Tuesday, July 30, 2019

Blind Item #12

I give the alliterate former actress turned royal a lot of crap. The thing is though, she is not the one responsible for which names were included in the issue and which were not. She got to pick three or four. The rest were predetermined for this type of issue. She has no interest in half those people. She would have picked a dozen A+ listers and called it a day.

91 comments:

MontanaMarriott said...

Markle again??

Tricia13 said...

Markle

Tricia13 said...

That Vogue article ....

sandybrook said...

Well yeah that's how journalism works, the staff sets up the stories and who writes them. something like the UK Vogue probably takes months to put together and get interviews for the stories.

Zebra Seasoning said...

Wondering if she'd ever even HEARD of half those people

Flashy Vic said...

A day or so ago she was going all AOC and wrapping herself in the red flag and gathering muff guzzling woke tarts by the Subaru-full.

Now she's had these concerned pink hat wearing devotees thrust upon her by the Queen?


The second is hardly likely, is it, Enty.

James Howlett said...

Hate her, hate hearing about her. She's just another talentless person young women have to look up to. #trophylife

Rosie riveter said...





Pathetic.
Even when there is zero blind to be made, here comes Enty
Duh-Duh-Dun
With a gawdamm blind.
Because, of course.


J said...

I totally disagree.

You put your name on something, you own it, especially if it turns out to be a steaming turd like the September "Fatso" edition of Vogue will be.

MeliticusBee said...

I believe this
MM would choose
Serena
Gayle
Oprah
Beyonce
Amal
Priyanka
Michelle
Kamala
Hillary
Ellen
Salma Hayek
....
and a few of those people from the magazine no one knows.
For sure - she would not have included Jane Fonda who can probably be heard screeching about how much she doesn't care, Jane Goodall who is old, weird and way less than glamorous - not even making the cover

reportedly - her instructions for the pictures only included "lots of freckles"

this shitshow keeps getting worse.

Cinemaddict said...

The Duchess of Suck-it!

Rachel said...

The blind doesn't say the Queen had anything to do with it. Likely the actual editors of the magazine were the ones that picked the rest of the names

Samantha the 1st said...

Interesting.

And please Mr. Ent Lawyer, don't let the haters get you down.

The Markle blinds are the most popular on the site.

She's 'not only' a celeb but a royal now...people need to get over it. She will be talked about. She knowingly married into the most photographed family on the planet. She knowingly wove her name into history.

Samantha the 1st said...

It's typical Vogue stuff - you will never see the grunt workers, rank and file, sweat and blood backbone of anything on their cover. Unlike the many hundreds who were invited to Diana's funeral, who were the people who don't seek glory or glamour, but do the actual work.

Samantha the 1st said...

Would Vogue let someone with no writing experience be an editor? Even a guest editor? The pieces we're told Markle did write, read like the diary of a breathless teenager.

AtlantAnne said...

Megan Markle is a mucking joke. Gah. Harry picked poorly, for certain.

Jan 15 said...

No, she is responsible. It is part of the negotiations. When you are an adult and have a position in the public eye: you are responsible for everything under your name. It is a tough line, but true.

When you ask for favours, and special treatment, you give up something. She knows that very well. She doesn't get to claim innocence. Even if she was broadsided with this, didn't she have someone help her with the negotiations? Likely not, because she thinks she knows more than anyone.

She is a grown woman who has not accepted responsibility for her own choices.

Lucky13 said...

She's only guest editor. Lots of magazines do this. Hell, metal magazines do this all the time, having bands as guest editors.

Usually, they just write an editorial about whatever's on their minds, pick 2-3 people/items to have fluff pieces written about and then a photoshoot for the cover/inner pages. 90% of the rest of the mag has already been written and edited before the guest editor(s) enter the building.

Angela said...

It happens with EVERY magazine, whatever the content or the type. A guest editor will spend a couple of days at the office, when the issue is being put together, and make a few remarks that will appear on those pages, before that they have a little editorial input if they ask to put emphasis on this particular piece instead of that particular piece, but that's about it. I once worked on a magazine issue that was guest edited by a major "foreign-born A+ musician and celebrity". I've never met him, and he definitely didn't have to read my writing.

Nutty_Flavor said...

No doubt Salma Hayek was chosen as a “force for change” because her hubby runs the company that owns Gucci, Balenciaga, Bottega Veneta, Alexander McQueen, etc. Big advertiser in Vogue.

JL said...

