Sunday, September 01, 2019

Blind Item #1

Apparently Bel Air was not considered "young enough" for the alliterate former actress turned A list celebrity which is why has focused her search on Malibu.

139 comments:

Lauren said...

Sparkles is just getting more and more vile!

Aquagirl said...

MM

J said...

Lol @ moron fifty-percent and his hippo wife.

Aquagirl said...

Who is supposedly paying for this house and how can PH live in CA & still be part of the BRF?

J said...

What's great is, thanks to Elton John's miraculous technology, they can shuttle around the world without harming the environment.

Marisa said...

Why would they even allow her to buy a house in the US? Plus, I thought she was like, 45. Boca Raton, FL is more for her I would think

Aquagirl said...

@Marissa ๐Ÿ‘ ๐Ÿ‘ ๐Ÿ‘

Randaleese said...

I don’t blame Meghan. Who wants to live among a bunch retirees and has beens..

rosemary booker said...

Brits, are you aware your government is in deep crisis? I would worry less about this broad if I were y’all

Lauren said...

She’s a never was until she yachted and conned Harry. No one knew who she was until she started doing her best work on her knees and back. Now, she’s only famous by association, who is she to be so picky and uppity?

Aquagirl said...

@Randaleese: But she is a has-been. Or actually, a never-was.

Humor Me said...

i will be amazed if this purchase and move takes with without repercussions from the RF/ HMTQ.

Aquagirl said...

@Lauren: We posted at the same time.

AlleyKat said...

What crisis? Trying to enact the outcome of a democratic vote?

The EU are known to ignore democracy or keep running votes till they get the answer they want....Denmark, Ireland..

E said...

Just what CA needs--another immigrant. I assume he will be here through the legal channels...

tookiesmum said...

Who is going to pay for it? The RF isn’t going to, and Hairy’s money is tied up in trusts. Maybe they can move in with Doria.

J said...

Why, the British taxpayers will ultimately pay, with a big smile because their dirigible duchess is so delightful.

KnitWit said...

Maybe the house is part of the exit package

Sd Auntie said...

this makes her look like a fool. why marry royalty and then abdicate to live in filthy LA. Malibu has fires, homeless, pollution, gang activity and road rage on PCH! every year, there is a massive fire. I'd live in south of France or somewhere in the countryside with horses and nice scenery. PH likes to party so he may even want ro hang with coke mom.

TeeHee@U said...

Are the BRF (at tax payer's expense) allowed to have vacation homes in countries not apart of Britain Monarchy?

And, Harry is going to regret this so hard in about 5-10 years....if he hasn't already. Don't worry about her though! She will probably have stupid reality show after an Oprah special and book tour when the divorce settles and she will never go away...just like the Kardashians....and herpes.

Aquagirl said...

Supposedly there will be no exit package. She was offered an exit package to cancel the wedding. At first she accepted, then she changed her mind. She was told that there wouldn’t be another offer in the future. I don’t think they’re even legally married.

MissDavie said...

If MM was smart she would buy in Vancouver BC. Nobody would question it as inappropriate and she would have a house for when Harry divorces her and she is back working on a cable series. Most of them film up there.

Bleu said...

Jesus. As though British royalty isn't the OG Old Money.

Lulu Filona said...

Girl has been merching and scamming fees so hard since the wedding that I am sure she has built up a steady income for a mansion in LA to isolate Harry further from his family. Then, she can do tell-alls galore from her US perch. They have made themselves unwelcome in the UK so it is that or Africa, and Markles won't want to be away from glamour for more than 5 minutes so that is a non-starter.

J said...

People in oceanside Malibu are saying "but we already have whale watching."

Samantha the 1st said...

Try Larchmont, very hip youngish family type of area, Meggles.

Or try Santa Monica. Parts of it are oceanfront, and it too has a more family vibe. You will get a lot of storm damage in Malibu. Any bad weather, it tends to flood.

Harry might like Topanga better. More private, bit of a hippie vibe.

Or try the Hills, then you don't have to fight traffic all the time, you're more centralized.

Nope, a top of hill ocean view is probably what is on the menu.

