Blind Item #5
This alliterate actress who is finally beginning to realize how deeply in trouble she is, met with a lawyer in the past week who would only be for her.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments
(
Atom
)
Advertisements
Popular Posts from the last 30 days
-
Speaking of cheating, the wife of this A list singer is always bragging about how much money they have and has a very much let them eat cake...
-
April 14, 2025 The two celebrity/reality star siblings wanted nothing to do with their step sibling at the weekend event. They hate her. Wai...
-
This foreign born former A+ list singer was spotted smoking meth prior to a very recent performance.
-
This married permanent A list actor is an Oscar winner. He also called ICE to deport his housekeeper and her daughter because the daughter, ...
-
The three named actress is about to explode the world of her former co-star.
-
Speaking of things that never change, this permanent A list singer who is known for his solo stuff but travels with a jam band, still prefer...
-
If you think this permanent A list singer has just gone Satanic, you have not been paying attention. Go back in time to before she became fa...
-
March 29, 2025 Prior to getting married, the ginger haired one spent a lot of time sleeping with women associated with or that he came into ...
-
While everyone is talking about who will be the new A++ lister, the disappearance of another A++ lister at the same time suggests they are l...
-
It looks like Coke Mom got a new nose.
Lori Loughlin
ReplyDeleteLoughlin
ReplyDeleteFinally??? Feel like there is a joke with how long it took her to figure this out....
ReplyDeleteProbably could have used that lawyer before she dug that hole six feet deep. At this point she's going to have to sell out some people if she wants a deal.
ReplyDeleteFry, Bitch, fry. And take your snotty kids with you.
ReplyDeleteWhatever punishment she gets will be a fraction of what a regular person would, and a smaller fraction of what would be given to a regular person who happened to be black.
ReplyDeleteThat lady who got 5 years I think for lying about her address to get her kid into a better school district comes to mind.
I am not sure if it is too late. Didn't she and her husband come into court earlier to declare they would be sharing council
ReplyDeleteDifferent laws for different people. However she's been so obnoxious and wouldn't just bow her head and take a slap on the wrist like Huffman that they almost have to make an example of her. Let's be honest, her daughters had to inherit their stupidity from somewhere, turns out it wasn't their father.
ReplyDeleteBest case scenario her husband sells her a$$ down the river to save himself. Most people who never shopped at Target have no idea who he is, but everyone knows Aunt Becky, she'll make a much better trophy for the prosecution.
ReplyDelete@J, you are full of crap. That lady spent 3 days or so in jail and then had some probation for willfully violating state laws. LL is in peril from Federal laws. Her level of crime compared to Huffman is vastly different and will end up with years-long sentencing.
ReplyDelete.robert, if that's true I apologize for carelessly citing something I didn't independently verify. I try to be careful and fully acknowledge it's on me if I post something factually incorrect, which I believe I did this time. Sorry.
ReplyDeleteLet's join together in hoping justice is served and Loughlin gets life behind bars.
Katrina's Voice- your comment made me laugh. So true!
ReplyDeleteWhat a shame they couldn’t just accept their daughters for who they are. The one was making bank being an influencer, or whatever, and now they’ve gone and fucked that all up.
ReplyDeleteWhat a shame they bred.
ReplyDelete@Town Pump - I wish you were correct. But my guess is that this will blow over for the spawn, and they will go back to being paid to be "influencers" and partying.
ReplyDeleteYes, no doubt you’re right. Even as I was typing my comment, I was thinking that I’d heard something about the one kid already being back at it. 🤔
Deleteyes becky...you WILL be held accountable for your actions.
ReplyDeleteis it because another parent g0t 4 months jail time?
ReplyDeleteFelicity Huffman will be out and over the whole thing before Becky even goes on trial. Maybe she'll even have some fresh insights on incarceration she can share with some sympathetic journalist and we'll all love her again. Aunt Becky really f*cked up and missed her chance to add some depth to her persona.
ReplyDeleteDat ass tho.
ReplyDeleteIt's wise for two people involved to have different counsel. You know this Enty. Conflicts of interest, what may be good for one is not good for the other, etc.
ReplyDeleteMartha Stewart must be shitting her adult diapers right now
ReplyDeleteHeard she's so into yoga, she is able to keep her head stuck up her own a$$ for months.
ReplyDelete@Studio54, those two people claimed they did nothing wrong and pled not guilty. Wouldn't a married couple having different representation in that circumstance look weird to the jury?
ReplyDelete
ReplyDeleteThis case isn't about 'college admissions'. That was the front.
Rich people have been sneaking their kids into top colleges in America for 300 years.
How did they own a 38M estate situated in Malibu, plus an 8M spread in Aspen, plus all the luxuries that go along with that lifestyle? Does anyone believe that selling clever Tshirts at Target, and doing cozy little movies for the Hallmark channel, buys that opulent lifestyle? Bollocks.
https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/tanya-mcdowell-felicity-huffman/
ReplyDelete@Unknown, NOW I see where the confusion lies. Different sources have different cases they are referring to:
ReplyDelete"In Ohio, Kelley Williams-Bolar was charged for lying about her residency to get her child into a better school and ordered to pay restitution of $30,000," she said. "When she didn’t pay it she was sent to jail for 15 days."
Also, SNOPES can kiss my ass. They should have pointed this out and chose not to. They always leave important things out that do not support their agenda.
This comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDelete