Tuesday, March 20, 2018

Blind Item #3

This permanent A+ list director is looking to cast children in an upcoming huge movie even though there have never been any children in any version of the basis for that movie at any time. 


1 – 200 of 316   Newer›   Newest»
Tricia13 said...


Tricia13 said...
This comment has been removed by the author.
Roger Moore said...

West. Side. Story.

Anonymous said...

Walnut Sauce Story

Tricia13 said...

Roger Moore got the film as West Side Story..(apparently Naua Rivera auditioned)... please god do not let another classic be tainted and destroyed:(((


I'm bringing my SPIELBERG IS A PEDOPHILE sandwich board when they start location shooting here, if he's not in prison by then.
Does Crispin Glover post here? He should.

totaji said...

This blind says a lot. One of the most telling blinds, without saying a thing. ๐Ÿ˜ณ

joshg g said...

We should start a social media campaign to get Gabe Hoffman on Joe Rogan's podcast. He has at least a million downloads per episode.



How about the new scene where Riff and Bernardo get drenched by an exploding sewage main?

Unknown said...

There was a kid in the Temple of Doom.

For the West Side Story movie? Based on Romeo and Juliet. The kid will be a young, blonde, Shiksa with accomodating parents. She'll play the younger, racist sister of Tony. Dead against him banging a beaner on the side she comes to a sticky end.

Anyway called on the last blind. I'm awesome.

Brayson87 said...

+1 Tricia and Roger Moore

@Vessimede, there was an army of children in Temple of Doom, disturbing.

My friend always wondered why the Academy hated Spielberg, maybe they knew all along.

The Woodman said...

The Speilberg stuff is just stunning to me. Can any one of you nice folks direct me to a blind or blinds that elaborates on this theory?


What Is It?
(An essay concerning the subtext of the film by the same title)
by Crispin Hellion Glover

Is this culture content? Is it happy? Are the smiles broadcast by this culture’s media the smiles that reflect the collective mind? Does the self-professed compassion of the media for the unfortunate seem sincere?

Is this culture a Judeo-Christian culture? Is forgiveness a quality of Christian ethos? Didn’t Eric Harris and Dylan Klebold of Columbine high school pose with a caption that stated, “Stay alive, stay different, stay crazy”? Didn’t they target Christians? Weren’t they accused of being “Nazis”? Wasn’t one of them Jewish? Wasn’t one of them an honor student? If these fellows were staying “crazy” and staying “different,” and thinking on their own, were they perhaps manifesting a counter-cultural ideal?

What else in this culture were the Columbine killers attacking? Aren’t “jocks,” whom they killed, generally considered common “good guys” by our culture? Don’t jocks represent pro-cultural values? Do those who hold values that counter the culture see jocks as boorish, vapid, brute, conceited and condescending, who willfully insult and violate those who refuse to gang with the masses?

Were Harris and Klebold reacting to the media itself? Did they give their own lives and take others to make a point about the media at large? Can it be true that the media-at-large is so neurotic that it is unable to truthfully describe the Columbine event? Is it true that a videotape they produced just before the killings is now being withheld so the public can not determine their own thoughts about Harris’ and Klebold’s statements?

In Civilization and Its Discontents, did Sigmund Freud define a neurotic as an individual holding thoughts that clash with those held by the prevailing culture, an individual who subverts those clashing thoughts to the subconscious that later manifest in the form of anxiety and unnecessary behavior? If this is so, what does one consider a culture whose prevailing ideas express hypocrisy, sham and double-standard? Does this somehow define a neurotic culture?

HippieChick said...

Sounds kinda like Scarface


Does Steven Spielberg hold the same values I wish upon myself? Does the mind of this grinning, bespectacled, baseball-capped man entirely reflect this culture?

Is it true that in his waning years, Orson Welles asked Steven Spielberg for a small amount of money with which he could make a final film? Is it true Steven Spielberg refused? Is it true that Steven Spielberg bought a sled used in Citizen Kane for an extremely large sum of money?

Do Steven Spielberg’s passions burn? Do passions burn in the man now imprisoned who wished to anally rape Steven Spielberg? Do our cultural mouthpieces confidently inform us that the wish to anally rape Steven Spielberg is a bad thought? Could anal rape of Steven Spielberg be simply the manifestation of a cultural mandate?

Do you believe Steven Spielberg is an ideal guide and influence for our culture? Do Steven Spielberg’s films question our culture? What do Steven Spielberg’s films question? Does Steven Spielberg focus much of his fantasy life on young people? Did he portray children wallowing in sewers filled with fecal matter in Schindler’s List? Did he use children to finger paint an adult in Hook? Does he collect the illustrations of Norman Rockwell, such as the one showing a young boy in his underwear examined by a doctor? Are the inclinations of Steven Spielberg above suspicion by the media-fed culture? Was Steven Spielberg very friendly with Michael Jackson? Wasn’t Michael Jackson supposed to play Peter Pan in Steven Spielberg’s version of the story? Now that Michael Jackson is no longer held in favor by the mass media, does Spielberg associate with him? Do Michael Jackson and Steven Spielberg share similar opinions about the sexuality of young boys?

Did Joseph Goebbels popularize certain ideals to the mass culture? Does Steven Spielberg attempt to do the same thing? Is celebrity more special than actual truth in art?

When you join in a conversation with strangers, do you openly discuss any idea whatsoever without fear of conflict? Or do you restrain yourself from discussing certain things for fear of offending people and then becoming an outcast? Are there laws that deem certain forms of thought as bad and wrong? Is what is now termed “hate” a form of thought?


Does our culture consider it acceptable to have a minstrel represent a black person on film? Does our culture consider it acceptable to have a person of average intelligence represent a retarded person on film? Why is one thing questionable, and one thing acceptable? Did Adolf Hitler entertain any good thoughts? Was Shirley Temple sexy as a young girl?

What if you wish to express these ideas? Can people sue you for expressing ideas, particularly if they’re blamed for inspiring behavior considered antithetical to cultural norms?

Would the cultural mainstream ever silence or suppress Steven Spielberg? Has the United States government given the immensely wealthy Steven Spielberg millions of dollars to fund a media project that reflects his religious heritage, and his cultural beliefs? Does The Talmud speak of the superiority of the Jews and the inferiority of other cultures and beliefs? Does Steven Spielberg reflect this religious imperative? Is Steve Spielberg neurotic? Is this belief hidden and suppressed?

If one discovers that everything one has been taught to be good is actually false, what then? At what point is one neurotic?

Did Vincent Van Gogh, Diane Arbus and Rainer Werner Fassbinder die for the sins of their culture? Did Joseph Goebbels?

Are we fed massive cultural propaganda? Are we infused with the belief that we act as we wish and do what we want? Are we not simply believing what cultural propaganda suggests us to think?

Do you like MTV? Do you like Steven Spielberg? Do you like post-punk rock? Do you like trip hop? Do you like rap? Do you define yourself according to the music you listen to? Do you consider yourself a true lover of music because you are in a rock band, or because your boyfriend is in a rock band? Do you like tattoos? Do you like body piercing? Do you believe that love, kindness, compassion, recycling and equality will save this culture from all its woes? Do you? Do you?

parissucksliterally said...

I can't believe Spielberg is a pedophile. My mind will not go there.
I pray you are all wrong. If he really is, I will seriously be so devastated.



Is it considered “career suicide” to question Steven Spielberg if one is involved in the entertainment business? If one is not involved in the entertainment business is it considered a social suicide to question Steven Spielberg? If these things are so, what does that point to? Does this mean freedom of expression is actually curtailed in our culture by certain social pressures? Is calling someone a “fascist” in American culture today the counterpart to saying someone was a “communist” during the Joseph McCarthy era of the 1950s?

Does our culture congratulate itself for taking interest in the lack of original ideas personified by the name of Steven Spielberg? Do his films take chances or take risks in order to amplify, change or challenge the cultural though process? Does Steven Spielberg take risks, or does he simulate the idea of taking risks? What risk was involved in making Saving Private Ryan or Schindler’s List, or adopting a black child? Was there any risk at all? Would Steven Spielberg have adopted that same child in the Deep South of the 1950s where there would have been risk of being called a “nigger lover”? Were the adoption of a black child and the subject matter of his movies actually business decisions for which he knew he would be congratulated?

When Steven Spielberg clutched his Academy Award for Schindler’s List, saying it’s for the “six million,” was he speaking of a quantity of people killed, or the quantity of dollars poured into his bank account?

Did Steven Spielberg truly help the culture understand Stanley Kubrick’s ideas at an Academy Awards eulogy? Or did he accuse Kubrick’s films of being “hopeful” to make them seem as if they sell the same ideas as Steven Spielberg’s movies? Was A Clockwork Orange about hope? Was Barry Lyndon about hope? Was Dr. Strangelove about hope? Was Lolita about hope? Was Full Metal Jacket about hope? Was The Killing about hope?

Was Steven Spielberg’s company sued by an African-American woman who claimed that Amistad was based on her writing? Was this African-American woman suddenly happy with Steven Spielberg after he deposited a lot of money into her bank account?


Did Steven Spielberg truly help the culture understand Stanley Kubrick’s ideas at an Academy Awards eulogy? Or did he accuse Kubrick’s films of being “hopeful” to make them seem as if they sell the same ideas as Steven Spielberg’s movies? Was A Clockwork Orange about hope? Was Barry Lyndon about hope? Was Dr. Strangelove about hope? Was Lolita about hope? Was Full Metal Jacket about hope? Was The Killing about hope?

Was Steven Spielberg’s company sued by an African-American woman who claimed that Amistad was based on her writing? Was this African-American woman suddenly happy with Steven Spielberg after he deposited a lot of money into her bank account?

Does the amount of money taken in by people determine happiness in this culture? Is the earth an unlimited resource, or is there a definitive quantity for people to exploit for gross amounts of money? When a capitalist invokes the word “hope,” does he speak about the continued escalation of his earning power, without being stopped? Could this hope be an illusion?

Are the ice sheets of the Arctic and Antarctic melting and shearing off? Could negative population growth possibly help solve this problem? Isn’t one child per two people negative population growth? Would Steven Spielberg ever support the idea of negative population growth within the medium? Have the goals of Freemasonry, as encapsulated by the back half of the dollar bill, succeeded? Has a megastate of greed been created?

Did DreamWorks, the megacorporate entity co-owned by Steven Spielberg, consider paving over the last remaining wetland in Southern California to create a studio? Does Steven Spielberg feel comfortable emasculating the natural? Is climbing the Alps, or is riding the Matterhorn rollercoaster in Disneyland, more attractive to Steven Spielberg? Is the theme park mentality of our culture, which is made to feel “right” and “moral” by the propagandizing movies of Steven Spielberg, helping to destroy individual thought processes and emasculate what remains of the earth?

Is it possible that the Columbine shootings would have not occurred if Steven Spielberg had never wafted his putrid stench upon our culture, a culture he helped homogenize and propagandize?

Unknown said...

Look up the sad life of Heather O'Rourke. It's now accepted that Spielberg was the actual director of Poltergeist, he wasn't credited because of some stupid union rule. That motherfucker should be slowly pig roaster over an open fire for what happened to that poor kid alone. His new movie is supposed to be pretty good, don't care, will NEVER watch a damn thing from that monster.


Would the culture benefit from Steven Spielberg’s murder, or would it be lessened by making him a martyr? Or would people then begin to realize their lives had become less banal and more interesting due to his departure?

Because I think it is possible a beautiful piece of non-lingual music could well be written by an angry victim once Steven Spielberg becomes a corpse. It could be that this angry victim of banal and ruinous propaganda will have written an anthem signaling a new era, a new thought process, a new music, and a new culture that is desperately needed in the coming days, and forevermore.

The one question lingering before this new utopian culture may very well be:


parissucksliterally said...

Geeljire, what the fuck was that rant?

I am just waking and having coffee, I cannot even begin to process that yet.


Crispin Glover telling the truth when no one wanted to hear it.

Tricia13 said...

Right on dude...
Good point about Crispin... rumour has it be read the site for a while and did post under some strange name.

Unknown said...

Yeah that was the infamous stream of consciousness rant from Glover. Dude was high as fuck most of the time, doesn't mean he wasn't telling the truth though.

T. W. said...

Spielberg for sure. Drew ain't gonna talk.

Charlie Sheen please tell us what you know.

s.s. said...

It's an essay by Crispin Glover, which Geeljire should have posted a link to, and maybe key quotes from, but instead spams the board with the entire thing.

Mods please delete...

aanjheni said...

@Parissucksliterally - I believe it is an 'essay' that Crispin Glover wrote a while back. This should give you more information: https://squawker.org/culture-wars/a-2003-essay-by-actor-crispin-glover-suggests-steven-spielberg-appreciated-the-sexuality-of-young-boys/

totaji said...

Most of the major children he discovered were all molested and many have broken lives. Even if he didn’t do it himself, he had to have known about it and should be accountable to some degree.

femisapien said...

This is the one person who, if really a pedo, if ever uncovered, can lead to total collapse of the industry...
Maybe it is what is needed.
The signs are all there: Himmmm gave hints, some obvious blinds, the fact that almost all children who worked with the man and lived are troubled adults...

Maybe Enty can talk to some old Academy members who, maybe, will vent about why took so long for him to get a best director oscar...

totaji said...

Nice try! We’re on to you!!!

filmfanb said...

Spielberg will go to his deathbed without it getting out.
Part of the untouchable clan with Geffan

The Woodman said...

Thanks to all.

Unknown said...

Crispin should definitely be put onto this website if he hasn't been already. I would love to read more about his time in Hollywood and working with Spielberg.


'The Ones Who Walk Away from Omelas'

CJ said...

That Crispin Glover essay didn't make much sense to me when I first read it, but it does now.

I do wish Geeljire had made it more clear that he was quoting Glover.

Rosie riveter said...


Now THIS, I can get into

Brayson87 said...

The era of the untouchable ones is ending, more people need to speak out. The mainstream outlets aren't the gatekeepers they once were, word is getting out.

filmfanb said...

I want to agree Brayson but I really think him and Geffan will get away with it all. Same with Podesta etc....

totaji said...

Yeah, we can only hope one day Podesta will pay for mentioning pizza in an email several years ago.

Unknown said...

Thank you sir

Nubian princess said...

Wow. Mind officially blown.

Brayson87 said...

Yeah after certain blinds I'm sure he was just in that Arizona desert to get away from his cell phone.


Unknown said...

They'll get away with it until they're stopped. On that day (if it comes), it will suddenly seem obvious, and people will ask all the same questions they asked about the priest molestation scandal: How did we not know? Why didn't any parents or victims speak out? How could so many people have been either fooled or complicit?

The interesting thing about this blind is that it suggests the predator is continuing with business as usual, doing his hunting right out in plain sight through the casting process. That suggests either that he thinks he's untouchable, or that he just can't help himself. Maybe both.

Unknown said...

Hey, @ Totaji, it's not that Podesta mentioned "pizza" in an email. That's misrepresenting the whole damn issue.

It was that he associated with a guy who ran a pizza shop and an instagram that featured sexualized children, money, drugs. His employees posted sexual images featuring pizza (as in people having sex on top of, or gay porn with a slice of pizza covering the peen, or a man laying in shadows, pizza slice atop his junk and a bottle of honey next to him).

Whenever the pizza joint owner was interviewed as an "oh, pity me" he never ONCE mentioned the images on his instagram which made people see red and start looking at all his various connections.

I mean, all awesome pizza joints have all ages shows featuring bands called Sex Stains and Heavy Breathing, and joking about changing their name to "Long Dong Pizza" right? Right?


Sara, Making It Work said...

Holy shitballs.
Look, I consider myself a Crispin Glover fan. I had a poster of him in my locker, no joke. I was a contributor to his unofficial fanzine "Mr Density" back in the 90s. I have his CD and an autographed book. I thought I knew all there was to know about the man.
I have actually SEEN the movie "What Is It", and could not make heads or tails of the thing, but he was very, very proud of it at the screening.
I certainly didn't see any of that rant as the subtext. I just remember it as incredibly unsettling, and left the screening wondering if he was off his rocker. It was 20 years ago though, and well before the essay was published. And sadly, I never even heard about this essay before the CDAN comment section. Amazing how shit gets buried. Kudos to Crispin for speaking out, even if it was silenced.

I guess the movie would be worth watching again (and the rest in the series) with this background.

Thank you @Geeljire for posting it
Thank you @aanjheni for the link

Carry on....

Unknown said...

I have never once seen Podesta offer a single explanation for ANY of the f*cked up stuff in his emails. From kids being ubered in to his party to entertain him in the pool to invitations to "spirit cooking" dinner with Marina Abramovic at his brother Tony's house. F*ck John Podesta and everyone close to him. They are all sick and disgusting people.

Brayson87 said...

@Unknown, the media and certain political groups have a strict Don't Ask About Kids Don't Tell policy.

EllaMinnow said...

