Sunday, August 25, 2019

Blind Item #1

This royal keeps digging himself further and further into a hole, forgetting of course that every room was rigged for audio and video recording. 

45 comments:

gfbcpa said...

Prince Andrew

J said...

Hey Brits, congratulations on paying this guy's way!

Maybe you can shell out to renovate one of his mansions again this year!

Me said...

Prince Andrew is running out of LUCK.

herbert arnold said...

now you know why there have been so many stories in the media about 'deep fake videos' the past few months. theyre trying to get ahead of what they know is coming,

Gator said...

Nothing is going to come of this, the royal family members always get off scot free, it's disgusting.

momo said...

I always knew it worked both ways. I worked under video audio surveillance going back to the 80s and was never happy about it, but at least I knew I was on camera. I was a bar manager, circa 85,6 and the insane club owner lived across the street and watched me all the time while he did coke.

BUT as I said this shit works all ways, no one is really immune to it. You can't walk down the street without being recognized by a camera.

momo said...

By the way protesters in Hong Kong pulled down a facial recognition camera on a pole and destroyed it. Things are heating up!

Do Tell said...

Jack The Ripper was rumored to be a member of the BRF. Specifically, Queen Victoria's grandson, Prince Albert Victor.

molly said...

Gator......The Curse, "All the plans of the dark ones to hurt others backfire back on to themselves, their enemies are blessed.".......so we'll see.

Samantha the 1st said...

I don't believe the Ripper was anything exotic.

There are multiple Ripper books. The royal theory seems the least plausible to me.

Samantha the 1st said...
This comment has been removed by the author.
Samantha the 1st said...

Re the royal ripper theory - If they wanted to just get rid of a dirt poor girl a prince allegedly got in a family way - they didn't have to go to all that trouble, which also called maximum attention.

Anonymous said...

@herbert Arnold...Good point. When one of these recordings finally breaks about someone big enough, they are just going to tell us this is the first "deep fake" to be used on the public...when in reality it's probably real. I just don't know if PA and the British Royals are considered that "big" to roll out the first deep fake scam for.

Count Jerkula said...

Not the Prince. He was just the one who knocked up the Catholic broad. Freemasons killed the whores who knew.

Sd Auntie said...

exile this man and along with good for nothing daughters.

Substance D said...

The krauts that have squatted on the throne for over 300 years are just a distraction while their Venetian overlords rob the world blind. The name you want is Breakspear, one of the unseen clan that are currently relocating to southeast Asia where slavery is still going strong and natural resources are easy pickins'. The world of Randy Andy is all scripted bullshite to keep hoi polloi clutching their sphincters in righteous indignation.

Monkeyweather said...

Excellent! They need to do that with ALL of the cameras

Monkeyweather said...

The so-called "nobility" used to knock up servant girls all the time. Rape, often enough. They wouldn't go too far outta their way to silence a victim because.... It was commonplace.

Monkeyweather said...

There is no "deep fake" technology - all manipulation and fabrication of video can be detected.
Sounds like you already know that, but for anyone who doesn't? "Deep fake" is what the "elite" will try to claim when video of the crimes against children become available for public viewing.
That's why Obama has been priming the pump, running around telling everyone to beware of "deep fakes", and to not believe VIDEOS.

Monkeyweather said...

Payseur

Anonymous said...

The end goal is you quit supporting his lifestyle. No more public money available to Randy Andy. No more security. No more anything on the taxpayers dime. I know you have it in you Brits you just need to suck it up and put your foot down.

Count Jerkula said...

It isnt rape if they are your property

Samantha the 1st said...

CJ - that makes it automatic rape, because "property" cannot say no or consent, it has no voice or rights.

Samantha the 1st said...

Do Tell/CJ - I agree w/ Monkeyweather; there is a long standing tradition of 'royal/noble bastards.'

Nothing to kvell about.

Long before DNA. The nobles could choose to acknowledge or deny.

It could be, btw, why I'm not plotzing over the Andy stuff. What's new?

Do Tell said...

All I said is that it was a rumor.

Anyway, anyone that goes out specifically looking for women (or anyone else) to rip apart in the most disgusting way possible, that is someone dealing with a mental disorder that is compelling them to do it, royal or not, who is driven to do it. Mental illness affects the rich and the poor.

Now! said...

Andrew travels a lot. Helicopter crash?

