Wednesday, October 06, 2010

Sandra Bullock Is Your New Jennifer Aniston


Jennifer Aniston is probably smoking a cigarette pouting right now because Sandra Bullock at least for this week is the searching for a boyfriend wanting a baby tabloid story. The Enquirer has a piece in their issue this week which can easily be modified to fit any single female in Hollywood. The gist of the story is that Sandra is on "the hunt" for a new man. She wants someone domesticated. Their word, not mine. Does he have to be potty trained too? Sandra also has supposedly been talking to the adoption agency where she got Louis because Sandra wants another baby. If she does ever adopt another baby then she will probably get 10 covers a year where tabloids speculate that she is about to adopt another baby. Apparently in Hollywood, adopting babies is a lot like a tattoo. Having one is one thing, but if you go for a second tattoo then you are totally game for three or four or five.

13 comments:

rebellious, contrary and nice said...

Rolls eyes.

lanasyogamama said...

Sandra doesn't have the fame whore thing that Aniston does.

MISCH said...

Oh please, Sandy is a down to earth smart gal....this is bull

Jackie said...

I might be the only one left, but I don't blame Jen Aniston for all those stories. The tabloids love to write that crap because it gets sold. And it's actually hurt her career, not helped.

But overall I am sick and tired of the "need a man" bullshit! What's wrong with a strong (single) woman, raising a family and being successful? I am 27 and live in a small midwestern town, and society has deemed me a spinster because I am unmarried. And it's all because of crap like this from tabloids and celebrities. I think Sandra would be successful with or without a man in her life.

RocketQueen said...

I think it's helped Jen's career. Another romantic comedy anyone?? "Oh why can't Jen just find love?!"

Jackie said...

But Jen's movies never do any good. She might get paid for them, but she can't get much cred or good reputation for 'em. Plus, there's no way she'll ever get the "serious" roles like Sandra can get....then again, that has more to do with talent! :-)

MommaSaid said...

I'm offended that there is even a comparison between these two. Aniston has the poor single me market cornered, not Sandy. This smells fishy.

jax said...

i'm so hungry i saw poutine ,not pouting.
that is all.

jax said...
This comment has been removed by the author.
sunnyside1213 said...

Sandy is way to classy for this bs.

MCH said...

I think both ladies are just fine on their own. I highly doubt Sandra has much time for man hunting with an infant in tow.

Pookie said...

mch ftw.

ms_goddess said...

Don't believe Sandra Bullock would stoop to this level. Let her be!

Also, Jackie - wait until you're 43, never been married, no children. Talk about spinster treatment!

Advertisement

Popular Posts from the last 30 days