Thursday, July 05, 2018

Blind Items Revealed #6

February 13, 2018

I think it is possible that I may have found a director who is even worse than the Oscar winning A+ list director that has been in this space frequently or even Woody Allen. The director of which I am speaking is an Oscar winner, but not for what you might think. It is shocking actually he does not have more Oscar wins.

I do hope this is in some small part due to his raping and abusing women throughout his career. Although the number of actresses he abused is in the dozens, I am going to focus on just a few of his more notorious crimes.

He raped three tweens during a casting process and gave the role to the tween he said was the one who was the best in bed. He later ordered her to sleep with the much much older foreign born co-star on the movie who would go on to have an A list career. That co-star injured her severely and production had to be stopped for a week to allow her to recover.

The director kept her around for a couple of years under the guise of getting her more roles, but the real reason was he could send her out to find other tweens and early teens to bring back to his place where he would get them drunk or slip them drugs and then rape them. He often filmed these rapes and would film the actress with the other tween and teen females.

In the movie for which he is most famous he had friends of one of his children come to the set with the child. All of the friends were probably no older than 7 or 8. He molested a dozen of them at least during the filming of the movie and filmed many of them. When he died there were hundreds of hours of footage which was some of the most extreme versions of child porn anywhere.

Stanley Kubrik/Peter Sellers

77 comments:

Brayson87 said...

Kubrick, you break my heart.

Chris P said...

Fucking sickening!!

Unknown said...

Who has seen the real version of EWS

cheesegrater15 said...

Holy Shit

Spider Rico said...

Goddammt. Kubrick you fuck. That leaves Coppola for me now. I hope to God he isn't a pedo but after his defense of Salva, I wouldn't be surprised.

DDonna Tarttty said...

I've always had a sick suspicion about Kubrick I've never put in writing. But he leaves hints throughout his work, like that weird issue of Playgirl magazine showing up in "The Shining." And of course how he changed a key plot point in "Lolita" to show a vast network of pedophiles, not a lone predator.

Makes some of the theories about the end of "Eyes Wide Shut"--why is Kidman's character so upset? Why does the daughter suddenly vanish from the mise en scène?--seem more credible. In a bad way.

Tricia13 said...

Oh wait-another “reclusive , quirky,child raping”director..... How odd
Effin fuckface

Tricia13 said...

Any version sucks.
“Eyes Shut Closed” 30 minutes in

Thursday November said...

Kubrick was known for yelling at actresses.

Sellers is the one with all the child porn.

Roxanne said...

And Kubrick didn't "die"...not on his own anyway. So..Hmmm????

totaji said...

Ok! This one is a mother fuckin shocker. My heart is now broken. The last paragraph is about what movie? The Shining, Spartacus and 2001are his most famous. Which is it?

Brayson87 said...

+1 Tricia, these directors should be the most popular guys in prison, not cinema.

AuntieVodka said...

This abhorrent, savage, sub-human sexual abuse of children makes me wonder if there are actual demons among us who have taken on human form. That’s about the only way I can even begin to wrap my mind around any of it. It is anthropomorphic evil.

totaji said...

+1

Tricia13 said...

💯 % Brayson

Cail Corishev said...

The way I read it, Sellers is only referred to in paragraph #3, as the foreign-born co-star who injured a girl. Then the 4th and 5th paragraphs go back to talking about the director, Kubrick.

Joseph P Blow, Kokomo PD said...

All that power and influence and this is how these disgusting men use their privilege. Lower than the scrapings from a pig farmer's Wellingtons.

Sara, Making It Work said...

@totaji
I believe the last paragraph refers to 2001. The original comments would have the info, but as I recall, one of his kids had a cameo role, so it would made sense for her to be on set and bring friends for a visit.

longtimereader said...

Holy s***! my favourite director as well. Is this why he left hollywood for seclusion in england then? the UK is not lacking in paedo networks of the rich and powerful.

Cail Corishev said...

Yeah, I think 2001 has to be considered the movie he's most famous for. It pretty universally ends up as #1 on lists of his best movies. (I thought it was boring. Needed more 'splosions.) It was also filmed in Britian, where he lived, which fits with inviting his child's friends to the set. Looks like The Shining was filmed there too, but even though it's also very popular, it's not going to go down as his magnum opus.

