Subscribe to:
Post Comments
(
Atom
)
Advertisements
Popular Posts from the last 30 days
-
April 10, 2026 What does the A list everything in her mind celebrity have on her actor/director ex that he just willingly gives her $30M tha...
-
A Hollywood model, not super famous but established enough to get steady work, and in 2018 a photographer she knew invited her to a private ...
-
One wonders if this Formula 1 driver realizes his childhood best friend—who was also his personal assistant for seven years—might be in love...
-
In a new episode of the Decisions Decisions podcast, the actress says she turned down a celebrity couple who propositioned her for a threeso...
-
It really hasn't been an issue yet, but it will be this fall. You see, this married couple who have been married for nearly a decade hav...
-
March 10, 2026 The tiny church singer is about to have a very big crashing out. Chappell Roan (and two weeks later....)
-
The former spouse of the permanent A list singer has a significant other but still goes running as soon as the A list actress calls him to c...
-
March 26, 2026 There is an article being written about the A list actor/writer/director/producer and has interviews with dozens of young men...
-
March 31, 2026 There’s no doubt he’s talented, and even the A+ singer has publicly championed him, but the heavy investment behind this A‑ s...
-
March 15, 2026 Speaking of three named actresses, this foreign born one refuses to ever take the weekly shot or get any fat removed from her...




Ummm... Sienna darling?
ReplyDeleteThe 80's called - they want their look back.
Freeeeaky photos....
ReplyDeleteEnt - less Sienna Miller - more Gerard Butler. Preferably shirtless.
ReplyDeleteThenk yew.
Cyn
Ew. I'd imagine these arent the best thing for her career. She looks like a the maimed love child of a mime and Boy George!
ReplyDeleteSienna: "IT'S NOT BEING A CLOWN! IT'S HAUTE COUTURE, DAMMIT"
ReplyDeleteWhat the hell was she thinking!!!
ReplyDeleteEWWWWWWWWWWWWWWW.
Ent, no snark?
ReplyDeleteOn second thought, that would be redundant here, wouldn't it?
fetishist.
ReplyDelete