Unknown said...

Malibu is kind of trashy now. She'll fit right in.

Samantha the 1st said...

Bleu - YES and old money does not spend. She is acting like the cliche new money.

Samantha the 1st said...

Aquagirl my guess is it's mainly for her and she can be a dual citizen. Some Brits use the USA as a tax dodge, or live in the USA part time. Lot of British expats in L. A., especially in its ocean adjacent cities.

They should just buy a fairly modest-priced beach house and use it for a vacation.

I think PH and PW get money from Charles' holdings, but I'm not sure.

notthisagain said...

Lol young enough? Meghan, you’re three years shy of 40...you left ‘young’ a while ago

Samantha the 1st said...

"I don’t think they’re even legally married."

How so?

Although, I think if PC and Camilla had to have 'only' a state ceremony and a C of E "blessing," then PH and MM should've done the same. MM had been married, what, twice before PH? I think the first was annulled -- did the C of E quietly "annul" the second, too?

KittensRUs said...

Fine with me, then her dumb ass's presence won't snarl up traffic closer to where I live and work. Go up to Malibu. I suggest Trancas area.

Freebird said...

Lol!

Freebird said...

+1

Nutty_Flavor said...

Personally, I love the statement that she wants to move to Malibu because she's "homesick."

Darling, you grew up in Crenshaw and moved to Hancock Park with Husband #1 or #2, depending on how who's counting.

Taking repeated trips through Malibu on the TMZ Celebrity Tour bus does not mean it was your "home."

kiki71 said...

I think they literally mean Bel Air is all retirees which BH is. Lots of older families. Malibu young is say rich 20/30/40s.

Aquagirl said...

@Samantha: I didn’t watch the wedding...just saw snippets of it. When it comes time to sign the registry, she signs, and then when it’s his turn, he holds the book in a certain way so that you can’t really see what he’s doing. I don’t think he ever signed it.

First marriage was annulled, I don’t think second one was. But this marriage (if they are married) could possibly be annulled due to coercion.

Harry gets about $300,000/year from his inheritance from Diana, and Charles gives them (PH & PC) $ from the Duchy, but idk how much. After the supposed renovations of Frogmore and her more than million dollar expenditure on clothes in one year, I think they’re being shut down or at least limited. The LAST thing they should do right now, given public opinion, is buy another house. Charles offered them a place (I think in Wales) but they turned it down.

Aquagirl said...

@Nutty: TMZ celebrity tour bus! Love it!

SwishyFishy said...

I saw a report somewhere, that the mainstream media never picked up on, that Doria listed $9,000,000 in income for 2018 on her taxes. She runs yoga classes. That's a lot of stretching people, unless she's laundering Meghan's merching money to keep it out of sight from the RF. Considering Disney gave their "for profit" Foundation $3,000,000, I woudl say they are int eh ballpark for buying a small house in Malibu with those funds alone. Who knows what Meghan has brought in for 2019. Her merching is most likely paying for this house. She can always purchase the home under the name of the Foundation as well, and use any finds in that account. Meghan is one crafty grifter.

Aquagirl said...

Meghan’s bigger concern should be the IRS. She’s had issues with them in the past and I’m sure they’d love to go after her. It’s not just the merching, it’s the ‘gifts’ like the flight that Elton paid for, whatever she was given at the baby shower in NY, free clothes, etc. Plus I think
she still had outstanding tax issues from the Tig. That’s why she closed it down.

I had heard that Doria had a few million in her account, but I didn’t realize it was $9,000,000. How does a yoga teacher not get audited if she declares that much income? I wish that Doria would refuse to give the $ to Meghan. Both grifters. They deserve each other. The house that Doria lives in was actually left to her and a younger brother (I think 1/2 brother?) She stole it right from under him, so she’s definitely capable of screwing over a family member.

Sunkist said...

She's too stupid (too busy climbing) to realize Malibu is not "young" There are just as many old people and it is a hellava lot quieter. At lease with Bel-Air you have West LA/West Hollywood/Bentwood/Santa Monica all there nearby. With Malibu, Santa Monica is close but still a schlep. Anyone with money and good taste would move to Newport Beach or even Manhattan Beach if you insist on LA county

nmnibor said...