@mandi rei serra, thanks for all you do to raise awareness for this hellish issue of which you speak, on v/pg, here, and other forums.
It's a reality that monsters live among us and prey upon our children.
However monsters are scary and many people would rather close their eyes and minds to the truth, even to the point of belittling the believers.
But that doesn't make monsters go away. It just makes it easier for them to hide.
Thank you for helping to get rid of the hiding spots. And the monsters.

IanPhlegming said...

It's beginning to feel like there is a kind of global consciousness of understanding about Spielberg that is bubbling towards a broad public understanding. Time is catching up with him. Most of his recent movies have not done well. "The Post" was snubbed universally across awards season.

The people who control the media are trying to make "Ready Player One" some kind of event movie, because VR isn't being embraced by the public (it makes me sick and gives me a headache, for example) and they need some sort of cultural burst of positivity.

If you go through Spielberg's career, he's been making and producing films with kids for decades and decades, and many of those kids ended up seriously damaged and/or dead. The fact they're adding kids to WSS is sickening. I will boycott that film as I have boycotted all his films (and have convinced others to do so).

Anybody who thinks Drew Barrymore is going to come forward with any "Truth" is kidding themselves. She's in so deep, from multi-generational affiliations and compromises, that she can't escape.

One want to push back against these dark forces is guerrilla communications warfare. Write "Spielberg is a child rapist" on dollar bills with "Google Heather O'Rourke," and stuff like that.

This 1990s essay of film criticism about Spielberg's films and their unusual interest int he sexuality of boys has been wiped from Google search, but it still exists online. Everyone should read it, particularly since Google doesn't want anybody reading it.


Maude Lebowski said...

"Mods please delete"

Dude. You obviously have no idea how things work here

AshBey said...

Can't stop thinking of Bale on "Empire of the Sun" and how he said SS made his life hell. No wonder dude was rumored to have $hit rags in his mouth.

Jayne Townsley said...

Things don't get deleted here.

Like it or not, free thinking is allowed at CDaN even if certain posters hate what you think.

Thinkthinkthink said...

SS is a pedophile. Where the hell are the times up for that horror?

nonyabusiness said...

as much as i would like to see him brought down, i just don't believe it will ever happen, at least not while he's still alive. he's much richer and much, much more powerful than weinstein ever was/ever will be.


ุจِุณْู…ِ ุงู„ู„ู‡ِ ุงู„ุฑَّุญْู…ู†ِ ุงู„ุฑَّุญِูŠู…ِ

ุฃَุฑَุฃَูŠْุชَ ุงู„َّุฐِูŠ ูŠُูƒَุฐِّุจُ ุจِุงู„ุฏِّูŠู†ِ

ูَุฐَٰู„ِูƒَ ุงู„َّุฐِูŠ ูŠَุฏُุนُّ ุงู„ْูŠَุชِูŠู…َ

ูˆَู„َุง ูŠَุญُุถُّ ุนَู„َู‰ٰ ุทَุนَุงู…ِ ุงู„ْู…ِุณْูƒِูŠู†ِ

ูَูˆَูŠْู„ٌ ู„ِّู„ْู…ُุตَู„ِّูŠู†َ

ุงู„َّุฐِูŠู†َ ู‡ُู…ْ ุนَู† ุตَู„َุงุชِู‡ِู…ْ ุณَุงู‡ُูˆู†َ

ุงู„َّุฐِูŠู†َ ู‡ُู…ْ ูŠُุฑَุงุกُูˆู†َ

ูˆَูŠَู…ْู†َุนُูˆู†َ ุงู„ْู…َุงุนُูˆู†َ

Samantha Willow said...

@Geel: I have time to assist in your sign waving. You should get a group together!

jessorella said...

Ugh. My son is so excited to see Ready Player One. I would be too if it weren’t for CDAN. I know that’s a good thing in the long run, but it doesn’t feel like it :( Did anyone else see the photo of the lost boys from Hook, then and now? I was surprised to see it.

T. W. said...

@geeljire - I can't read. :' (

NachoCheese said...

I'm all for free thinking, speech, etc, but, I don't want to listen to everything. A blocking feature would be nice. Thank you. :D


In the name of God, the Gracious, the Merciful.

1. Have you considered him who denies the religion?

2. It is he who mistreats the orphan.

3. And does not encourage the feeding of the poor.

4. So woe to those who pray.

5. Those who are heedless of their prayers.

6. Those who put on the appearance.

7. And withhold the assistance.

Anonymous said...

If you want to stare into your own belly button you came to the wrong place snowflake

hothotheat said...

s.s. thinks s/he's on Reddit.

Schneiderisnext said...

The church/all male rehab in AZ?


Schneiderisnext said...

What is it?

IT'S Hidden INSTITUTIONALIZED PEDOPHILIA, abuse, RAPE, and depravity behind a sugar-coated veneer of Family Values.

But he couldn't say it outright. So he had to make a visual metaphor.

Kel said...


BluePedal said...

Is it wrong of me to hope that Geeljire accidentally slams his car door on both of his hands? He'd probably figure out how to type with his toes or his nose if he did.

Dear god man you have diarrhea of the fingers.

Mary Lamb said...

Was it your difficulty in scrolling or comprehension that jammed your ass up?

Mary Lamb said...

To answer your question, yes.

Mary Lamb said...

+1 As soon as I read that about Diddy, I thought the same.

plot said...

"Yeah, we can only hope one day Podesta will pay for mentioning pizza in an email several years ago"

And Risotto! And pizza toppings! Don't you get it????

@Mandi Rei Serra

You neglected to mention the basement torture chamber that 4chan drooled over, in a way that explained their fantasies, no one else's.

Oh you poor fools.

Glover's rant, which I've read several times, is unhinged. Whatever his point, listing it in the form of 10,000 questions ain't coherent.

If he has something to say, better take off the wig and quit kicking at fantasies.


You showed up as predicted and now I'm ready to take this shit to major league, 100+ comments!

Saw this earlier and thought you may personally enjoy it, @plot:

plot said...

Oh well, as long as we're allowed to copy/paste long formats here -

Some of the GOP/ministers/Republican operatives CONVICTED of child rape,abuse and pornography (yet are ignored in favor of pizza toppings among the trolls and 4chan.)

Drum roll-

Republican anti-abortion activist Howard Scott Heldreth is a convicted child rapist in Florida.

Republican County Commissioner David Swartz pleaded guilty to molesting two girls under the age of 11 and was sentenced to 8 years in prison.

Republican judge Mark Pazuhanich pleaded no contest to fondling a 10-year old girl and was sentenced to 10 years probation.

Republican anti-abortion activist Nicholas Morency pleaded guilty to possessing child pornography on his computer and offering a bounty to anybody who murders an abortion doctor.

Republican legislator Edison Misla Aldarondo was sentenced to 10 years in prison for raping his daughter between the ages of 9 and 17.

Republican Mayor Philip Giordano is serving a 37-year sentence in federal prison for sexually abusing 8- and 10-year old girls.

Republican campaign consultant Tom Shortridge was sentenced to three years probation for taking nude photographs of a 15-year old girl.

Republican racist pedophile and United States Senator Strom Thurmond had sex with a 15-year old black girl which produced a child.

Republican pastor Mike Hintz, whom George W. Bush commended during the 2004 presidential campaign, surrendered to police after admitting to a sexual affair with a female juvenile.

Republican legislator Peter Dibble pleaded no contest to having an inappropriate relationship with a 13-year-old girl.

Republican Congressman Donald “Buz” Lukens was found guilty of having sex with a female minor and sentenced to one month in jail.

Republican fundraiser Richard A. Delgaudio was found guilty of child porn charges and paying two teenage girls to pose for sexual photos.

Republican activist Mark A. Grethen convicted on six counts of sex crimes involving children.

Republican activist Randal David Ankeney pleaded guilty to attempted sexual assault on a child.

Republican Congressman Dan Crane had sex with a female minor working as a congressional page.

Republican activist and Christian Coalition leader Beverly Russell admitted to an incestuous relationship with his step daughter.

plot said...

More...Republican governor Arnold Schwarzenegger allegedly had sex with a 16 year old girl when he was 28.

Republican congressman and anti-gay activist Robert Bauman was charged with having sex with a 16-year-old boy he picked up at a gay bar.

Republican Committee Chairman Jeffrey Patti was arrested for distributing a video clip of a 5-year-old girl being raped.

Republican activist Marty Glickman (a.k.a. “Republican Marty”), was taken into custody by Florida police on four counts of unlawful sexual activity with an underage girl and one count of delivering the drug LSD.

Republican legislative aide Howard L. Brooks was charged with molesting a 12-year old boy and possession of child pornography.