It’s the editor in chief’s fault Flashy. He also didn’t edit her abysmal writing (Nutty Flavor thinks this omission was vengefulness on the part of staff.) Rumor has it that his job is in trouble as a result. another example of The Markle Effect. This is why celebs who know better than anyone which way the wind is blowing are running for the hills when she comes calling. She’s poison.

JL said...

Samantha she had a blog don’t you know. That’s considered experience. Her Tig writing uses the same attempt at breezey-cool-hip voice while oftentimes making zero sense as her Vogue work.

Teachermom said...

And she loves to wear Gucci!

Samantha the 1st said...

If MM as a royal Duchess did not get to choose most of the content, did the royal family get to approve it?

Because if not, that along with the break from PW and PC groups and KP -- in past centuries it would look like they were setting up their own kingdom. That's the type of stuff royals in past centuries went to war with each other about.

Kaye said...

why the Meghan Markle hate?
She's trying to figure out her role, and she's ambitious and caring. Give it a rest Enty :-(

Acad said...

How many people care about this Vogue-Markle collaboration though beyond a tiny subclass of elites and elite wannabe? Magazine subscriptions have been falling rapidly across board. Its a dying medium like newspapers and after the leak about MM and Harry's instructions to their neighbors, I doubt MM has much popularity left for people to want to read that particular edition.

Ann said...

Salma Hayek's inclusion immediately brought me back to Enty's blinds. How she's a snob who's raising a mean girl daughter. The material girl and her brat daughter make a perfect pairing with MM.

SwishyFishy said...

I don't understand why Krab, Rosie and Sandybrook get so upset about the Meghan blinds. They never say a word about the endless Kardashian blinds, rappers, housewives, MTV celebutards, Wendy Williams and countless child molesters/human traffickers. However, say something bad about Meghan and they get all butt hurt. She's not exactly Betty Crocker, Mother Theresa and Diana 2.0 rolled into one. Everything Enty posts is for clicks. Why is Meghan off limits? She's not so sacrosanct that she poops peace doves.

Tierney said...

A "guest editor" isn't an editor at all. It's a marketing gimmick to sell advertising and hold on to readers. Pretty much everyone knows that, so pointing and screaming that MM didn't "do the job" is kind of ridiculous. Magazines died a long time ago - Vogue is just one of the last ones to lie down. I give them credit for doing whatever they can to stay out of the coffin.

JL said...

Swishy I’ve made the same point as you a number of times. If I have to suffer the endless teen mom blinds then they can put up with this much more intriguing and Shakespeare-worthy story.

Unknown said...

Megs

mooshki said...

Meghan isn't "off limits;" it's the insane level of hatred against her that is racist, and disgusting. People trash her all day, every day. As I said, she gets more hatred than the pedophiles. For what? For being a bitch? So what? What is so obsession-worthy?

J said...

Keep up the Markle blinds. Fight evil.

mooshki said...

Exactly what I'm talking about. "Evil?" Seriously?

Megley said...

She is such a starfucker wanna-be.

Gen-z99 said...

Yeah you do give markle a lot of unnecessary crap.

Gen-z99 said...

Evil??????Last I checked the royals are the ones associated with pedos,traffickers,terrorists,criminals,etc.And last I checked marrying a royal and being entitled isn't evil.

Scout said...

Rumours the past month about a 4th Kate/Wills baby.
Today...Harry says he will only have 2 kids because protecting the planet.

J said...

mooshki, maybe you think it's not evil for people to claim better "blood" and "royalty" and insist on being called "your highness," but I do.

Gen-z99 said...

Yeah the hate is getting old and pathetic,as days go by.I swear to God, these were the same haters against Britney back in 00s and they were just as ruthless.These are the same people who will like her when she has a near death experience.

J said...

lol @ all these plebes up in arms because people are mean to "her highness."

I'm sure she'll write each of you nice little notes on her royal stationary and send messengers out on noble steeds to bring you the good tidings.



sandybrook said...

I get upset with these because they are complete bullshit catering to bottom feeders. If they even had one bit of credibility I wouldn't, but Entys agenda is to get page views and decent advertising rates and you MM haters are suckers to him because you fall for it every, single time and he laughs like a hyena everyday.

Nutty_Flavor said...

Several years ago I went to a dumpy, out-of-date museum in an obscure location that showed (what I thought was) unexceptional antique furniture and glassware.