Exactly! Finally someone speaks the truth!!

Studio54 said...

The UK is on the brink of riots over Trump clone and right wing puppet Boris Johnson's fascist move to ram through Brexit. These royal grifters buying a house in Malibu will not go down well. They deserve all the blow back they are going to get. It's centuries past time to abolish the Royal scammers anyway.

nmnibor said...
This comment has been removed by the author.
Guesser said...

@Aquagirl,where does the $9 million dollar figure come from? I know Doris seems to live above what would be her means, but she couldn't have gotten that much without setting alarms off tax wise.

Mischi said...

did you all see the clip on twitter where Harry is telling the head of Disney at the Lion King premiere that Meghan is available for voice overs and film parts? search for FawnOverMeGain
@Crystal96867741

tookiesmum said...

@Mischi, after the way she brushed past Iger to get to Beyoncรฉ I doubt he does her any favors. She’s not attractive enough to casting couch either. How much you wanna bet she put Harry up to that?

Rosie riveter said...

She's a princess, you petty & jealous peasant

Aquagirl said...

@Guesser: See SwishyFishy’s post above.

nmnibor said...

She'll be closer to her (rumored) ex-trick Mnuchin's wife, who seems--on so many levels--to be MM's role model.

Mischi said...

tookiesmum, I think you're right. I read on Twitter that Harry said that he had some good contacts in the movie industry and that he could get her parts. She's holding him to that now.

Rosie riveter said...

Lol @ she's skinnier than every female here at CDAN.

#facts

AbbyRock said...

Meghan can hang out with that other teen, Barbra Streisand. :/

Mischi said...

Rosie, she's certainly not slimmer than I.

Lucky13 said...

You're saying she's dashing Harry's dreams of being a fresh prince?

rosalie said...

yes, malibu has gang activity.. yikes the delusion runs deep

Samantha the 1st said...
This comment has been removed by the author.
Samantha the 1st said...

Thought you said *you* are female, Rosie?

Women don't usually use the word "female" in the pejorative sense, and doing it while body shaming is a double-whammy. (It's J that usually is calling MM fat btw, the women here don't.)

Rosie wrote -

"Lol @ she's skinnier than every female here at CDAN.

#facts"

Samantha the 1st said...

Sunkist: traffic to and from Malibu is hellacious. It's meant more for the huge money folks who don't really have to go to and from 'work' outside home very often. The once a year movie types. The CEO types maybe.

Has she ever sat in traffic trying to get into L.A. from the beach?!

Or to and from the airport? I guess if they intend to use a private plane, there's Santa Monica airport. What am I thinking. They are not about to queue up at LAX.

J said...

Listen up, Americans!

She's a princess.

So it's not fatso, it's princess fatso.

Got it?

Samantha the 1st said...

Aquagirl - thanks! Very interesting info. I agree the last thing they need to do now is spend. (When does their tour begin btw?)

I never noticed that he didn't sign it. Wouldn't that be something.

"But this marriage (if they are married) could possibly be annulled due to coercion."

Hmm...! The mind boggles.

I always wondered: Since Henry VIII took all the trouble to demolish abbeys, tear down edifices, execute clergymen, and chop the heads off his wives, all so he could be the head of his own religion -- why didn't he change the one thing that pertained most to his situation? The one thing that prompted it all to begin with?

Why didn't he create such a thing as the no-fault divorce? Nope! He did all that, and still kept all the strict rules regarding marriage and divorce in the newly minted C of E. I vote late stage syphilis warped VIII's brain. That would explain a lot.

Samantha the 1st said...

Murky Meg just gave CDAN a shout-out.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NXfNwpPnwU8

J said...

Yeah, that's one boggled mind.

Tricia13 said...

Speak for yourself,dude

Unknown said...

This is all so stupid. The DM version of this story is based on a story from ONE person. If they were looking for a home here for them to stay when they're visiting that'd be one thing but this is a bit far fetched. (PS--I'm in Santa Monica and many of the Malibu "facts" above are flat out wrong--just sayin'...)