Republican Senate candidate John Hathaway was accused of having sex with his 12-year old baby sitter and withdrew his candidacy after the allegations were reported in the media.

Republican preacher Stephen White, who demanded a return to traditional values, was sentenced to jail after offering $20 to a 14-year-old boy for permission to perform oral sex on him.

Republican talk show host Jon Matthews pleaded guilty to exposing his genitals to an 11 year old girl.

Republican anti-gay activist Earl “Butch” Kimmerling was sentenced to 40 years in prison for molesting an 8-year old girl after he attempted to stop a gay couple from adopting her.

Republican Party leader Paul Ingram pleaded guilty to six counts of raping his daughters and served 14 years in federal prison.

Republican election board official Kevin Coan was sentenced to two years probation for soliciting sex over the internet from a 14-year old girl.

Republican politician Andrew Buhr was charged with two counts of first degree sodomy with a 13-year old boy.

Republican politician Keith Westmoreland was arrested on seven felony counts of lewd and lascivious exhibition to girls under the age of 16 (i.e. exposing himself to children).

Republican anti-abortion activist John Allen Burt was charged with sexual misconduct involving a 15-year old girl.

Republican County Councilman Keola Childs pleaded guilty to molesting a male child.

Republican activist John Butler was charged with criminal sexual assault on a teenage girl.

Republican candidate Richard Gardner admitted to molesting his two daughters.

Republican Councilman and former Marine Jack W. Gardner was convicted of molesting a 13-year old girl.

Republican County Commissioner Merrill Robert Barter pleaded guilty to unlawful sexual contact and assault on a teenage boy.

Republican City Councilman Fred C. Smeltzer, Jr. pleaded no contest to raping a 15 year-old girl and served 6-months in prison.

Republican activist Parker J. Bena pleaded guilty to possession of child pornography on his home computer and was sentenced to 30 months in federal prison and fined $18,000.

plot said...


Republican parole board officer and former Colorado state representative, Larry Jack Schwarz, was fired after child pornography was found in his possession.

Republican strategist and Citadel Military College graduate Robin Vanderwall was convicted in Virginia on five counts of soliciting sex from boys and girls over the internet.

Republican city councilman Mark Harris, who is described as a “good military man” and “church goer,” was convicted of repeatedly having sex with an 11-year-old girl and sentenced to 12 years in prison.

Republican businessman Jon Grunseth withdrew his candidacy for Minnesota governor after allegations surfaced that he went swimming in the nude with four underage girls, including his daughter.

Republican director of the “Young Republican Federation” Nicholas Elizondo molested his 6-year old daughter and was sentenced to six years in prison.

Republican benefactor of conservative Christian groups, Richard A. Dasen Sr., was charged with rape for allegedly paying a 15-year old girl for sex. Dasen, 62, who is married with grown children and several grandchildren, has allegedly told police that over the past decade he paid more than $1 million to have sex with a large number of young women.

Republican Speaker of the House Dennis Hastert was indicted on federal charges of structuring bank withdrawals after prosecutors alleged Hastert had molested at least four boys as young as 14 and attempted to compensate his victims and subsequently conceal the transactions. Hastert eventually admitted that he sexually abused the boys whom he had coached decades earlier, and was sentenced to fifteen months in prison.

Republican Tim Nolan, chairman of Donald Trump’s presidential campaign in Kentucky, pled guilty to child sex trafficking and on February 11, 2018 he was sentenced to serve 20 years in prison.

Republican state Senator Ralph Shortey was indicted on four counts of human trafficking and child pornography. In November 2017, he pleaded guilty to one count of child sex trafficking in exchange for the dropping of the other charges.

plot said...

But DO remember folks! The Glover "essay" and the super sekret vocabulary of pizza toppings are what matter most!

Just ignore everything else.


It's funny how people go after pedophiles and you get so concerned that it's "your" pedos they're going after.
They're going after all of them. No one has time for your shit @plot, but you may continue to try.


you ready @plot?
I've never been to Africa remember.

plot said...

"You showed up as predicted"

Physician heal thyself.

plot said...

" No one has time for your shit @plot"

Physician heal thyself.

What, actual pedophiles don't matter to you?

You like the fantasy...of what, precisely?


Seems like those are matters for the court now.
As one day soon it will be for Spielberg.
Justice will be served in'sha'Allah

SimplyMason0 said...

@Vessimede Barstool
Look up the blind item "Long Time Coming" and the reveal on Judith Barsi
There is also the American Dad clip too
Also theres some shady connection with Spielberg and Polanski that might bleed into Indiana Jones's backstory in the first movie.
Youtuber Mr Gunk apparently has some connection with a stand in from the movie "Empire of the Sun"


What's on that cell phone?

plot said...


Yes, but don't you see a connection in my list, a fact that runs through them forming a possible network?


Yeah, parsing that Glover chaos, that's gonna uncover something YUGE!


You mean The Church? The CIA aligned Republicans? The ones represented by the Bush family, mentioned in this blind: http://www.crazydaysandnights.net/2017/11/todays-blind-items-st-charles-house-of.html?m=1
Marco Rubio is a queen but this blind is about JEB!
I told you, you're fun.
Every time you do this I will connect dots for others.

Unknown said...

I'm totally down with all the SS guesses but I came across this old blind from 2013 that viewed him as favorable - which made me wonder -Enty when did you know, what you know about the A+++ director?

Look in the mirror, scrud. said...

Get out of here with that. Scroll on, it’s easy!

TheBreakfastLunch&Dinnerclub said...

Right and people like you are why serial predators in power are never questioned.

TheBreakfastLunch&Dinnerclub said...

I found the South Park episode on Spielberg extremely concerning after reading through the blinds that point to him.


Next level: http://www.savethechildren.org/site/c.8rKLIXMGIpI4E/b.8755419/k.2EC5/DreamWorks.htm

DreamWorks+Spielberg+Geffen+Children+Save the Children=RAPE

AlleyKat said...

Crikey! Gotta love Crispian Glover!

SimplyMason0 said...

@Purple Yoda
The stuff about Spielberg came out rather recently. Again, look up the blinds I mentioned in my post.

I get the impression that stuff regarding Spielberg is a more hidden secret, as opposed to say, Dan Schneider, Harvey Wienstien, and Bryan Singer. Even a Himmm was shocked to hear of this claim.

AlleyKat said...

Mr Glover is genius! ❤❤❤


Let's connect more dots?
According to @plot I am a delusional fabricated persona who has never been to Guinea. I can imagine everyone reading his posts are thouroughly convinced.
But this Ibrahima Diallo guy at Save the Children...
Finish this delusional rant for me if you can.

AlleyKat said...


plot said...

"According to @plot I am a delusional fabricated persona who has never been to Guinea"

hee! No sweetie, it's simpler than that. Whether you have been to Guinea or not, it doesn't matter on an anonymous message board. Appealing to authority has no measure here.

If you are so concerned that people should believe your little stories, you should construct a website with your proof.

Doug said...

They can't destroy it if you don't watch their new version of it...


Then why do you try to silence and discredit on this anonymous scif drop

Todd Brink said...

@nachocheese you have the best blocking feature possible.....scroll past and ignore.

Kate said...

Little girl from Florida project filming with him in Ireland now - ugh

trufflepig said...

I'm surprised that youtube video about Spielberg by 'Mr. Gunk' hasn't been taken down yet.

plot said...

Who have I silenced? How is that even possible here?

As far as discrediting, that is for others to judge, not me. I'm merely shocked how the pizza topping conspiracy theorists are trying so very hard to ignore the conspiracies right under our collective noses, that are reported on, where the dots are not difficult to connect, which are leading to REAL arrests and indictments.

Why ignore those?

Schneiderisnext said...

Yes @plot sure there's a republican network.

But what is this blind about?

A Hollywood director remaking a classic.

Spielberg fits.

@geeljire's copy-paste applies to spielberg

Yours is an attempt to slide the thread into talking about something else. TOTALLY UNRELATED

AGAIN your list has merits too.

But it has nothing at all to do with this particular subject.

I'm fine with you attempting to debunk something.

But you always do more than debunk. You overcompensate in the opposite direction.

I think you call it "whataboutism" when you accuse other posters of it.

We all just want to play nicely, in our sandbox.

xyzxyz33 said...

Goonies is one of my favorite movies of all time.
That being said, when looking at it more in depth,
I realized that all of the sh+t happening in the movie takes
place in the BASEMENT of a PIZZA place.
There's some sick pedo sh+t in that movie I never saw before.
Lots of innuendos.