We knew Kubrick was aware of a lot of the occult stuff going on; we just didn't know if he knew from participating or observing. But really, what were the odds that they'd let someone get close enough to the center of things to know as much as he did, without being one of them?

MDAnderson said...

Have a feeling Jack Nicholson was well aware of his behavior.

Kimberly Davis said...

OMG!!!! I am DEAD,

peony said...

The three tween girls who were auditioned, I suspect he’s referring to Lolita?

Dusty Fairy said...

This is VILE!!!! Ewwwww!

totaji said...

Kirk Douglas probably trained him.

Meredith said...

The movie must have been Lolita, and the actress must have been Sue Lyon who was 13 at the time. This makes me so sad, I've been such fans of Peter Sellers and Kubrick but now I'm just sick...

totaji said...

Hmmmm, we need a little help around here! What are your thoughts? How well is this known? What about his mysterious passing?

Unknown said...

that movie also got him killed. showed too much of certain groups in the elites' true culture.

Youtoo said...

NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
WHY???

gauloise said...

@DDonna the Playgirl magazine is to show the father's interest in men, a bit of mise en scene to show that the movie is actually an allegory for danny's sexual abuse at the hands of his father.

I dont get it though, there were no tweener co-stars on Dr Strangelove with Sellers. Lolita had the tweens, and the foreign born co-star on that movie is James Mason.

This is another blind that needs fact checking, whats the point of guessing when the blind gives errant clues?

Joseph P Blow, Kokomo PD said...

Damn, Gauloise. That's some fine detective work.

chillip said...

Sellers was in Lolita.

Dave said...

Sellers was in Lolita

Birdman said...

I was gonna mention, the Sellers connection is from Dr. Strangelove, but there's no tweens in the movie. I guess it happened elsewhere?

Krab said...

Sellers is Quilty in Lolita. Not sure I believe this either.

Rivka Sieff said...

Sellers was in lolita. I saw the films years ago. Its basically the story of a paedophile. But its meant to be a black comedy? In the book shes 12 but its a much loved book. Am i just old fashioned to find this disgusting? And more so the older i get. Maybe it was a different time. When i saw both films years ago it seemed weird more than despicable. Now i feel sickened by it.
Was sue lyon statutorily raped? She was 16. In the UK here it is legal. But still deplorable for a grown ass director and actor to takevadvantage of her. Is prostitution considered a normal part of being an actress? Some of these blinds are hurting my soul. Im hoping its mostly just lies and extreme exaggerations.

gauloise said...

oops thanks sellers got bottom billing on IMDB for lolita, only see him if you click through to full cast list, wouldnt expect that for such a big name

gauloise said...

my faith in the blinds has been restored :)

Youtoo said...

@Rivka "Some of these blinds are hurting my soul."

Couldn't agree more :(

Humor Me said...

Lolita/ Sue Lyon for the first movie, with Sellars as Quilty.
Magnum Opus - 2001

Boo Hearne said...

I vaguely remember posting a Kubrick story long ago. Living & working in London. He was considered a g-o-d in show biz circles. Never cared for him, personally. An American with a poofy doofy name married a poofy doofy Brit and they started a casting agency. Well, that's what they called it, anyway. One of my best girlfriends worked for them. (in more ways than one) We had scheduled a night out with two other gal friends and she asked me to stop by her office to pick her up. She was alone. While she re-applied her make-up she said, "Here, watch this. It's one of Kubrick's audition tapes." I was leaning against her desk as it began and ended up on the floor in front of her desk as it reeled along. What was I watching?!!! I asked her to turn it off. She said, "Wait. I want you to see who is on the roll. She's the one who flatly refused to take her clothes off." And in a few seconds, there she was! A young, talented, gorgeous young dancer and aspiring actress! She didn't get a part (really?) but later became a huge star. She still twinkles! Good for her! I knew he was a dirty bird long, long ago. Hated all his films.

lizness said...

@Boo Hearne? Who is the actress? Charlize Theron?

lizness said...

Also this doesn't surprise me at all. I have heard he was a terror on the set

Boo Hearne said...

Lisness: Charlize wasn't even born when this took place.

Ulf said...

Please, where are the evidence??