The people in charge, however, had had a stroke of brilliance - instead of showing off their collection, they covered up most of each piece with a white sheet, so you could only see one leg of an antique table (the most gorgeously carved wood leg ever) or just the bottom corner of a painting (showing an adorable little puppy). A few smaller articles were intentionally askew in their cases, like a bottle in bright red leaded glass lying open on its side.

The gimmick was, if you put it all together it added up to a puzzle - I think the idea was to solve a murder that fictionally had occurred at the museum.

Anyway, following the Meg case is a bit the same. There's a lot being covered up, but you can be sure that plenty is going on behind the scenes.

It's enjoyable to examine the few little tantalizing details that come out and put them together along with everyone else who is following the story.

RobertaJoan said...

People actually think Meghan edited the British September Vogue?

People actually think they let Meghan or even Anna Wintour put together the most important issue of the Vogue year?

Even Anna is chuckling. The slaves in jeans, cool jackets and comfy shoes are sweating in an impossibly small room cutting, aligning, watching over pervy photographers making sure they aren't attempting to rape the model, making sure advertisers aren't giving them some crap that gets everyone on the front page of the Daily News, being yelled at by Anna and Anna-minions, assuring trout-lipped, cat-cheeked women and gay men, both sporting curiously-unformed-recovering-from-a-stroke faces, that yes, pants with legs the size of manhole covers ARE "on trend", so get with it, edit the magazine. Anna points her manicured index finger at dross she wants REMOVED, without actually touching the mock-ups. The slaves back out of the room bowing without daring to show Anna their backs and close the door with a faint 'click'. The tears running down their cheeks drip-drip down their cheeks onto the dross-pages. Repeat until Anna exhausts herself and is carried to a waiting town car and driven 121 feet to her front door. Send to printer.

Reality is so much more edifying than unhinged hate. Hate is so... well... so... common. Ew.

OKay said...

@Samantha said "She's 'not only' a celeb but a royal now...people need to get over it. She will be talked about. She knowingly married into the most photographed family on the planet. She knowingly wove her name into history."

Yep, and now she can choke on it.

And @Kaye said "why the Meghan Markle hate? She's trying to figure out her role, and she's ambitious and caring."

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

HeatherBee said...

If only all of the plebs were sex workers, they would get a nice little note with a bonus banana!

Mary said...

Oh puh-lease soHO House nit Edward Enninfil and SMegma Markle are of the same pinhead mind, serving an agenda, and it’s not about empowering women

Gen-z99 said...

Hey @j your misogynic side is showing,as well know your hatred for women stems from your momma.

rabbit said...

We, in my "neck of the woods," have a couple of sayings for people of Markle's intelligence. She's as dumb as a box of rocks, and She's as dumb as a doorknob.

Box of rocks.

Doorknob.

And we all thought Harry was the half-wit.

Two half-wits do not make one full wit.
Two half-wits are double the trouble, or, continuing embarrassment/aggravation to themselves and othes associated with them.

rabbit said...

PS: Markle and Harry.

Two half-wits do not make a full wit.

It's all physics. Two dumb-shits cannot be combined into one intelligent being.

Sd Auntie said...

wring swishy fisht. we have a count down to Kardashian free February. and its wonderful. how about no more Markle Sparkle March??

Samantha the 1st said...

mooshki also said, in the SD Jr topic, that he or she finds satanism "admirable."

So...grain of salt, maybe.

satanism - OK by mooshki

Markle blinds - EVIL RACIST HATE

JL said...

Exactly. It’s figuring out the lies and eff-ery and there’s a lot of it. Y’all seem to mistake the disdain for the lying, photoshopping, social media manipulation, and general out of control ego for hate. And Sandy why do you care if it keeps your beloved CDAN in business?

Unknown said...

Too bad people don't care about real people in need in this world as much as they care about MM here. Jeez.

Samantha the 1st said...

Unknown - concern troll much.

orangesoda said...

Scrolling through these now but seriously, why are there still so many comments? Why do people care?

not a libtard said...

Nobody 'hates' Sparkles. Well, except for most of the Royals and her exes, and most people who have ever met her it seems.

People don't want to see her guillotined or quartered or disposed of. She's not important, relevant or dangerous enough to hate. All people want is for her to shut the fuck up and crawl back into obscurity, where she belongs. And she can take Handbag-Harry the dim wit, with her. He used to be well liked, now he's ridiculed and pitied. She truly is poison.

not a libtard said...

And I agree with all of those who find the Sparkles' blind interesting.
Being called a 'bottom feeder', 'racist' or worse, just because you're amused and frankly, highly entertained, by a modern Wallis Simpson saga, is more than understandable, and may I say, actually respectable pass-time celebrity gossip.