Torturing Chunk in the basement?
Locking him in the closet with a dead guy?
There's some really sick sh+t, but the movie is so fun, it's easily overlooked.

All I'm saying is, there is a lot of pizza pedo references in movies.

plot said...


Sadly, I was not the one who slid this board into a discussion of Pizzagate. If I were, I would humbly apologise to you and everyone else.

My point in publishing all those names was to present harsh facts against the accusations (or whatever they are)of Glover.

Spielberg is one strange dude. He is obsessed with kids and putting them in terrifying situations. The complexity of the human soul does not interest him at all, in fact, he seems to be revolted by it. I don't like his films.

I guess he could be a pedophile or he could be just a weird fucking dude. When we get some sort of confirmation of some sexual abuse by SS, I'll show up and let you say "I told you so" while eating some crow.

SimplyMason0 said...

Guys, the pizza references were all shit made by 4chan culture. Its just a meme, and they found a way to make it fit in the Hilary e-mails. There is no 100% proof that the code made is legit. Its just like that stupid hanky code shit too where a bunch of right wingers got scared over some gay biker thing they found on Wikipedia. Now, I am not saying those emails didn't have code(dominos on pizza? wtf?), but I don't find some of the stuff I listed to be credible. For all I know, they could be talking about drugs

Now there is something going on with Comet Ping Pong (and the establishments near it), so don't mix my words around. Theres other stuff on Podesta and Clintons to see it. Instead of looking for pizza memes, you should look into those pedophile symbols. Those symbols have been around for years too. There are some organizations that blatantly used them. Some including the musicians Comet Ping Pong promote and a neighboring Besta Pizza. One of the organizations was also connected to a blind item on a "Boys Club" Enty talked about a few months ago too.

Unknown said...

Hey, @Plot

Ah, the basement. You mean the one that Alefantis mentioned in an interview, that's housed in the same building as CPP, in a different "restaurant" called Buck's Hunting and Fishing? (Which, by the way, is owned by Alefantis as well; they share the industrial refrigerator and dumdumdum, the basement.)

And I quote:
"James Alefantis, owner of Comet Ping Pong in D.C., doesn't build his pizza sauce with DOP San Marzanos. ... Last year, Alefantis estimates, he bought 12 tons of Toigo tomatoes, which Stello turned into sauce and canned before trucking the jars to the basement at Buck's Fishing & Camping, Alefantis' other restaurant nearby." August 22, 2013

Oh, and there's this...look at the property listing for Bucks:


TWO STORIES!!!! That's how it's listed. The same as Comet!


See, people who don't do due diligence in their research don't seem to know/understand that Alefantis owns multiple restaurants housed on the same block/building. Question: how does a man slinging pizza get to be on GQ's Top 50 powerful people in DC? I mean, a city full of politicians, and it's *pizza* that gives this guy clout? http://www.gq.com/gallery/50-most-powerful-people-in-washington-dc#slide=49

Want to know how to piss Alefantis off? Ask him about Pegasus Museum, where the public isn't allowed. He's awfully touchy about it getting attention. Hey, are you aware that diplomats and the like can transport "art" without going through customs? That means a private shipping channel.

What I find amusing (as in blatant slant) is that your list of creepers are all Repubs. You don't think that Dems have their own waste-of-life shitlist?
As uncomfortable as it is to think about it, the Rs and Ds play for the same team, have since 1988. That's when they brokered a deal to share power and exclude third parties from gaining a foothold on the federal level. The League of Women Voters had, up until '88, sponsored the presidential debates. They declined to do so when that shit deal was made, as the LWV felt it did a huge disservice to the American people, and to the nation at large. So, despite the theatrics, establishment players on both sides are buddies working toward a common goal. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=e6ECHHDn_TA

BOTH sides are corrupt.
BOTH sides house pedophiles.
BOTH sides are subject to blackmail (hello Brownstone Ops)

Anyone telling you otherwise is lying or pushing a bullshit 'narrative.'

Unknown said...

Hey, @ SimplyMasonZero

It wasn't 4chan that created the emails in the Podesta leaks. One such email discussed a handkerchief Podesta left behind at a friend's house. The handkerchief was described as having a "map that seems pizza-related." Given the common pedophile code phrase "cheese pizza", [ means 'child porn' ] some readers suspected "pizza-related" may have been a reference to child sex abuse. The suspected use of "pizza" as a codeword led us to investigate a pizza restaurant mentioned in one of Podesta's emails, namely Comet Pizza and Ping Pong, owned by an associate of the Podestas.

Enter in the Instagram of Alefantis.


"You showed up as predicted and now I'm ready to take this shit to major league, 100+ comments!"


Google "Podesta art collection!"
Did you know David Brock is James "Alefantis" Rothschild's ex-boyfriend?
Did you know David Brock used to own a beach house in Rehoboth Beach, Delaware? Biden has one there too.
Did you hear about Earl Bradley?
Did you know Beau Biden tried to do the right thing and died for it?
Do you now better understand these Saturn metaphors and imagery?

SimplyMason0 said...

@Mandi Rei Serra

>Given the common pedophile code phrase "cheese pizza"

Only on 4chan. All of that Cheese Pizza stuff was made on 4chan. Thats the joke/meme. CP is a term often joked about in those circles. Other things like Captain Planet, Captain Picard, and even the admin Christopher Poole. Cheese Pizza is the most common. They were the ones that made that. Also the site was made in 2004 I believe. So that guy talking about The Goonies kinda fell for the slang. Sadly, it is slang used by pedophiles on the site as well. Point is, the cheese pizza stuff were from their own people. The code was taken seriously because of some anon from 4chan(or was it 8chan? Those people are fucking worse when it comes to pedophilia) and a lot of people, who probably don't browse there, fell for some of it. And I must repeat: I do believe code is in the e-mails, just not the one #Pizzagaters use.

I also believe the Instagram is legit. I did not doubt that in my post.

Kikibunny said...

By plots definition awhile back I am a democrat (i didnt vote bcuz i cant stand the party but i did send bernie $27)...but I definitely dont lean left enough to defend pedophiles in or out of any party...plots list has convicted republicans...ss dg and the clinton posse have never been convicted and need to be if they are guilty. IMO, It is a CRIME to obfuscate with political BS...i personally believe they are guilty...However, in the interest of free speech i really enjoy it when plot, the tiger and schnieder go at it.

Weekittylass said...

Ahhhh, Tiger, you beat me to the Brock reference. Let us not forget that Brock also owns CorrectTheRecord.org that infamously trolled the DM by red arrowing, by the thousands, any Trump positive comments running up to the election. Why has no one called out that Brock-Hilliary connection yet are rabid over fecesbook and goggle? I sent my son a copy of your Quran post to translate to make sure you were on the up and up. Unfortunately for Crispin, Utopia will never exist because, you know, humans. Oh yeah, Plot, triggered, again. The wueen of identity politics. Don't bother Plot. I don't care.

Weekittylass said...

I like the typo. It stays. Covfefe.




It's Arnon Milchan
It's the Mossad
it's DreamWorks
It's every Church front

So no one mistakes me as some sort of anti-Netflix bigot, I strongly recommend the Korean film "Steel Rain." While watching the film, ask yourself what the Red Church and Red Cross symbolize.
Then slap yourself in the face because predictive programming is a delusion conspiracy.
Thanks for your help, @plot. we did it.


And say alhamdulilah Hillary isn't your president after all

El Roy 13 said...

Does anyone remember when that guy was arrested for breaking into the Spielberg compound, maybe two decades ago? He had duct tape, I think a ball gag, etc., and if memory serves me, a manifesto of what he either wanted to do to ss, and or to his army of adopted kids. It was definitely sexually based, and with vengeance. Now, w/ all of this ss chatter, and that repulsive Heather o'rourke sodomy info, I wonder if it wasn't a payback plan, by one of ss vics. Thoughts?

Unknown said...


Consider who "those" people are; John Podesta served as Bill Clinton's Chief of Staff. As such, he was one of the handful of "masters" of the CIA. Hillary Clinton, as Sec of State, was another "master."

CIA is known for shady shit. They work hand-in-hand with various military contractors, like Halliburton and DynCorp, both of which got busted for trafficking women and children through the Eastern bloc in the 90's.

Funny fact: "Pizda" is slang for pussy/ass in Slavic-based languages.

It's not much of a stretch to think that those who enslaved women and children in the 90's could have shared what they thought of as amusing slang with their coworkers/friends and such, where it got Americanized into a double entendre not meant to be picked up by the world at large.

Sd Auntie said...

Lord have mercy. Geejire should,write a book ....

Itttt said...

