Saturday, September 14, 2019

Blind Items Revealed #2

September 3, 2019

The two main accusers in a recent documentary are trying to get a bill passed in CA which would allow them to sue for treble damages against the accused, who is a permanent A++ lister.

Wade Robson and James Safechuck/Michael Jackson

31 comments:

Dumblesnore said...

Good for them.

Do Tell said...

Wade Robson should be blocked from ever collecting anything from that estate. I believe there are victims of M and I don't believe Wade is one of them. After he ruined a previous case with his testimony, and then recently turned around on Michael Jackson so he could try to make some bucks, i hope he never gets anything.

Sd Auntie said...

of course they are. wade thought he would be in the will.

Count Jerkula said...

Tree, they cant sue for bass?

rosemary booker said...

“Oh but he ruined his case he already testified in favor of Michael!!!!”

Yes, he was also a child at the time and didn’t comprehend the toxic and manipulative relationship that was built between them. Next.

Gollum's Wing Man said...

MJ wasn't a ped. He liked to sleep in bed with little boys. That's no big deal, right? haha

Bleu said...

What bill is Enty referring to? The False Claims Act allows for triple damages -- but that is about theft of money from the government. It's not in any way about the kind of "whistle blower" these people might be.

MissDavie said...

Unpopular opinion but you do have to wonder why there are not many more victims surfacing. Didn't Jackson host elaborate sleepovers? Aren't there allegations of dozens if not hundreds of children staying at Neverland?
Why have none of the "big names" who would be Pedo Gold to a pedophile (Feldman and Culkin) said over and over than nothing happened to them when it would be beneficial now to say they were indeed molested?
Why is it just these same few boys? There's no longer any shame attached. Any bullying by some kind of Michael Mafia could be immediately reported and quashed. There's nothing but pure profit for the victims, so why aren't there more victims?
IDK maybe out of the many, many children who MJ associated with, maybe he just picked a few to molest. It's just odd all the way around.

Freckles said...

I hope the family of the boy with cancer joins in. Wasn't wade a kid when he testified?

Amy said...

If any other (non-celebrity) middle aged man chose to sleep in a bed with young boys (never young girls...) then they'd be lynched.
No way is it 'normal.'

Studio54 said...

Kudos to Wade and James! The climate of fear and retribution was high during Jacko's life, from Jacko and his cult. I'm so glad they are standing up for the truth, about this obvious pedo, Jacko.

Studio54 said...

@Freckles: Yes, Gavin is that boy, I hope he joins in.

StacG said...

It definitely wasn’t normal to host kids occasionally at the ranch and have sleepovers. Michael didn’t have a childhood, so perhaps it allowed him to obtain a sense of a childhood. I don’t believe the alleged victims. I believe this is ultimately a money grab. M. Caulking was around, along with other kids and they all said nothing happened. It did come out after the fact that some parents had coached their kids in saying he touched them so that they can get money.

leo21 said...

They can sue all they want. They still have credibility issues that a jury won't overlook. I am inclined to believe them now but they deserve to pay a cost for lying before.

designace001 said...

I'm with MissDavie. Michael is being used as One Big Huge distraction in one of the biggest they went that away's ever seen. What cinched the deal for me was Oprah's overblown promotional finger pointing in between her DG boat rides. That, and the fact she and the rest of her finger pointing posse's absolute silence on Epstein, Harvey and all the rest of her 'close' pedo friends. #metoo is a sham and it's only safe to talk about the boys if the perp is dead pretty much sums it up.

MissDavie said...

Oprah teaming with Geffen to produce some kind of expose' about Neverland certainly set off my Bullshit Meter. It's a distraction from the really big, really perverted Pedo fish...Mr. Geffen himself.

Guesser said...

Wade was a child during the Jordy Chandler case. He testified for Jackson in that case and in the criminal case with Gavin. He is one of the reasons Michael was found not guilty. What became of Gavin? Whether Michael is guilty or not, that kid is a victim. And yes,if Geffen and Oprah weren't giving their endorsements,I would be more inclined to believe them.

Unknown said...

MissDavies....that isn't an unpopular opinion..it is an absolutely ridiculous one. I mean, you must be some cold hearted idiot. Do you ever wonder why rapists only rape one person instead of all of them? Why do murders only kill one person instead of everyone? Using this as some twisted logic for the people that MJ did molest is just bizarre. Maybe, just maybe, other kids knew they would come under the terrible scrutiny that these two people have experienced. Have you watched the documentary? Even if you don't believe that MJ actually fucked these young boys, there is another other behavior that is laid out in there by other people to show that something was pretty fucking wrong with him.

Now I guess the best application to your genius theory....is to wonder...do you disbelieve only these kids, or do you disbelieve all survivors of sexual crimes?

MissDavie said...

Go Fuck Yourself Unknown. I said in my post that it could very well be MJ only chose certain kids out of the many who stayed there. I acknowledged that possibility. Now re-read my post and go fuck yourself again.

MissDavie said...

I think we also have to acknowledge that for many years MJ was a zombie drug addict. There is no telling what happened in that house. Could be nothing could be literally anything.