T. W. said...

+1 @Unknown

You can only reveal what you get permission to reveal.

Kubrick and all the rest of show biz know so much about these "secret" societies because they are a part if it.

Elephant Cat said...

Sue Lyon was 13.

Jane Hanoi said...

i'd guess the dancer/actress was hepburn or caron?

travis said...

Arthur C Clarke's, author of 2001, long rumored reason for moving to Sri Lanka was so he could enjoy the company of boys. The book was actually written concurrently with the script. Kubrick chose to work with Clarke. And there's no doubt Sellers was a crappy human being. I don't know...still find it hard to accept about Kubrick.

Boo Hearne said...

Jane Hanoi: She was young in 1969 when I saw the tape. She is British. She married well the first time. He got her foot in the door. She divorced him & married someone else. Had a couple of kids. She made her first real film appearance as the heroine of a major hit back in the 70s. She starred in her own TV series. She is much admired and respected. She kept her class and morals when everyone around her was throwing theirs to the wind. I admired her then and admire her now. I wish I had that tape!

fabulous disaster said...

Boo Hearne if the classy lady is who I think it is then the only detail that doesn't quite fit is dancer. Did she have a crash course in dancing for her major career defining role in order to be convincing in her character's backstory? If she is who I think she is she really is to be admired for single handedly forcing a government to change their mind in accordance to what the population thought was absolutely just and overdue.

Viking Song said...

Kubrick was devoted to his wife and daughters. He was not a paedophile and this blind is horse shit. Oh, and to the "poofy doofy" xenophobes talking shit about Britain, there are more paedophiles in America..

OB said...

@Boo I know this isn't a guessing game, but--

Jane Seymour?

AlexJ said...

Boo Hearne: It sounds like Jane Seymour. She just said in a recent Playboy interview that she briefly quit acting after being harassed by a film producer. Also, she was a dancer.

Angela said...

As I wrote on February, the BI is indeed pure bullshit.

At least three of his films have an almost all-male cast, Paths of Glory (one actress, his future wife), Dr. Strangelove (one character) and Full Metal Jacket (two Vietnamese actresses). 2001 has no major female part.

And if the moron currently in charge of the site knew one or two things about Kubrick, he would have realized that Kubrick was living in the UK in the sixties, while his alleged victim, Sue Lyon, was working in the US. There's just no way he could have kept her around for a couple of years.

What's surprising is also the amount of idiots here who say that Kubrick was their favorite filmmaker but it has just changed, due to this blind. If you can't identify fake stories, if you don't have any second thoughts about why one site magically produces 12 blinds a day while any other struggles to get one or two, if you haven't noticed the evolution of the content of the blinds, well, you deserve all the time you're spending on that site.

Also, Kubrick is basically Paul Thomas Anderson's favorite filmmaker, along with Robert Altman and Martin Scorsese. So, one of the four "Himmmm" has picked a website that reveals that Kubrick is a monster to share his private memories, and you don't have any doubts about the veracity of the stories here?

Boo Hearne said...

The beautiful young British ballet dancer turned actress was, indeed, Jane Seymour. She starred in a James Bond film and her career was assured. It took a lot of balls to defy the high and mighty back in those days and still come out on top. She did it. I have always admired her enormously.

Halloweenie said...

Unfortunately, I been knew this one. People reveal themselves. He made Lolita. Which is an apologist movie/ book for pedophiles. SHE ( the child) is the seducer. The adult is entranced by the child's " seductive " behavior. Typical pedo rationale. Also Kubrick allegedly completely destroyed the mental and emotional health of the lead actress in the shining. Easy to Google. She was never, ever the same after his psychological abuse. And with Nicole and TC working with him. I always wonder what Scientology has on TC that keeps him there unable to leave, for life. Not insinuating anything but makes ya wonder. Let's keep what female actresses have alleged about Quentin Tarantinos treatment of them in mind too, shall we? And take record of who continues to work with who, despite the "talk" which they all have heard no doubt.

c dan run said...

Boo, you should be writing some reader blinds (or are you???).

Got any titillating tales about Felicity Kendall, my teenage crush?

Few Views said...

@Halloweenie I agree with you except that, as a novel, Lolita is is not an apologist work -- it has a deep level of compassion and understanding for the victim, and judgment on Humbert Humbert. The film adaptations totally distort the story into pure exploitation.