There are SCUM on BOTH sides of the aisle. Hell, they have far more in common with each other than their projected/staged 'differences'.

Plot, I say burn them ALL to that list you posted for their crimes. I will give you those if you give me mine...because at the end of the day, they are ALL SCUM, and more often than not, in one or more formal and/or loose/informal group of powerful elites that commit these crimes against humanity. There is no punishment that is righteous and just enough for them, but that doesn't mean we shouldn't round them ALL up and try to give them ALL what they deserve, whether "right", "left", "Relublican", "Democrat", "straight", "gay", "Male", female", and/or "other" in one or more of those classifications.


Itttt said...

They want us WEAK. They want us DIVIDED. Because they rightfully fear most a united front. Together we are strong and capable of ANYTHING.

So, again I implore you all - no more partisan bullshit. Let ALL the evildoers, ne'erdowells and their protectors, cronies, and ilk rightfully fear the wrath of the people.

This shit will NOT continue. It is not going to end well for the scum.

SimplyMason0 said...

@Mandi Rei Serra
Well "those" people from 8chan were the "heroes" talking about Pizzagate in the first place. The reason google blocked them was because they had pedophilia and doxxing due the admin's stances on free speech. Moot(Christopher Poole) tightens the rules on 4chan more than one would think.

Point is the memes on 4chan bleed into Pizzagate for better or worse. Then I see other people get super paranoid about when the origins of the phrase originally came from old internet memes from 2006.

I'm not arguing against the other proof people have posted which are legit.

Unknown said...

west side story casting sheet - is 15 age appropriate for the show?

LeahBryar said...

Thank you all.
I like the full quotes instead of the links.
I like all the discussions.
Thank you Geeljire for some interesting info.

MattDaddy said...


Sign Name Below said...

Very interesting! I wonder now too!

Sign Name Below said...

+10000000 @Ittt !!!

plot said...


"There are SCUM on BOTH sides of the aisle. Hell, they have far more in common with each other than their projected/staged 'differences'."

So what? Which of the parties is more likely to protect your rights and interests? Which is interested in protecting the environment? Which is committed to helping the poor and disenfranchised?

I don't give a single shit if my pols are your "Scum". I want them to do a job. Their characters mean nothing to me as long as they work for the people of the USA and not their corporate or Russian minders.

plot said...


One more thing - it doesn't take a network to be an active child abuser. Most of the names I printed above abused and molested children without the help of any network, it looks like to me.

The ways to get close to children to take advantage of them are numerous and pedos are cunning as hell. I really wasn't trying to claim there was an alternative network in the GOP, though there might be I guess. What I'm trying to say is that it's perhaps a lot simpler not to join or depend on a network, since the opportunities to abuse children are so many without it.

Schneiderisnext said...


I know you're trying to seem "reasonable"

But I'm going to repeat what you said and be very, very blunt.

Schneiderisnext said...

The most disenfranchised social class is children.

Under 18 in the US, you basically have no rights separate from your guardian.

Schneiderisnext said...

Pretty much every country this exists. Not just the USA. The only difference is the exact age in which you are granted equal rights

Schneiderisnext said...

"There are SCUM on BOTH sides of the aisle. Hell, they have far more in common with each other than their projected/staged 'differences'."


"So what? Which of the parties is more likely to protect your rights and interests? Which is interested in protecting the environment? Which is
committed to helping the poor and disenfranchised?"

I don't give a single shit if my pols are your "Scum". I want them to do a job. Their characters mean nothing to me as long as they work for the people of the USA and not their corporate or Russian minders.

Schneiderisnext said...

If none of them are protecting "CHILDREN" from being abused and raped....neither party is "working for the people of the USA"

Neither party is "committed to helping the poor and disenfranchised"

Frankly. I'd rather be under RUSSIAN DICTATOR as long as CHILDREN aren't raped by the political elite and their protectorate.

Schneiderisnext said...

What's worse @plot? Stealing an election or raping a baby?

This isn't a false equivalence. You've forced this point @plot

DaToneBone said...

Thanks Schneiderisnext! Like what your doing and saying.

plot said...

"If none of them are protecting "CHILDREN" from being abused and raped....neither party is "working for the people of the USA""

I think you are wrong. There are many people on both sides of the aisle who work very hard on ending child abuse. Sure, only one party is willing to put money into stopping it (Obama's legislation to fight human trafficking in 2009) but neither party wants to see it continue. Law enforcement in this country is committed to fighting it.

We try to create stability around the world so that conditions don't become so bad that people are doing things like selling their children to survive. Do we get it right 100% of the time? Hell no. Do we still fuck up and create chaos? Fuck yes. But as a country, with the best information from our economists and social scientists, we are trying to move towards the goal of a peaceful world where, among other things, children are protected and valued...

Except for our current shithead in office that is.

"Frankly. I'd rather be under RUSSIAN DICTATOR as long as CHILDREN aren't raped by the political elite and their protectorate."

Okay, we're done. That's it, you're a jackass. Which countries do you think are most likely to engage in human trafficking in the most debased and depraved ways? DICTATORSHIPS you ass! Dictators thrive in the instabilities, poverty and abject fear - environments where things like child abuse thrive .

You know how many children are ground up like meat in dictatorships? Look into the child soldiers of Uganda or the child brides, under 10 years old, in Yemen. What about the young boys in the Pakistani maddrasses who are dressed up as girls and sold into sexual service to older men? Oh but Schneider things that's okay because there's no connection to super sekret labs, Clintons and Epstien.

You are an idiot.

plot said...

"What's worse @plot? Stealing an election or raping a baby?"

If you can prove that stealing elections prevents the raping of babies, you might have a point.


Schneiderisnext said...


"Whether you have been to Guinea or not, it doesn't matter on an anonymous message board. Appealing to authority has no measure here."


@Plot: "Thank-you so much chickensashimi! Not being a scientist myself, it's been difficult to explain why these Super Sekret Lab blinds are so off base, so deliberately false, that it taints all Enty's blinds unfortunately."

A fucking perfect example of @plot appealing to false authority.

Again. @plot falsely appealing to the authority of @chickenashimi a "scientist"

Sekrit said...

@soleJahway I had no idea about it but I did find an old LAT article- http://articles.latimes.com/1998/jun/18/local/me-61135

"Spielberg, speaking of his continuing fear, appealed to Santa Monica Superior Court Judge Steven C. Suzukawa to harshly punish the stalker, Jonathan Norman, 31.... Later investigation showed that Norman had recorded the names of Spielberg's family members in his day planner, along with a shopping list including items like eye masks, dog collars and chloroform."

also Jonathan Norman's alleged reasoning- https://www.thefreelibrary.com/WHY+I+PLOTTED+TO+KIDNAP+SPIELBERG%3B+Stalker's+rage+at+job+snub.-a061460745

plot said...

Idiot, listen to my words.

I never claimed authority and appealed to it, get it?

The logical fallacy of appealing to authority pertains to claims one makes about oneself.

Jesus, take a rhetoric or logic class, idiot.

Schneiderisnext said...

And I'm trying to be nice while pointing out @plot's contradictions.

He calls me an idiot.

Insults are such a greatttt argument. You really are winning hearts and minds aren't you @plot?

Schneiderisnext said...

"Whether you have been to Guinea or not, it doesn't matter on an anonymous message board. Appealing to authority has no measure here."

Yet you are swayed by somebody claiming to be a "biologist"?

I'm not saying you are claiming false authority @plot. I'm showing it has "sway here" because you have already fallen victim to it.

Dude. Look in the mirror before calling people out.

plot said...

There is no contradiction. I did not appeal to my own authority at any time.

Oh, and you are winning hearts and minds by saying dictators would end child abuse????

Respond please, idiot, why do you think a dictatorship would end child abuse? What about the examples I sited?

plot said...

"I'm not saying you are claiming false authority @plot."

Then I did not appeal to authority, according to the rules of logic. Get it yet?

Schneiderisnext said...

@schneider: "What's worse @plot? Stealing an election or raping a baby?"

@plot: "If you can prove that stealing elections prevents the raping of babies, you might have a point."

Note the deflection everyone!!!

@Plot can't answer the simple question is theft worse than rape?

plot said...

And Schneider can't prove that theft ends rape, so therefore the question is nonsensical.

I'm not playing to an imaginary audience Schneider. Why are you?

I'm only talking to YOU, an idiot apparently.

Schneiderisnext said...

"I'm not saying you are claiming false authority @plot."

Then I did not appeal to authority, according to the rules of logic. Get it yet?

Whether or not you make the claim, appeal to authority is when you say somebody is correct because of their qualifications.

You are appealing to somebody else's claim of authority.

