. You need to look inside for your own unresolved issues. This is a moment to speak out and have real discussions. I am a survivor. I was 14. I was a pretty sheltered kid, so I was very naΓ―ve and innocent at 14. Yes, we need to talk abut this. Not looking for sympathy, looking for people to open their eyes! And now, there's evidence he may have killed some kids, too? That explains the need for Propafol to sleep.

Gia said...

I don’t believe Wade. He comes across as a very disingenuous, manipulative and vindictive. I think the loss of MJs attention and that rejection was too much for him. When MJ was alive, he would show up every time he was asked. Now that he’s gone, the spotlight comes from telling lies. He’s desperate for fame and acceptance. I just don’t believe him...

hunter said...

Gia - my professional dancer & showbiz friends say Wade is a cunt bag douche canoe.

I still think he was abused but your take on his character seems accurate based on what my friends say who have met or worked with him.

Elphin MacSkye said...

@hunter: yes, protecting a pedophile will turn you into a "douchebag." In the documentary, at age 19, he admitted he was a "workaholic" and "liked to crack the whip." He's good at what he does - Spears hired him for a whole tour. Some of your dancer friends are probably people who've never worked a real job, never been spanked, or had to do chores at home. *BOOM*

Depeche Model said...

I haven't watched Leaving Neverland (yet), and I never thought MJ was a 'fun blown' pedo.
This is what I thought: MJ was clearly severely mentally disturbed, surrounding himself with young boys, sleeping int he same bed with them, there was DEFINITELY something sexual, but I always viewed him as an asexual person, so the impression I got was that he'd get off by mutual masturbation or seeing a pre pubescent willie. Not saying that's cool, still sick and disgusting, but I never viewed him as a proper rapist. Did he actually rape those boys? Is that what transpires in the documentary?

Did Latoya really insinuate MJ was a pedo? Any links? That's fascinating. Explains a lot actually, as to why she seemed so detached from the family. I also watched her on Celebrity Big Brother and found myself liking her. She seemed like broken bird, but a genuine one, while MJ (in that famous Martin Bashir Documentary) just came across as a mental case who needed to be institutionalised asap.

Cat Owner said...

@MDAnderson Oh, I know the blind is meant to support MJ, it's just that there is no actual support in it.

As for Oprah, I don't blindly admire her, or what have you (??) But simply because nobody was ever charged with abusing her is no evidence it didn't happen. The statute of limitations runs out much too quickly on these cases, for one thing. For another, I imagine the vast majority of cases are never even reported let alone prosecuted. That was certainly the case for me. It's a meaningless measure.

Aimee Morrison said...

πŸ˜‚πŸ˜‚πŸ˜‚πŸ˜‚πŸ˜‚πŸ˜‚

Insider said...

Brandy Jackson/Wade

Unknown said...

@depeche model
I just saw an old interview she seemingly did in Israel around the first court case - is quite strongly suggesting he molests boys, why would he sleep in bed with little boys all the time etc

Jane the Jobster said...

Oh PLEASE. No one denies he was sleeping in beds with little boys. No 'smoking gun' could possibly dismantle the veritable mountain of evidence. Use your brain.

Jen said...

Amazing how a suspected pedophile was allowed to adopt or ‘have’ three children.

Thorne said...

1. How do 9 year olds "date"? At that age, the only dates they have are play dates.
2. "You can't molest someone who has a girlfriend!" is some weird logic

BRAD PITT said...

deceased iconic performer = MJ

in the news quite a bit lately = MJ

ignored by the mainstream media = lisa marie

throws the films accuracy into question = big fucking surprise

BRAD PITT said...

@ Paul Saint John

"No sane adult wants to be around kids 24 hours a day, never mind sleeping with them"

well said

BRAD PITT said...

@ AmesR09

jennifer fox who directed 'The Tale' was asked did she tell the police about her abuser, prevent more victims etc

she said "no what was most important was making the film"

WTF ????????????

Amartel said...

That's not what I said, Elph. Maybe YOU should open your eyes and read for comprehension rather than confirmation bias.

Kris Taylor said...

Paris

Gylly said...

MTV interview from early 90s. Then she retracted, as per the Jackson family stance.

Original Unknown skeptic said...

Well his family will sure have a hard time explaining this away. A video of MJ buying wedding rings with James Safechuck, more corroboration for their stories. No matter what MJ stans & his lying ass family say there is a lot of proof to back their stories and it’s very clear MJ raped & molested them and others, who knows how many victims he really had, could be hundreds. https://youtu.be/RV7-HDO5zb0

Original Unknown skeptic said...

Well his family will sure have a hard time explaining this away. A video of MJ buying wedding rings with James Safechuck, more corroboration for their stories. No matter what MJ stans & his lying ass family say there is a lot of proof to back their stories and it’s very clear MJ raped & molested them and others, who knows how many victims he really had, could be hundreds. https://youtu.be/RV7-HDO5zb0

Inspector 323 said...

For a person who calls himself (herself?) a "skeptic" you sure do have a talent for inhaling horsemanure.

the claim that is made in this post is the likely one. you don't even have to go back any further than the civil suit logged by Robson (and the 2016 deposition in which he was required to provide email correspondence as evidence) to know that the story being told here is BS. it's likely that Wade cooked up the suit as a way to make $$$, fished for other victims on the Internet, Safechuck was the one who bought in, (another was attempted as found in depositions) and when his claim got dismissed, Wade tried to "fix" his own before he got caught in lies noted by the judge in summary to get around the statute of limitation... tried to pitch a book, which no agent would buy, and now we're here. I don't believe Dan Reed hopped onto this project as much as he was nominated by the true people behind it, suggested by this website.

thus far I've seen 2 non-fans (before you hurl that "MJ stans" strawman) completely debunk this TV movie with facts and fact-finding that media outlets of prestige couldn't be bothered to perform... and that's with one of them coming from the perspective that MJ is guilty! even pieces where there are legitimate questions being asked, the line "I believe the victims" is inserted almost as if the publisher is making sure that viewpoint is expressed to shield itself from criticism (and thus lost revenue). they may find themselves at loss of revenue anyway, by going with this charade as the viewing public at large does not appear to be interested nor do they believe this horsedung.

what's most disgusting here is the absolute lack of objectivity found in the press. unsubstantiated claims (ones that can actually never be substantiated as presented because one party is dead) being presented as fact, not challenged in corporate media to the degree it is, is a dangerous proposition. if Oprah says it, it is unimpeachable truth. if all her celebrity friends believe, it must be true. "You must watch", "It's time to give up Michael Jackson, for good"... these are the sales pitches for a 4 hour pedophile fanfiction where their version of events doesn't match up with historical record. claims of corroboration IN THE FILM don't even exist. it's politically incorrect to say in print, "these guys are lying", so why is no one taking the "I don't know what to believe, we only have one side's testimony and no corroboration" position prominently? an absolute embarrassment. mainstream media is no better than tabloids.

gee, you guys really thought some scary black guy killed Susan Smith's children way back when, didn't you?

This so-called "skeptic" needs to stop reading MJF***s website and start reading court transcripts and fishing for evidence that these grifters were telling truth and polluting comment sections.

the public is gullible, and the press that makes enough money to pay people is lazy. Dan Reed is scrambling to keep his story straight in the face of public challenges. the movie's inconsistencies are edited with each airing. and the reviews outside of the USA and its neoliberal, celebrity class media are more challenging than you can find.

you want to see the truth of this film, watch this. there's actual evidence to support the claims and as an added bonus, it's 3 hours, 30 minutes less in run time.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zYx0vLfpRYY

Original Unknown skeptic said...

Haha okay explain the video of MJ buying wedding rings with Safechuck that completely corroborates Safechuck’s story about shopping for wedding rings. You pedo apologists are pathetic. Keep protecting a dead child rapist, Thriller was totally worth it.

Inspector 323 said...

It does not corroborate anything. Safechuck is not identified as the child, who looks younger than the 11 years Safechuck would have been at the time of that film.

Don't take it from me, take it from the LA Times who ran the story in 1989: http://articles.latimes.com/1989-05-03/news/mn-2482_1_zales-jewelers-mustache-store-in-simi-valley

Nothing I do is as pathetic as someone who goes scavenging for crumbs that don't exist to dunk on a guy you can't refute so you accuse him of being a pedobear and a Thriller fan.

Inspector 323 said...

You pay them because the judge would not halt civil proceedings prior to criminal proceedings. And paying a settlement doesn't stop a criminal case from proceeding.

Curiously, the accuser didn't want to work with law enforcement and two grand juries refused to indict. Likely the rumored evidence that is reported as unimpeachable fact by Maureen Orth and others wasn't the slam dunk they thought it was.

Inspector 323 said...

One of her friends is Weinstein.

Original Unknown skeptic said...

That kid looks about 11 TMZ is confirming it’s Safechuck & it confirms his story. Sorry you’re defending a pedo. Keep defending child rape.

Original Unknown skeptic said...

Exactly what stupid fucking logic. Dating at 9? Who would even call it that? That family is seriously sick.

Inspector 323 said...

Thanks for confirming you have no counter argument.

Original Unknown skeptic said...

That is James Safechuck and that fits his timeline of events stop defending a pedo.

timothyjamaal said...

That says a lot.

Advertisement

Popular Posts from the last 30 days