Tricia13 said...

Lol๐Ÿ‘

J said...

๐Ÿ‘™ all day long!

Kay said...

Calling a woman fat -- particularly when she isn't -- is textbook misogyny. It's a gendered double standard employed by weak men (and women) to silence women. Being fat isn't the worst thing a woman can be -- being useless or a failure or someone who sits online all day making disparaging comments about women would be far worse.

Anna Nonymous said...

"Women don't usually use the word "female" in the pejorative sense..." what a load of garbage. So there's a guidebook on how women should speak about themselves? You're sounding like a Real Housewife of Beverly Hills with that - incorrect - observation.

Samantha the 1st said...

^ Words of wisdom from someone literally called "anna nonymous." ^

*eyeroll*

Samantha the 1st said...

"Calling a woman fat -- particularly when she isn't -- is textbook misogyny. It's a gendered double standard employed by weak men (and women) to silence women."

All of this.

J said...

Kay, thanks for weighing in. She's not just a woman, she's a style icon. She edits Vogue magazine and is voluntarily on the covers of magazines. If she wants anonymity, if she wants to avoid my accurate comments on her geometrically-expanding mass, I would be the first to encourage her, to beg her, to live a private life.

Now you'd like to control what I say but I won't let you. Please don't waste your time.

rabbit said...

Meghan gets to skim that $3M from the Disney donation for a house down payment.
And, yes, she's porked up quite a lot. From a size 4 to a size 12/14 and going up, up, up.

Kay said...

@J I'm sure you like to imagine people such as myself truly caring about what you say 24/7 on a gossip site. You aren't that important, trust. And bravo to you for making the distinction between a public vs. private individual. But my assessment stands.

I don't expect you to care or change. You're a misogynist. Period. I've sized you up.



Rosie riveter said...

Ok so... No offense Trisha but...
We've seen many pictures of you,from many angles (thanku for that) and I'm going to stand firm in my original statement lol

Rosie riveter said...

*sigh*

I can see that your brain searches for black and white- and literal words and phrases, Samantha.
And I really do wish you the best here, as you navigate CDAN
But (and I mean this as NICELY as I can say it)
please stop asking me absurd questions

J said...

You care enough to clutch your pearls and comment clucking disapproval, Kay.

Now that you've taken my measure, and I know what your judgment is, you won't have to waste time repeating it to me over and over. I completely acknowledge your moral superiority.

Kay said...

@J No worries. I'll comment how I always do -- whenever I want, however I want -- but thanks for mansplaining the comment system.

It is interesting that you immediately recognized yourself in my comment. Lots of people jumped on the "Meghan is fat" train. But apparently my words found a home at your door.

Wonder why.

Tricia13 said...
This comment has been removed by the author.
J said...
This comment has been removed by the author.
Tricia13 said...
This comment has been removed by the author.
J said...

I can infer well, Kay. Comment as you will, but please don't @ me too much. Derek and another commenter here seem hell-bent on getting comments moderated, and I know a free-thought, free-speech zealot like you wouldn't work toward their goal.

J said...

It's so confusing

Kay said...

@J

Thanks for the compliment.

As you were.

Tricia13 said...

What’s confusing is someone here so long still doesn’t spell my name correctly... it’s not like it’s part of my screenname๐Ÿค”

J said...

Holiday weekend, end-of-Summer sales at the liquor store, you know.

Tricia13 said...
This comment has been removed by the author.
Tricia13 said...

Has only 1 kid*(as opposed to 2 toddlers)

Rosie riveter said...

Would it make you feel better about yourself to post a full length?
To prove to us that Meghan is a big ole fatso?
That's what the point is here... non?

Tricia13 said...

No. I couldn’t give a toss about her... never have. You stayed an incorrect assumption (happens a lot). I fixed it for ya

Tricia13 said...

I never said 1 thing about her weight body -and I don’t and have never use words like fatso or body shamed anyone -~you attempted to So it to female readers here -which-you are “one of” right๐Ÿ™„

J said...