You don't know "chickenashimi" is a biologist. But you appeal to his authority as a scientist to bolster your points.

You are appealing to someone else's "appeal to authority"

Clearly an appeal to authority holds "sway over you" if it confirms your biases.

Queen of Contradiction.

plot said...

"appeal to authority is when you say somebody is correct because of their qualifications."

Nope, that is not the logical fallacy.

Go look it up.

"You are appealing to someone else's "appeal to authority""

That makes utterly no sense.

Schneiderisnext said...

No @ plot

I dont have to prove that ending theft ends RAPE.

Im asking what crime you find more reprehensible?

And you keep dodging.

I find RAPE worse than theft. Just me tho.

Bullshit. It's a public forum. We aren't emailing. I'm talking to everyone, not just you @plot

plot said...

"I dont have to prove that ending theft ends RAPE"

Yes you do if you want the choice between them to have any validity.

Since rape doesn't end theft, and theft doesn't end rape, making the choice of one over the other is stupid, it's idiotic, it's a dumb question.

Schneiderisnext said...

I urge everyone to look up what an APPEAL TO AUTHORITY is:

@Plot is caught

"Appeal to Authority
argumentum ad verecundiam

(also known as: argument from authority, ipse dixit)

Description: Insisting that a claim is true simply because a valid authority or expert on the issue said it was true, without any other supporting evidence offered."

Schneiderisnext said...

By appealing to an ANONYMOUS "biologist"

@PLOT fallaciouslt appeals to authority.

But he critiques other people who do the same.

plot said...

"I'm talking to everyone, not just you"

Everyone being whom?

Why do you imagine some crowd reading all this? Does it excite you?

Schneiderisnext said...

I'd rather be stolen from than raped @plot

I guess @ plot would rather be raped.

plot said...

"By appealing to an ANONYMOUS "biologist" "


You're losing it old man.

plot said...

"I'd rather be stolen from than raped @plo"

You can still be the victim of both, having no choice in the matter, so your preferences aren't important to reality.

Schneiderisnext said...

Again just because @Plot doesn't seem to understand or remember what @plot has said in other blinds...



"I do have knowledge of microbiology and biochemistry. There is no way this blind is true. Not because I think that a conspiracy on this level is impossible (I do know about MKULTRA and the testing of biological warfare in San Francisco, for two examples). I know scary programs are designed and carried out by humans. However, I also know about the state of science as far as "weaponizing" microbes, and genetic engineering to increase virulence and infectiousness."

@PLOT "Thank-you so much chickensashimi! Not being a scientist myself, it's been difficult to explain why these Super Sekret Lab blinds are so off base, so deliberately false, that it taints all Enty's blinds unfortunately."


Yet you critique geeljire for claiming they've been to Africa.


Just admit you appealed to authority and I'll let it go.

But I can't let you KEEP contradicting yourself.

Schneiderisnext said...

Agreed. But if you could choose just one, you wouldn't have a preference?

You're being obtuse.

plot said...


What was false?

Where did I appeal to my own authority?

Schneiderisnext said...




Stop muddling the waters dude.

You false appealed to AUTHORITY

I never accused you of claiming you were an authority

(I know better than that)

Whether it's God, 99% of scientists, or "CHICKENASHIMI THE MICROBIOLOGIST"

If you appeal to somebody else's stature, that is an appeal to authority.

plot said...

"But if you could choose just one, you wouldn't have a preference?"

Since I'm not a 12-year-old playing Would You Rather, I realize the choice is invalid.

plot said...

"Stop muddling the waters dude."

Stop inventing definitions to terms you don't understand.

Schneiderisnext said...

Well I guess all crimes should be punished equally then right @plot?

Murder and jaywalking are tried equally in @plot's court of law

Schneiderisnext said...

The law is obviously tiered and justifiably so.

It's perfectly reasonable to consider the scale of a crime.

It's why people aren't found guilty when they kill in self defense.

But I guess a judge can't consider the possibilities of a case because since isn't 12?

Your logic sucks.

Schneiderisnext said...

Oooo i said "muddling the waters" instead of "muddying the waters"

I guess you really got me there @plot

plot said...

"Well I guess all crimes should be punished equally then"

Is that your theory?

Schneiderisnext said...

*cited Not "sited" @plot

I'm sorry to correct your spelling, but I have to tit for tat you @ this point

Also the USA allows child brides too. Stop being so racist to the people of Yemen @plot.

"In most states, children under 16 can be married too. In the 25 states [1] which have an absolute minimum age set by statute, this age varies between 13 and 17, while in 25 states there is no statutory minimum age if other legal conditions are met. Although in such states there is no set minimum age by statute, the traditional common law minimum age is 14 for boys and 12 for girls - ages which have been confirmed by case law in some states.[2] Over the past 15 years, more than 200,000 minors married in US, and in Tennessee girls as young as 10 were married in 2001.[3]"


Also in the USA parents dress up their little boys and parade them to men

Ever heard of Lactatia? The 6 year old drag queen?

The problem is ubiquitous.

I said I'd rather live in a dictatorship IF KIDS AREN'T ABUSED

Obviously I don't want to live in a dictatorship.

But your worst case scenario of "russians taking over america" doesn't really matter. Pedophiles and Abusers already rule the USA.

Schneiderisnext said...

I don't care who is connected to Trump, Epstein, Podesta, or Clinton

I want the guilty discovered, punished, and prevented from abusing

You make things partisan @Plot

To mkost of us this has nothing to do with political party

plot said...

"Pedophiles and Abusers already rule the USA."

Only when you are wearing that ugly confirmation bias (another logical fallacy which I expect you to mangle.)

"Obviously I don't want to live in a dictatorship."

If you could cure you of your fantasies of a world full of pedos, you would, despite all the evidence that dictatorships are the most stressful for populations thus leading to MORE child abuse.

Schneider don't care!

El Roy 13 said...

Hear! Hear!

And neither did chit for decades over the fact that the possession of a plant, in either live or dried form, harbored stiffer penalties for adults and children alike, than that of an adult who had been found to have had sexual relations with an infant, toddler or child.

Schneiderisnext said...

I guess @plot cares more about Yemen child brides rather than the 100s of thousands occurring in the United States.

It's just brown, dictatorships that have endemic pedophilia problem

(all examples you cite! Yemen, Pakistan, Uganda! Only Brown People! How delightfully racist!)

Schneiderisnext said...

Seeing as I'm the only person to provide definitions for the fallacies, I don't know why You're still nothing @ plot

I'm still waiting for your definition of "appeal to authority"

plot said...

"It's just brown, dictatorships that have endemic pedophilia problem "

Your words.

"I'm still waiting for your definition of "appeal to authority"

Google not working for you over there?

Schneiderisnext said...

Goodnight @plot, until next-time.

El Roy 13 said...

@both plot and schneider (and I apologize now for jumping into your discussion, however....), this, your row, reminds me of, after I read the article in the DM on Peter Sculley of the destruction of Daisy, "fame," I kind of lost my mind (it was a toddler snuff film, and the article went into pretty graphic description). I said to a sjw that I know well, my bio dad, "how can ANYTHING else take precedence," (in re: to the Peter Sculley's of the world), and his response was, "you mean to tell me you don't think anything should be done about the damage being done to the environment (or something to that effect)."

The topics are apples and oranges. But yet, in all seriousness, you hear of a two year old child, strung upside down, sexually tortured, then beaten to death - on film! And this was done TO BROADCAST! For me, NOTHING ELSE MATTERS. Nothing (than stopping this). And anyone who is already working within The Establishment who isn't focused solely on eradicating that - are a lie. For, if it doesn't begin with the kids, where does it begin?

I hope I explained as I intended.

If anyone wants to read the article I mentioned, I believe it was in the DM around Nov 2016.

El Roy 13 said...

Wow! Thanks! I haven't checked out the link w Norman's reasoning yet, though will. But as for what he had, etc., I couldn't remember precisely. I just remembered feeling that it was very sinister, so again, I thank you for refreshing my memory.

Cadmium77 said...

The Woodman7:12 AM

The Speilberg stuff is just stunning to me. Can any one of you nice folks direct me to a blind or blinds that elaborates on this theory?


totaji said...


totaji said...

It’s called whataboutism. It’s a fallacy, and is championed by low grade internet arguers everywhere.

plot said...

"I don't care who is connected to Trump, Epstein, Podesta, or Clinton"

So you say as you ignore Nader in the Trump Factory, Trump's connection to Epstein, and as far as I know you haven't connected any Republican name I posted above to your vast Network or your Church. Hm. Seems to me all of that would be right up your alley...except it isn't, is it.

plot said...