Boo Hearne said...

c dan run- No, reader blinds. Most of the really interesting things I lived through I can't write about. Know a little too much about certain people that could find me floating in the Hudson should I reveal them.

Felicity? So sorry. She has never been on my radar. Do remember she was shacking up with Tom Stoppard for a while. Briefly met Mr. Stoppard one Saturday afternoon at a Tea in a friend's back yard. I did not know who he was. This was 1969 and I weren't that lit-rit at the time. Do remember asking the hostess, "Who is the Jewish guy with Fiona?" Strange look from hostess. "Jewish? Tom's not Jewish." Decades later, big story in The New York Times: Tom Stoppard Discovers He's Jewish. So tempted to call Hostess and remind her of my question back in the day about Mr. Tom. Couldn't. She died years before.

Bubbles said...

Does Boo do reader blinds? That's funny. Boo is a little too articulate and her ability to tell a story when commenting that excite me more than the Himmmmm blinds of late disqualifies her. Have you read those reader blinds? Not a pretty sight.

OB said...

Again with the commenters who know someone they have never met could never do anything like this blind, or it can't be true because someone who has never been identified here admires the individual revealed. How do you know these people so well? You're either Miss Cleo or the persons themselves; otherwise, if you don't like the reveal, you're way too invested here and no one cares

totaji said...

Woah Angela. Did you ever think for a minute the hmmmm you mentioned is a source for the Kubrick info? And maybe even if Kubrick did this stuff, he’s still one of the best film makers ever. What’s done is done. This site is like sports betting. Just because Brady is out, doesn’t mean the pats are going to lose, but it’s more probable they could. Just because this blind is here doesn’t make it fact, but it certainly increases the chance that it is.

sammolicious13 said...

+1

Maggie T said...

Watch interviews of Susan Lyon and read between the lines. So heartbreaking.

Trace said...

The corruption of innocence is especially abhorrent to God.The molestation, rape, and sacrifice of children are the ultimate forms of "corrupting" innocence. Satan wants to have humans go against God in the worst possible ways. These people are doing whatever they can to please their master, Satan, because they have sold their souls to him for money, fame and power. His price is steep, and it is pure evil. The ULTIMATE price that they will pay however, will be as extremely unpleasant as every evil deed that they have committed, but by 10 fold.For eternity.

shakey said...

I understand that pain, Rivka and Youtoo. I’ve gotten to the point where every movie I see I wonder who abused whom. I recently watched that Chris Evans movie … Gifted. I almost cried thinking that something could have happened to that little girl (who was amazing) then I had the stupid thought, no way would Chris Evans allow that. Captain America? Come on. I’m beginning to disbelieve a lot of it because it’s information overload. Too many people involved and too many people in the know, yet nothing is done about it.

And this? Well, Kubrick did look like Satan, but Peter Sellers? I feel heartbroken now.

Why has this been happening for so long?

shakey said...

What are you talking about, Bubbles? The Reader Blind Item reads a hell of a lot better than the Dancing Boy items. Sorry Dancing Boy, I know you have your fans but I can’t be one. Sometimes I have to reread them to try and figure out the point of the blind.

Angela said...

totaji, I was just stating that it would make zero sense for the actual Paul Thomas Anderson to pick for his secret writings a website that would publish such a blind item about Stanley Kubrick. Anderson idolizes Kubrick so much that he even used the very same recording of Thus Spoke Zarathustra featured in 2001 for a scene in Magnolia. So, yes, I called PTA/Himmmm on that "inconsistency" of his, and he answered me with some bullshit explanation, like he doesn't read all of the site, it's totally Enty's right to publish this story because he must have elements, etc.

Let's assume for one second that the actual Paul Thomas Anderson is indeed one of the Himmmms, as he basically outs himself with his own story. Enty says that one of his lifelong heroes, Stanley Kubrick, raped dozens of small children. If I were PTA, which I can swear I'm not, I would ask Enty privately for more explanation, if I trusted the guy and assumed his sources to be solid, even if the truth was to be heartbreaking. The last thing I'd do would be to overlook the story and publish a few days later a 1000 word essay about how I almost put my dick into a drunk and young Jaime Pressly, if she hadn't pissed over her gown. Because I, Paul Thomas Anderson, would give some credibility to the site and to the story about Kubrick.