I just remember the post slamming the other royal girl as fugly. Didn't seem very nice to me. I guess people can choose what's allowed and not alliwed when they are boss of everything.

Rosie riveter said...

Please keep going...you're showing your true colors-
Please.....continue...

Tricia13 said...

J what ya mean?

Rosie riveter said...

But don't you applaud when they call her fat?
It's hilarious then isn't it?
So when I point out that J is literally calling 95% of the women here "fat" you literally didn't catch thatz but instead jumped in to say how skinny you are? And that I wouldn't know what it's like because I've never given birth?
Amazing.

Tricia13 said...

No. You verbatim said she is “skinnier”(another word I don’t use ) than any female here. I simply said “speak for yourself”.
Its☝️Right there. I can copy/paste for ya if it helps.

Tricia13 said...
This comment has been removed by the author.
J said...

In the thread about Andrew's daughter's wedding a day or two ago. Until the post is deleted you can read hiw that girl's not pretty enough for our feminist authority. But it'll be deleted quick, that's the MO.

Tricia13 said...



Rosie riveter9:16 AM
Oh this poor girl. I bet everyone calls her "the ugly royal" and it's notta lie.
Yes, I'm looks-shaming.

This one?

J said...

Yeah. So weird... I call one person fat, another poster calls all the wimen here fatter than that person, then says I called everyone here fat, which I never did, not remotely. Very strange.

Tricia13 said...

I think strange sums that person up pretty well...

Guesser said...

I remember when @Rosie riveter was fun. What happened? @Tricia13,I do remember a picture of you and your "taut tummy", it was the day my furnace went out a while back! Meghan has put on a noticeable amount of weight, and looks bigger than when " pregnant ". Not shaming just a fact. Good night,stop fighting,# no moderation.

Astra Worthington said...

My goodness! Gotta love Tricia and J ๐Ÿ‘๐Ÿป๐Ÿ˜†๐Ÿ˜

Good job, y’all!

Astra Worthington said...

Nutty, thanks for posting a new article to your blog! I check it every day, love it!

Astra Worthington said...

Hahahahaha are you effing kidding me!?

Astra Worthington said...

Oh noes J! It’s MUHH SOHHH JUHH NEEEEE!

Anything but that! ๐Ÿ˜ฑ

emeraldcity said...

@tookiesmum.....Harry’s money left both trust funds when he turned 30. Diana’s and The Queen Mothers. Around £20-25million in all , no doubt Megs is handling it all.

@Lulu Filona.....Meghan would have had to sign the Official Secrets Act before she was allowed to marry into the RF. Way more binding than an NDA. She’s still not taken out British Citizenship as far as I can see which I find Verrrry odd.

That would avoid the normal treason charge but they could still ask for extradition on a national security warrant or perhaps arrange for something else if she starts blabbing, leaving the way free for Harry and Archie to return home, no strings attached. Everyone and their dog has to sign the OSA if they work for, or are in constant contact with the RF (even the gardeners), word is even Philip had to sign one , so Megs is not going to get out of it, especially as Harry is probably a blabber mouth.

@Samantha the 1st......yes Harry and William are funded by Charles from his Duchy of Cornwall funds, The Queen pays for the rest of the family. Their funding is purely at Charles discretion so he could cease funding them in a nanosecond, that day is fast approaching if they keep on with their Prima Donna antics. Especially as reports are coming out about them having rejected Charles generous offer of buying them a country estate. Meghan may have fooled them for a short time but she is over playing her hand , much as Diana did and it will all end in tears.

Kay said...

Ok. How about "ass kissing loser", Astra? Is that an improvement?

J said...

Why the hostility, Kay? Please calm down.

Kay said...

Oh shit. Am I becoming hysterical, J?

J said...

You're being very unpleasant. I'll share a secret: there are people in the world who think differently than I do too. I let them, and focus on the clarity and fairness if my own thinking. But you have your system, I have mine.

Kay said...

So you replying to me -- accusing me of being...what? Oh, yeah, a pearl clutching, free-speech limiting, free-thought destroying, disapproval-clucking so-and-so -- was just you, acknowledging that my opinion differs from yours?