@Mandi Rei Serra

"BOTH sides are corrupt.
BOTH sides house pedophiles.
BOTH sides are subject to blackmail"

Yet the only side you seem interested in is the one with fantasy basement torture chambers, a secret pizza topping language and some art that looks like...art.

Why is that?

If both sides are equally corrupt (which they aren't if you are paying any attention), then why focus so tenaciously on the one side with the LEAST amount of convicted pedos and porn possessions?

What's your agenda?

Schneiderisnext said...


We DISAGREE on your FRAMING of the argument.

Just because you CLAIM that the Democrats have fewer convicted Pedos, doesn't make it true. No matter how insistently you REPEAT IT.


NO ANECODOTES. NO LISTS. Something comparative.

Schneiderisnext said...

I've never said Republicans are clean. I'VE NEVER SAID TRUMP IS CLEAN.

Web-search my username. It's very unique. My post history stands for itself.









Schneiderisnext said...

And for anyone wanting to see my opinions on CONVICTED PEDOPHILE GEORGE NADER


Here's another time @Plot GROSSLY MISCHARACTERIZES me

And as of 3/21 the spooked lil' guy STILL HASN'T RESPONDED

plot said...


Who is this "we" that you imagine you are?

"Just because you CLAIM that the Democrats have fewer convicted Pedos, doesn't make it true."

Except I never claimed that, but it should be interesting to YOU, right? As someone who only cares about pedos? I mean, that should be exactly in your wheelhouse considering your own statements above. So where are your stats of deep concern?
"I've never said Republicans are clean."

Yet focus mainly on Super Sekret Dem Konnections to your mythical church. Everything breaks down to Podesta, the Clinton Foundation, photos on beaches with Bill rather than REAL and VERIFIED connections to the GOP...

Sure, you have a hardon for Mormons as well without differentiating between fundamentalists and regular old common variety Mormons.


Which is a lazy way out and leads to confirmation bias.

Schneiderisnext said...


Thank you <333

That's my point. I'm of the same mind

Ending PEDOPHILIA is more important than stopping ECO DESTRUCTION.


That's my belief. I'm fine if my generation is the last. As a young person.

I'd feel proud of my species for evolving past pure PREDATION

I don't enjoy living in complacency of institutionalized TORTURE, RAPE, AND ABUSE.


plot said...

"Ending PEDOPHILIA is more important than stopping ECO DESTRUCTION."

Without an ecosystem we all die, dude. What is your knowledge of science exactly?


Which is contradicted by your appreciation for dictatorships. Dictators kill a lot more people and create the conditions for child trafficking more than pizza toppings do.

"I don't enjoy living in complacency of institutionalized TORTURE, RAPE, AND ABUSE."

Then you should learn to appreciate stability for all nations rather than contributing to the exact kinds of instability where children become commodities.

Unknown said...

@ Ella Minnow,

Thank you for your kind words. I do what I do because I want a better world for my kids and future generations. If one does nothing despite having the knowledge, imho, one is enabling.

Schneiderisnext said...

"We" me and you @plot we disagree over how you're framing the institutionalized nature of pedophilia.

(Do I really have to keep repeating myself? You're forcing me to patronize you)

And Jesus dude. How dishonest are you?

You just said Democrats have less convicted Pedos to @MandiReiSerra....7 comments up...


If both sides are equally corrupt (which they aren't if you are paying any attention), then why focus so tenaciously on the one side with the LEAST amount of convicted pedos and porn possessions?"



Either you intentionally lie, have horrible short term memory, or multiple people running your account @plot

Schneiderisnext said...

I believe in life after death @plot, so I'm willing to stand for my moral

I'm sorry you if don't. I understand why that would make you scared and willing to be a pragmatist.

But that moral pragmatism is what allows abuse to continue.


Yeah I saw this.
Plot has been doing this for at least a decade on blind item sites so I think it's time to stop feeding his/her(I can't really tell) nonsense.
For more insight into the psyche of Plot: http://archive.is/BdioO
@schneiderisnext, what you are doing is too important to be distracted by someone of this caliber.

Schneiderisnext said...

Thanks @geeljire, @Plot has managed to divert the blind away from Spielberg yet again. The desperation reeks

But the 1000th monkey is close. We all feel it


P.s. I'm pretty certain this blind will make it to the most viewed if it surpasses 210 comments


J said...

This seems to confirm what Enty said about Spielberg and that girl from Jurassic Park.
WHO in their right mind would try to go to the authorities and say Spielberg was a pedophile?

plot said...

"we disagree over how you're framing the institutionalized nature of pedophilia."

I don't know that I've framed it at all...though chasing windmills of churches and foundations and pizza toppings I find pointless.

"I believe in life after death"

So? I'm not sure I follow.

"I understand why that would make you scared"

Projecting maybe? My beliefs I have not shared, nor will I because they are personal.

"You just said Democrats have less convicted Pedos to @MandiReiSerra"

I was hoping you had a list of similarly convicted Pedos of your chosen enemies. It would make sense for you to have such in that Churchy database of yours. No?

"Plot has been doing this for at least a decade on blind item sites "

Oh that's sweet, but not the case.

Itttt said...

@plot re: "So what? Which of the parties is more likely to protect your rights and interests?"

NEITHER, presently. Only a mere handful on either side of the aisle. The vast majority of BOTH parties is equally complicit in f*cking us ALL over for their own benefit, to line their own pockets, or even "just because".

"Which is interested in protecting the environment?"

NEITHER, presently. Again, one party may "talk the talk" about the environment over the other, but it's ALL lip service as of late, and all for the sake of putting on a farce and a show of it.

"Which is committed to helping the poor and disenfranchised?"

NEITHER party...on this one that is ABSOLUTELY CERTAIN. I am sure some ill informed, ignorant, uneducated and/or delusional among us will scream "the 'liberals'!" "the Democrats!" to this one, however the collective poverty pimps of that party have done NOTHING of any value to actually help the poor and disenfranchised. Welfare handouts of all shapes and sizes to keep the poor and/or disenfranchised doesn't help with anything but to keep them dumb blind stupid and most importantly - IMPOVERISHED, INDEBTED AND UNDER CONTROL. Under the bootheel of their "masters", actually.

Learn some history please: 13th Amendment, which abolished slavery, had 100% Republican support but only 23% Democrat support. 14th Amendment granting citizenship to freed slaves had 94% Republican support and 0% yes ZERO Democrat support. 15th Amendment guaranteeing right to vote for all, had 100% Republican support and 0% yes ZERO Democrat support. Decades and decades of voting for the Democratic party and what have the poor, disenfranchised to show for it?

"I don't give a single shit if my pols are your "Scum". I want them to do a job. Their characters mean nothing to me as long as they work for the people of the USA and not their corporate or Russian minders."

Yet they don't do their job, presuming that job is to represent and care for We The People collectively first and foremost. Their character or lack thereof is the LEAST of their foibles, faults, and soon - problems.

plot said...

"NEITHER, presently"

then you are lazy or not willing to look for other reasons...cognitive dissonance?

"Again, one party may "talk the talk" about the environment over the other, but it's ALL lip service as of late"

Well except for the water and air standards that Obama passed that Trump revoked...

Except for the enlarging of the national parks under Obama that Trump revoked...

Except for the fucking admission that global warming is a thing, which Trump and the GOP will not..

Lazy you.

"Welfare handouts of all shapes and sizes to keep the poor and/or disenfranchised doesn't help with anything"

Except keep people from homelessness and starvation...

" 13th Amendment, which abolished slavery, had 100% Republican support but only 23% Democrat support. "

150 years ago dude. Things have changed since.

Schneiderisnext said...

You've REPEATEDLY framed it as being correlated/more prevalent to a single party.

@plot's mantra: Pedophilia is a Partisan Problem with a Partisan Solution

And you keep doing so. Then BOLDLY LIE and deny saying anything of the sort. Then do it again.

Have you no shame flip-flopping like a flag?

Schneiderisnext said...

Everyone take note:

Caught in a lie so @Plot deflects, and doubles down trying to force me into a partisan position/retribalizes the conversation

@plot: "I was hoping you had a list of similarly convicted Pedos of your chosen enemies. It would make sense for you to have such in that Churchy database of yours. No?"

2 competing lists divided by party is ANECDOTAL. And worthless unless statistically compiled and analyized

It's not proof of anything. But it is an easy way to slide the board into:

Dems v Repubs

I'm gonna take a note from Shia



«Oldest ‹Older   1 – 200 of 316   Newer› Newest»


Popular Posts from the last 30 days