But, of course, it supposes that the PTA story and the Kubrick blind are true. And that Himmmm is not some low-level Hollywood never-was who crossed paths with a few celebrities years ago and tries to live by proxy stories attributed to them, adding a "dipshit bro" flavor to every story and legend he writes.

(to be continued)

Angela said...

(part 2)

The big clue most of you are missing is the change in the tone of the site since a few years, and especially a few months. In the beginning, the site would publish mostly blinds about cheaters, drinkers, and weirdoes found in compromising situations. For a few months, it has started to imply that basically most of Hollywood is complicit in a huge child molestation ring that involves key names such as Ryan Murphy, the Clintons, Steven Spielberg, Woody Allen, and, at the center of the web, David Geffen. It must be true because Enty also unearths dozens of blind items about old Hollywood involving dead actors and directors who also abused children, like Kubrick or Sellers. So, if it was true decades ago, it can be true today.
Yet, we had other sources years ago telling us of Harvey Weinstein (notice however how much of Enty's blinds were about the women, like the "director's wife", having consensual sex with Weinstein to boost their career, instead of the many instances of rapes and assaults that were the REAL story about Weinstein), Kevin Spacey, Bryan Singer, etc. On this particular front, CDAN is the only website that publishes such stories about these current targets. Actually, almost all of the other gossip sites, who like to share blinds, have shut Enty off. Outside of AGC webpages (which just collects and republishes blinds from other sites), every other gossip site cut all ties with Enty years ago. Ever wondered why?

The only thing I know for sure about this site is that whoever is in charge has a huge beef against David Geffen, and the person is ready to burn Hollywood down because of how much Geffen has a huge network there. Yet, I find it somewhat surprising that a guy like Geffen, who has made hundreds of enemies during his career, could keep on molesting kids during decades, while a lot of powerful people don't use this information to destroy him. But, if some lunatic decided to kill Geffen based on everything he's read about him here, how would you feel? Outside of what the site publishes, we have zero element about Geffen being the monster described. The guy could just be a prick, your average Hollywood self-entitled asshole. He's gay, and out of the closet, but that doesn't make him a pedophile.

Also, one of the things that make the Kubrick story dubious is him inviting a lot of young kids on the set of 2001. Kubrick viscerally hated having strangers on a set. He had to allow the press for one day during the production of 2001, but there's no other story from outsiders about the day they dropped on the set of a Kubrick film. So, the mere thought of Kubrick allowing 7-year-old kids to be close to the sets used in 2001, ready to put their dirty hands on the fragile props is so ridiculous that the allegations are funnier in their sheer stupidity than incriminating.

Huntley Haverstock said...

This is slanderous crap. There’ve been some verifiable blinds here and some bullshit and this is bullshit.

You naive simpletons taking it blindly on faith are doing a real disservice to the memory a decent man and a great artist. His drive and ambition made him unpleasant at times, but everyone who knew Kubrick knew how shy he was around women and how devoted a family man he was. This shit is unforgivable. To hell with this site.

Angela said...

Kubrick's biography has this in the salacious department.

In the early seventies, Kubrick had a huge crush on Julie Christie. He tried to find a reason to meet her, a part or something, but couldn't find the courage to do it. Also, he was married.

And that's basically all.

As Huntley says it, if you have a modicum of knowledge about Kubrick's life, it's obvious that nothing in this blind makes sense. Kubrick moved to the UK to shoot Lolita, as he didn't love Hollywood at all, and there would be less media frenzy and studio dablling during the production. After that, he stayed there, and shot Dr. Strangelove. He returned a couple of times in the US after that, but he didn't go further than New York, as he travelled by boat. Kubrick had developed a phobia about planes, even if he was a licensed pilot. Apparently, he made a near-fatal mistake once, and considered that any other pilot could make the same mistake. That was his motivation. Kubrick never returned to his home country after the world premiere of 2001.
When he was working on the script for The Shining with novelist Diane Johnson, they weren't satisfied by the ending of the novel, and Johnson suggested a few ideas. Kubrick would accept anything, but the only one that disgusted him was the idea about the boy being killed.
Kubrick was also very shy and absent-minded. In the nineties, he was once arrested by security at Harrods or another department store, because they had followed for an hour this dishevelled bearded man who was visiting the store but didn't talk to any salesperson.