That's convenient.

J said...

Describing, Kay, not accusing.

Of course maybe it's all a big misunderstanding and you didn't have me in mind when you chose to judge acceptable and unacceptable rhetoric here. Further, when you characterized persons unknown as "being useless or a failure or someone who sits online all day making disparaging comments about women would be far worse" that wasn't a shrill and unsubstantiated flail in my general direction.

Let me know, because it does seem like there was a bit of intemperate ad hominem there...

Kay said...

Ah, so because you saw yourself in my comment, you thought you'd counter with, in your opinion, an equally shrill and unsubstantiated "description"?

My comment was not directed at you. Did you see the @J? Have I shown a fear of confrontation, J?

Are you often called a misogynist? Does that explain your sensitivity to the word? Do you feel your time on the internet is impeding your real human interactions? Does that explain your sensitivity to my comment?

So many questions. But I know you have the time.



J said...

Oh, a misunderstanding then. You weren't attacking me or judging my comments.

Goodness, how unfortunate. I do have lots of free time, among the many blessings I count. Still, not so much free time that I don't lament the portion wasted today unnecessarily interacting with you, since you didn't have me in mind at all when you came along pronouncing what was and wasn't righteous.

However, always an optimist, I'll celebrate the new clarity and jump out of bed in the morning, eager to spend the day, the week, and hopefully a lifetime not in conversation with you.

Kay said...

So that's a well-practiced, copied and pasted, "yes, I'm often called a misogynist, but my life is so full offline to justify a response" response.

Unlike you, I look forward to reading it again in another 6 months.

Fucking amusing.

J said...

No, just drafted it real time. English Lit degree and a lot of reading.

Anyway, please let's not talk any more. I recommend you chat with Samantha. She started up a fascinating alternative history of the English Reformation up this thread a bit... I'm sure you'd find her a worthy and appropriately-insightful interlocutor. Bye, please.

Kay said...

I don't think I complimented you on your writing ability. I remain unimpressed. Big brains aren't usually found hammering out "how fat is she?" jokes on gossip sites.

Run with the morons, J, and be mistaken for one. No offense to the other morons (and non-morons) commenting here.

Last word? Up to you.

J said...

Stick with Samantha. Be at parity.

Kay said...

Stick with Tricia. Be at parity.

Aquagirl said...

To all, especially Rosie & Kay:

Unless you are blind, it’s clearly evident that Meghan has blown up like a balloon since her so-called pregnancy. There’s no denying it & I don’t feel bad saying it because it’s true. I would never say this about a woman who lives her life privately, but Me-Again, the fame whore, consistently draws attention to herself, so all bets are off.

And to Rosie, who seems to want to compare MM to CDAN readers: I am 5’8” and 125 lbs. So you can add that to your CDAN chart. (Unlike MM who claims to be approximately 5’6” and is really around 5’3” which is especially evident when she’s in her 4’ stilettos, surrounded by taller people such as Kate, William and Harry, I am truly 5’8”.)


Jan 15 said...

Thanks @Nutty, @EmeraldCity, and @Aquagirl for your comments and the laughs too.

My thoughts on the Crown's strategy with dealing with Harry and Meg is the observation that at some point a lot of money is getting drained away from Harry by the couples' own actions. His per annum is pretty low compared to Meg's spending, the vacations, and a house in LA. Perhaps that is the passive tool they will use to handle him. Enty said that they were looking at homes at the $10M mark. So will it be a mortgage or some of Harry's capital? If so, how much capital will get eroded before the inevitable divorce, and how will that change the spousal support? Just thoughts.

not a libtard said...

Sparkles is fatter now than she was at 9 month 'pregnant'. And fyi, I'm 10 years older than her, and weigh 25 pounds less.

Anywho, these two are grifters and con artists. I think they are doing a Clinton Foundation: stealing charity money to finance their lifestyle. I think the Queen is done with them and rightly so. Everyone else is...

What makes me sigh are the Americans. Are you people really hard-up for respectable celebrities that you throw money at James fucking Corden and ex-hooker suitcase girl Sparkles? She's gonna be a star once they're in Hollyweird, mark my words. They'll be the toast of the town. At least in the Uk they got exactly what they deserved, but in th US it'll be all Oprah, Ellen, and whatnot.

Le sigh.

Kay said...

Congrats. You are worthy.

And I bet you'd like to think you'd still be worthy even if you gained 25 pounds.

not a libtard said...

Kay: abso-fucking-lutely. I married for love, I respect my parents, I don't steal, I'm not self absorbed, I don't need to pay people to say nice things about me, and I run my own company, which has employed more or less the same people for 8 years. Even my cleaning lady has been with me for over a decade.

All of this might not be a lot, but it surely is a hell of a lot more than the suitcase girl can say for herself.

The only thing she truly managed to do is hook the retard prince. William wouldn't have looked rather twice.

Unknown said...

I'm 5'11" and 136lbs...not fat! And I'm older than Fartkles.

Ponzi said...

No, Rosie dear, she isn't. She is a duchess.

Jlc1007 said...

๐Ÿ˜‚๐Ÿ˜‚ that was good

Samantha the 1st said...

Well this party picked up overnight! Lol

Ro - I didn't ask you anything. It was rhetorical.

Like "et tu?" was rhetorical, although I guess scholars debate how historical.

The only other thing I recall 'asking' was why you pop in to every Markle blind evn though you claim to hate them, only to insult the people who comment in the Markle blinds. Tht too was rhetorical.

I on't mind i you reply to the 'questions' but it's not obligatory.

Could you have been more patronizing btw? < -- also rhetorical

As for my 'brain searching or literal patterns' or whatever, I'm not literal minded. But your attempted insult seems to describe someone on the spectrum, in which case it's an ableist insult as well. I'm not on the spectrum and your comment makes no sense. There was nothing subtle about your earlier comment.

Then you doubled down on it later, attacking Tricia's appearance in specific. All in reply to a MALE who regularly attacks Meg's weight on CDAN. So yeah, I'm mystified at your intent but not at your meaning.

_________________

Ro typed -

"Ok so... No offense Trisha but...
We've seen many pictures of you,from many angles (thanku for that) and I'm going to stand firm in my original statement lol

6:48 PM
Blogger Rosie riveter said...
*sigh*

I can see that your brain searches for black and white- and literal words and phrases, Samantha.
And I really do wish you the best here, as you navigate CDAN
But (and I mean this as NICELY as I can say it)
please stop asking me absurd questions"



Samantha the 1st said...

"She's not just a woman, she's a style icon"

Meg is NOT a style icon, but since when are you into fashion, J?

"Sparkles is fatter now than she was at 9 month 'pregnant'."

I remarked on her sudden weight gain not long after I got here. It wasn't being talked about at the time. By now everyone's wondering why she remained so thin throughout the 'pregnancy' but then became very puffy with a large stomach after the supposed birth. (That sounds horrible but I don't know how else to phrase it.)

However I wouldn't call her "fat" (and I haven't, it's J who does so on the hour, it seems, with the most unoriginal wording even middle schoolers would find corny), she's average sized now, and the dress at the baby reveal did not do her figure any favors.

It seems like she has been doing yoga to me; her face and limbs seem slimmer than soon after Archie was born. But she still has a bump, and it is very noticeable, imo. I think she is pregnant -- for real this time. I think they used a surrogate the first time.

And as I've said before, for the stans' sakes will say again -- there's nothing wrong in using a surrogate, but, if she wants to truly help others, there are many who can't get pregnant without medical intervention. If Meg would be open about this, she could help destigmatize the issue. Well, maybe not any more. The dislike for her seems to be exponentially growing by the day.

Her father has spoken to the press again. The man is 70 and hasn't met his grandson. That alone is horrible. I think she could pick up a phone or send the man a photo at the very least.

" I recommend you chat with Samantha. She started up a fascinating alternative history of the English Reformation up this thread a bit... I'm sure you'd find her a worthy and appropriately-insightful interlocutor."

I didn't present any theories. I pointed out that his actions made no sense. Some argue that he had syphilis, and others think he was just a jackhole who was cranky because of the giant oozing sore on his leg that wouldn't heal.