I have never watched a single episode of the Kardashians (neither do I plan to) or worse, Teen mum. I find that type of 'entertainment' to be designed for troglodytic low-brow simpletons, and yet I don't call you sandy, a bottom feeder. People are complex and have different facets, you should realise that.

So what if the public is fascinated by all of this? It's only natural, I don't see anything strange, or low, or racist or stupid in gossiping about the dumb-as-dirt prince and his d-list American ex-hooker.

And as far as I'm concerned, she's had it coming. I am sure she was advised 1 millions times to lay low, be humble, not make waves and act gracious, grateful and show humility. She doesn't listen, thinks she's better than anyone else (she's worse than pretty much most people) and smarter than anyone else (she's dumber than 99% of people and was lucky that only Harry is dumber than her), and insists on doing it her own, woke way. So she opens herself up to criticism, and is fair fucking game.

I'm not sure what she'd have to do at this point to actually gain some sympathy or fans.
Her greatest talent seems to be getting most people together, in unison and perfect harmony, in a shared disgust of her and her ways. I have never seen so many people of of different nationalists, races, social stati and general opinions, all agreeing on how unlikeable Meghan Markle is. Nothing about her likeable. Not. One Thing.

So keep the Sparkles' blind going Enty, I say!

molly said...

The princess would love to be a part of the hollywood scene. I am interested in politics and would like to see the Royal Moochers put out to pasture. It is past time. Princess Diana started the take down. Fake Princess Markle will end it. Do you really think Prince Harry is of the royal blood anyway? Babies in families have a tendency to go all renegade .......and the Royals were a might bit suspicious acting when Princess Diana got up with the Muslim!!!! Time moves on......when something positive is happening, let's be glad. Think how much money the British govt. will save.

Thorne said...

The Himmmm has been posting blinds directly to twitter lately and they are goooood. Makes me wonder whether the Himmmms don't care to be part of whatever is going on around here lately.

Duh Vogue chose the majority of the subjects, as any mag would with any guest editor. Not a scandal - just an excuse to bring up her name and be bitchy.

J said...

Hey notaibtard, I'm a libtard and I think your last post was terrific.

Bathoree said...

@thorne - how do I find them on Twitter? I’m not very TwitLiterate.

Lurking said...

https://twitter.com/M_Mount_Win/status/1145430190740463616

Picture is Prince Charles as a baby. Captioned, "A few hours looking at old family photographs. My gorgeous little man looks just like his grandpa - it’s uncanny."

HushHush said...

Now MM is going to start a clothing line, for charity. She is a walking blind.

Samantha the 1st said...

I saw that too HushHush and wondered if it would be a blind.

It's annoying because just like 'editing' a magazine when she doesn't know how, she's not going to 'design' a clothing line either. She will steal the credit from those who are actually doing the work and probably getting crap pay for it and a lot of verbal abuse.

That's what's annoying, on top of a lot of other things...And trolls, I think a lot of us are disappointed in PH also. Skipping out on soldiers (when he's a veteran himself!), to meet some movie stars. Enabling this gross vanity display that won't quit.

Samantha the 1st said...

"Duh Vogue chose the majority of the subjects, as any mag would with any guest editor. Not a scandal - just an excuse to bring up her name and be bitchy."

She's the one who keeps making 'her name' as visible as possible.

Royal life is about service not vanity or glory.

LondonGirl said...

I hate Megs because she is a basic bitch, it's not the colour of her skin, which incidently is pretty white anyways. Seen as my taxes are paying for her wardrobe I'm allowed an opinion.

Samantha the 1st said...

Lurking: I think Archie looks exactly like Grandpa Markle.

Scarlet Peaches said...

@Scout, Meghan Markle hasn’t had a period in years.

Lurking said...

@Samantha the 1st... just posting what I saw on the twitter. The picture is Prince Charles. Have a look. Most of it is insufferable.

Thorne said...

Bathoree:

Check out Himmmm (@TheHimmmm): https://twitter.com/TheHimmmm?s=09

Check out the Medium link Himmmm posted late Sunday night. You won't be sorry.

Samantha the 1st said...

MM Is only 38 - unless you've got proofs she went through the pause early Scarlet, that would be unusual to be post menopausal at 38.

Lurking - someone else asked for you to put a link or the Himmmmm twitter @ so we can find it.

I wasn't disputing your opinion or your report, though; merely sharing my own observation.