Unknown said...

MissDavie, thanks and go royally fuck yourself. No matter what else you said, you also questioned the truth in these reports because he only seemed to have abused these two boys when he could have abused others...your opinion is so out of touch you should get a pair of senior diapers to go with it. No matter what else you said, you also included that awful thing. Tacky and shameful, even if you are a Miss.

Do Tell said...

"Yes, he was also a child at the time and didn’t comprehend the toxic and manipulative relationship that was built between them. Next."

@rosemary: Yes, Grifter Wade was an innocent child of TWENTY TWO when he AGAIN got on the stand in 2005 AS AN ADULT and AGAIN said there was nothing sexual about his relationship with Michael Jackson.

I'd say at the age of 22, he knew exactly what kind of relationship he did or did not have with an adult man back in the day. He said in court, twice, that it was nothing untoward, helped ruin two other cases in the process, kids I'm sure you don't give a shit about, and now is turning around and saying the opposite because WADE NEEDS MONEY.

I am sorry for the other kid(s) who did take Michael Jackson to court and could not prevail because of Wade, and I feel sorry for Safechuck that Wade has now latched onto him, hoping to cash in. NEXT.

Scarlet Peaches said...

+1

Nicole said...

I am an insider. MJ had a fucked up upbringing and chose children to hang out with. He had no trust for adults. Yep, he slept with children in his bed. That's it. There was no sex. Period. MJ was asexual. Literally "sleeping" with children gave him comfort and a sense of peace he never knew. That is it. The rest of the story is pure bullshit. Any other agenda is about $$ and taking the attention off the real pedos. Geffen and the other A++ list mafia used their money and power to put all the attention on MJ so they could continue their very fucked up lifestyles. Miss Davie, you are absolutely correct with what you state.

Nicole said...

...and I am not endorsing MJ's sleeping with children. Just stating the facts. That is all he did. No sex, no bj's, just SLEEPING w the boys. I saw the documentary. Again, not saying sleeping with the boys was an ok thing to do.
The camera's were part of MJ's desire for privacy. He had no privacy, so when you went into the private lair, it was just to be fucking left alone.
These boys that shared his bed had their own family shit. The parents that allowed it need to own it. The boy's parents thought: "Wow, we get to go to Neverland. Jets, A+ list lifestyle, we get $, my kid gets to hang out at Neverland, we are oh, so close to celebrity royalty and we don't have to think about the fact we are shit parents. And people will think we are amazing parents!! WIN!!"
Again, not endorsing bad behavior.
Just stating the facts.

Count Jerkula said...

No sex or bjs? So handjobs and groping were going on?

If there was a god, MJ and his entire scummy family would have died from a carbon monoxide leak, or space heater explosion after they filled it with gas instead of kerosene.

Unknown said...

@Nicole, explain to me why there was a locked private bedroom in the back of MJ's closet?That room contained pornographic material? He has all kinds of pornographic material of both young boys and adult? He's asexual? Right? Also why is that sheriff's video of the officer's finding that room and entering it wiped from YT? Yeah he was asexual alright. I don't care if you are an insider, he was still a pedophile. You don't sleep with children as a grown man and it bring you comfort? I don't believe that for one minute.

Mary Lamb said...

Is it wrong to ask which demographic finds Michael Jackson innocent of child molestation?
I see it's fine to accuse his accusers of LYING for a piece of the sexual molester's estate.
Many people protected MJ. They deserve to pay too. I hope to live to see that happen, along with vindication for all of his victims.

Guesser said...

@Mary Lamb,I think part of the reason for some of us to question his guilt is that we knew of him as a child. Logically,it appears he is guilty, but it still is difficult to wrap one's head around it and see it continue. You last comment is what is going to let us know the truth,once and for all. Michael is dead,but many others know the truth aren't. Some of them are still protecting others. And if Wade and Safechuck are telling the truth, they need to know their Mothers sold them out as well.

orangesoda said...

Yep, these kids could describe the distinguishing marks on his peen but he wasn't a molester, riiiiight. Some of you are completely deluded. 'Oh but he had a bad childhood' so did a lot of us but we don't sleep in bed with little kids. What a joke of an argument.

Mary Lamb said...

@Guesser, of course their parents sold them out and they know it too. That's a huge measure of their pain.
To come to the realization that the man who they admired to 'god-like' status and their parents, the most influential people in their lives, betrayed them is more than anyone can handle.
Those who defend Michael saw him as an icon who they adored as children, no doubt about it.
As adults, common sense has to tell them that they too were deceived. His talent is as undeniable as his sexual abuse of children.
Survivors of sexual abuse behave differently, there's no standard of behavior or when they come to terms with the abuse. They were groomed. They were lavished with gifts, trips, attention and so-called 'love'. It's very individual.
It saddens me when people take such a black and white stand, ironically, as to how a survivor would or should behave.
Btw, my first 45 was "I'll Be There", given to me by my first boyfriend on Christmas day when I was nine.
A '45' is a little vinyl record, lol.

Advertisement

Popular Posts from the last 30 days