But his "reformation" actions while leaving out the main reason for it, made about as much logical sense as his blaming his wives if they had daughters. Maybe he was just not very smart. Or scrupled. Look what his ancestors did to Richard III (and probably to the boys in the tower, too.)




Samantha the 1st said...

Tricia typed -

"I never said 1 thing about her weight body -and I don’t and have never use words like fatso or body shamed anyone -~you attempted to So it to female readers here -which-you are “one of” right"

That's what I don't understand either. A self-proclaimed feminist, and woman, and regular commenter. I could maybe understand if the women here actually did use those words about MM but they don't. It's not something I'd expect a woman or a feminist to do, or to word it the way it was worded, either. And we didn't mistake the meaning, as she later aimed it directly at you.

But when someone consistently stans and gets nastier when it doesn't work, I begin to wonder if they're paid to comment here -- as Rosie said she is, not long ago, btw. That could also explain hanging around while disapproving of the site: watching for blinds on other 'clients.' Astroturfing firms? scrubbing bubbles...scrub, scrub...

Who knows, but it was weird.

Who cares what any of us look like anyway btw. I don't.

This was really interesting, emeraldcity. Thank you for the info and confirmation.

".yes Harry and William are funded by Charles from his Duchy of Cornwall funds, The Queen pays for the rest of the family. Their funding is purely at Charles discretion so he could cease funding them in a nanosecond, that day is fast approaching if they keep on with their Prima Donna antics. Especially as reports are coming out about them having rejected Charles generous offer of buying them a country estate. Meghan may have fooled them for a short time but she is over playing her hand , much as Diana did and it will all end in tears."

Samantha the 1st said...

And, about the blind itself Lol, $10 mil won't buy much in Malibu. A beach shack maybe? A very ordinary, once starter-home in decidedly unfashionable areas of L. A. could easily run $ 1 mil.

But I don't really care tbh. They'll probably never live in it either! What I wonder are things like, where is Archie, why haven't they been out together in a while, and how are they hoping to pull off this tour in the middle of this shambolic mess?

Also did anyone go to visit Diana's grave, on the anniversary? And if so, who?

Samantha the 1st said...

"not a libtard" we don't want either of them...

Corden, or Sparkles. How about Canada??

"What makes me sigh are the Americans. Are you people really hard-up for respectable celebrities that you throw money at James fucking Corden and ex-hooker suitcase girl Sparkles? "

Sorry for the posts-in-a-row guys but I am catching up. Hopefully there will be other people's posts between.

The Sparkles and Southern Charm blinds are my jam. Easy way for those who don't "like" "me" to avoid me btw. But isn't it strange how people hang around topics they claim not to like?!

Turitella said...

I still can't figure out why she put on weight after she supposedly whelped, in spite of the fact that she may or may not be fatter than the females here on this site. It's a mystery indeed.

Samantha the 1st said...

Turitella wins for brevity.

EXACTLY, Turitella, exactly.

rabbit said...

Marble isn't going to be a star in Hollywood. She can't get a magazine cover, or even a mention in a corner of a magazine cover. Nobody cares about her, nobody is willing to spend $ on a magazine to read about her. And she won't be getting voice overs. She can't act. She can't even hold that dummy convincingly.
And, yeah, she's a porker.

Scarlet Peaches said...

That is SO EMBARRASSING. I cringed so hard my ass almost swallowed the chair

YoSoyMilk said...

Yo, for people who claim that they don’t care what people think on here, these spats between some of you are long winded and boring. You don’t need to one up each other all the time

Isabella c said...

Me thinks Rosie is Markle or 1 of her delusional rabid fans and let’s call it like it is she’s freakin huge now considering she was skinny looking when “pregnant” and before the supposed pregnancy I think Dorito is holding the money that Murky stole off the charities and her husband she’s no style icon everything she wears looks like shit on her sponge bob body type
@tricia you’re gorgeous don’t listen to them
@j I think your comments are hilarious and great

Advertisement

Popular Posts from the last 30 days