Ann said...

@Lurking that Twitter account was just closed. Too many people bothering her. I loved to read the life she lived in her head. :) Oh well lesson learned don't post her Twitter account publicly any more. It was a bad day yesterday Instagram shut down Sussex Squad Podcast's account. A couple more pro-Meghan accounts were shut down as well. I believe Lord Geidt's reach is quite long.

Lurking said...

I have a couple screen shots if anyone is interested:

Sorry it's lightshot, I don't know how to do others:

Early mornings and late nights shopping online, spending a fortune:
https://prnt.sc/omrc0g


The one with Prince Charles's baby picture: http://prntscr.com/omrc91

I found the picture here: https://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-2473011/Prince-George-christening-replica-christening-gown-1841-Queen-Victorias-daughter.html

Notice it's on the Daily Mail's website.

Lurking said...

@Ann... it was insipid drivel and trying way to hard to seem like she's adapting to the British lifestyle... country walks, beans on toast , describing things instead of people as gorgeous, and repeated lashing out at "trolls." She didn't get it quite right though. She kept saying the British countryside is this and that. Most English people I know (1/2 my family) would say the English countryside.

Did you notice how she would repeatedly say the baby, or maybe it was Harry as well, was sleeping. I got the feeling she was alone most of the time. Well, other than the brilliant housekeeper who makes delicious egg sandwiches. Ugh, can't remember the exact verbiage, but British egg sandwiches are far superior to their American cousins.

I'm wishing I had captured more of the photos. Someone should know where they were taken.

I only Lurked, never even signed into my twitter acct.

Lurking said...

@Samantha... I had never heard of Himmmmmm until it was posted here today.

Ann said...

@Lurker don't ask me how but the stupid thing is back again. It had a text box up that said the account no longer existed. I tried three times using two different links to verify. Now the account is back again. I encourage people to leave her alone and read the drivel she writes. The life she lives in her head is great fun. Her acting skills definitely need polished because no one outside of a six year old would believe her.

Bathoree said...

Thanks I will!

rabbit said...

Markle's actual age is 42.

Today on Inside Edition on-line, PH was quoted as saying something to the effect he wants to fight against racism, in the interview with Jane Goodall. PH is a dumb as a box of rocks to believe the garbage that Markle spews.

Markle is dumb, and PH is dumber. Dumb and Dumber.

EponymousAnonymoud said...

Oh go suck an egg, Rosie. ;) some of us like our sparkle fixes.

Samantha the 1st said...

Mount_Win page doesn't exist.

PC as a baby has features that are nothing like Archie's imo. Doesn't mean Archie isn't cute. PC and PW have that same nose. JMO

Himmmm twitter a bit hard to follow but loved his Ann Miller story. Always liked her.

not a libtard said...

@Lurk - that twitter account doesn't exist anymore

Jeez, there are boxes of rocks out there, shaking their heads and saying 'we're not THIS dumb'.
Which of course is more a reflection of Harry's bottomless stupidity.

Lurking said...

@ not a libtard: it come up for me. Search M_Mount_Win twitter. The person is now claiming not to be Smeg.

Samantha the 1st said...

Lurking - can you post a direct link? The one above leads nowhere.

"Search M_Mount_Win"

Ann said...

Not Lurking but they've tweaked her account somehow. Go to Twitter itself and then add (below) to the search box. Then her account will show up.

m_mount_win

Ann said...

Or because MM can't spell any better than Harry search Twitter with this hashtag- #waitercanihaveacicktail That will also take you to directly to her account.

Samantha the 1st said...

Can't search anything if not logged in so, again, can someone post a direct link? If not, fine, I'll forget about it.

Fuzzynavel said...

And we know shes always looking for merching jobs!

Fuzzynavel said...

Brilliant. Exactly. I'd love to be that fly on the wall. The baby, the fights, the family opinion, what caused william to scarf her last Christmas. I itch to know those things

Fuzzynavel said...

I had this fleeting thought a couple days ago when this broke. Marcus Anderson and Eddie, who are decent friends, had a lark at Meghans expense and said "these women are great", she said ok seems good. Cause why would they do anything less than help her. And some, more than 4, she liked cause they have similar values to hers. I'll bet shes pissed at Eddie and Marcus for setting her up. Well just a story running around my head

Ann said...

Direct links haven't been working. Today for some reason this one works-

https://twitter.com/m_mount_win/status/1156918139021660160

Advertisement

Popular Posts from the last 30 days