Do Tell said...

That is a horrible way to die. I wouldn't wish that on anyone.

Krab said...

Well, what's Andrew supposed to say? "Oh right, ya got me?" Of course he's gonna deny, deny, deny until it blows over.

Count Jerkula said...

No it doesnt. If i breed hogs, i dont need the sow's consent for the boar to stick his corkscrew cock in her and fill her with a coke can's volume of jizz.

Count Jerkula said...

It wasnt just about a bastard, it was about a catholic being inline for the throne.

Rosie riveter said...

Omfg this blind really brought out the A-team Hahahaahahahahaa

Now! said...

Oh, I don’t wish it on him at all. I just wonder how the Royals think they’re going to get out of this without ruining the entire franchise.

Markle and her husband can be sent into exile, but what can they do with Andrew?

Anyway, I see Bea’s wedding venue has been moved to Italy, and I assume her rich groom will pick up the tab. This is not a good time to ask the British taxpayers to finance Andrew’s daughter’s wedding.

SwishyFishy said...

Eh, the prince as Jack the Ripper has been firmly debunked. He wasn't even in England for most of the murders. The have narrowed it down to some Polish butcher with schizophrenia who lived in the area and some other guy with a penchant for violence. Then there's Patricia Cornwell who thinks it's the artist Walter Sickert.

AbbyRock said...

Isn't it a shame that those that at the top have lied about so much for so long that we cannot believe a word they say?

I would not doubt that Albert Victor was Jack the Ripper. There are some nut cases in that family. Remember there was nothing like the internet in those days and the royals could say whatever they wanted to say and people were expected to believe it. Just because a few well placed people said AV was somewhere else does not mean that he was. There had to have been smoke for this rumor to have developed fire in the first place.


Unknown said...

Obama is on that same deep fake talking points tour. He needs to cover his ass for what's coming for him.

Unknown said...

Yup. Don't believe your lyin eyes.

Samantha the 1st said...

Swishy - did you read her book?

She made a decent case that he trolled them with some letters (the paper printing lot was very small), but, I wasn't convinced by the rest.

He did sound like a real piece of work, though, in other ways.

Speaking of the letters: forensic experts claim that at least some of them were written by reporters. I recall wondering why or how he would've had such calm, even penmanship. The theory is that papers wrote some of the letters so they could increase readership, and it worked.

BRAD PITT said...

royal keeps digging himself further into a hole = Prince Andrew

audio and video recording = Epstein island

All X's said...

@Substance D - Never seen a sphincter necklace...

Pj harvey fan said...

The fucker will get away with it. Evil bastard. He should do an Epstein.

emeraldcity said...

@Gator ......not all of them get away with their misdeeds, Lord Louis Mountbatten is the prime example. The family and the establishment may close ranks around them but there are still people who know the truth and will act if the opportunity arises.

TC said...

herbert arnold said...
now you know why there have been so many stories in the media about 'deep fake videos' the past few months. theyre trying to get ahead of what they know is coming,

^^^THIS^^^

Last year the Deep Fake stories started in earnest when the infamous "Hillary & Huma" video was supposedly about to ooze its way out of the dark web. Then the Deep Fake news disappeared just after the the video was determined to be bs. Now its back out the second we hear about Epstein's video evidence being made public or in the possession of the Feds.

Samantha the 1st said...

What happened to Mountbatten was brutal. They took out not only him but a twin son and someone else too.

That wasn't how the IRA (blamed for the attack) normally would work, was it?

But, I obviously don't know a lot about it all.

Giada said...

I’ll bet the Palace heads are concerned because there’s a new different kind of Sherrif Trump in town. They don’t know what he’ll do/allow. We’re living in a new day they’re not use to. Things are heating up. I’ll bet they’re praying truths aren’t told.

TC said...

Unknown said...
I’ll bet the Palace heads are concerned because there’s a new different kind of Sherrif Trump in town. They don’t know what he’ll do/allow. We’re living in a new day they’re not use to. Things are heating up. I’ll bet they’re praying truths aren’t told.

Agreed but IMO they are mostly worried about the PR fallout, and possibility that people will wake up and finally get it through their heads that any kind of "royal" is an anachronism in today's world.

I still don't think they can touch the Prince legally, they have already banned him from traveling to the US, that is about as much as they can do to him.

Advertisements

Popular Posts from the last 30 days