He made three films that featured strong sexual content, Lolita, A Clockwork Orange and Eyes Wide Shut, and two of them resulted in many bullshit rumors. People said that there's a X-rated version of Eyes Wide Shut with Harvey Keitel jerking off on Nicole Kidman. The released cut is actually quite close to the source material by Austrian novelist Arthur Schnitzler. Screenwriter Frederic Raphael, who wrote a book on how much he hated working with Stanley Kubrick doesn't mention any significant material being written then cut. Harvey Keitel left production due to some "schedule conflict" (he didn't like the pace and the number of takes) and his part was recast with Sidney Pollack. There was no significant rewrites for the part at this point.
Yet, some people assume there must be some truth to the rumors, up to the point they will believe anything implying that Kubrick was dabbling with shady stuff, even if there's no way that Enty would have some direct knowledge about such serious accusations. And, as I said, it's part of the current narrative on this site: almost every esteemed director or actor in old Hollywood was a piece of shit, so it's a given that every blind item about current Hollywood must be true.

Horselover Phat said...

Thanks for the confirmation Enty, not that I needed it, but THANK YOU.

KUBRICK was always a SICK F--K and his films are nothing but PROPAGANDA for sodomy and paedophilia. I broke Kubrick, and long ago.

You apologists need to UNFUCK yourselves. What sort of C**T lives in "awe" of a sick PAEDOPHILE?

http://subliminalsynchrosphere.blogspot.com/2016/03/eyes-wide-shut-paedo-files.html

http://subliminalsynchrosphere.blogspot.com/2016/10/mk-ultra-monarch-msm-us-election-special.html

http://subliminalsynchrosphere.blogspot.com/2018/06/those-who-are-loudest.html

Horselover Phat said...

The last paragraph is 2001 - made with colleague and GAY PAEDOPHILE Arthur C Clarke. Clarke's paedophilia is not a secret. Kubrick's own daughter Vivian briefly featured as Floyd's daughter in 2001 - that's the link to those 7/8 year old friends. WHAT A SICK F**K. No wonder he also intermarried into the NAZI 3RD REICH'S main propaganda filmmaking dynasty - the Harlans. Veit 'NAZI' Harlan's neice was Kubrick's wife, and Harlan's nephew was Kubrick's producer. Peter Sellers was also primarily a FAGGOT - Any Old IRON, (penis) Goon, Pink (gay) Panther, Princess Margeret Windsor, Sellers.

Horselover Phat said...

So many mentally f**ked apologists. No-one made you worship this PAEDOPHILE, you did it ALL BY YOURSELF. Rather than face the TRUTH, you prefer to go into denial. And for that THERE IS NO EXCUSE. Not only was Kubrick a paedophile - he was also a SATANIST, a sick, Illuminati Satanist. Kubrick MOCKED YOU ALL, and yet you still wanr to believe in his innocence? Wow! YOU PEOPLE ARE MENTALLY ILL.

Horselover Phat said...
This comment has been removed by the author.
Horselover Phat said...

As for that PTA (Paul Thomas Anderson) GROUPIE in this thread - prepare for bad news.

PTA is also a sick, masonic sodomite abuser. I destroyed his FAGGOT propaganda as well. That 2001 homage in FAGNOLIA is nothing but queer. Hence "cock respecting" and a fag (cigarette) segue to GAY 'hate women' CRUISE. All via GAY SCIENCE Nietzsche's Zarathustra and going GREEK via the Odyssey. And with Philadelphia (poof propaganda) Robards, with (queer) Hoffman. No wonder PTA worked with RENT BOY Wahlberg in Boogie 'BUGGERY' Nights - where the fuck is RING-O via a BIG COCK and a (ass) star. There Will Be (sodomy) Blood via mining the brown grease hole and with the GAY laundrette man (Day/Gay Lewis). To bashing head down an alley climax - saying you're finished - and via a milk shake. Anderson wanted the climax set to look like A Clockwork (QUEER) Orange. I can't imagine why (sarcasm)?

Freud? I SHIT HIM.

Advertisement

Popular Posts from the last 30 days