US Weekly Changed Their Shiloh Headline
The great thing about the internet is that things can happen quickly. In addition, with the backtracking of links, people can read what you have written about a given topic. Within a few hours last week of writing the post about how US Weekly and other tabloids should be ashamed of what they were saying about Shiloh, US Weekly changed their headline and their article.
Their new headline says "PIC: Shiloh, 4, Frolics in the Pool" The article also removed anything about her clothing choice or dressing like a boy. I actually feel like we did something good last week. I think having so many people comment on the story and the strong reactions everyone had played a huge part.
28 comments:
I strongly think celebrities' kids should be off-limits to photogs, unless they're with Mom or Dad celeb.
We need laws in the publishing world.
These kids are not "in the public eye", not celebs, not able to make decisions as an adult.
This could be used as child porn. It puts kids in danger. We don't need to know EVERYTHING about celebs. Give 'em some privacy, for God's sake.
I agree--paps---hands off kids. Anyone's kids.
However, Shiloh certainly seems like a boy to me.
Yay for the public ! And I do agree with Jim - celebrities children should be off-limits unless they're on the red carpet.
Leave these kids and other celebrity kids alone. Off Limits. Period. And for goodness sake leave this family alone!
Coupled with the recent "news" (like who hasn't seen it coming for years...) that girls are reaching puberty younger and younger, it'll be more than some sick pedos can stand, so we need to be EXTRA vigilant not to post pix of peoples KIDS for chrissakes.
Hell, I'd RATHER my girl dress as a boy than in some of the slutty kids' wear I see these days.
US Weekly should be ashamed, EVEN if the parents use their kids as publicity. Ought to be a law.
And I cannot even get started on BS like Toddlers & Tiaras. Grrrrrrr!!! Seeing adults purposely slutting-up children makes my skin crawl.
Personally I don't care if Shiloh is gay or straight....Happy and healthy is a good beginning...
Regardless of her wanting to dress like a boy, I think 4 years old is too old to show a topless photo of a girl. She is not an infant, she is pre-school age. Not right.
It was unnecessary to use this photo in the first place, and making any sexual remarks about a child is just low. I agree that celebrity children should be off limits except for organized functions like red carpet events or planned interviews with the parents where the children are included.
Now they just need to remove the photo too and get a fucking clue. Stop sneaking around in bushes, taking photos of little girls in pools. It's creepy. Why doesn't US understand that basic point? It's a private moment and they are not famous. Kids should be off limits. Period.
Patty, I agree. Even if she doesn't *want* to dress like a girl, she IS one and should at least wear some sort of bathing suit top.... this is just opening doors up for trouble.
Agree with Jim B 110%. Children of celebrities should not be targets of photos. It's one thing if they are with their parents on a red carpet, etc. (when there is an expectation of being in the public eye) but it's just intrusive otherwise.
With fame comes responsibility on the parents as well. They should NOT allow their daughter to be seen in public without some sort of top on. I agree with the poster above. She IS a girl and needs to dress appropriately. Why no fingers pointing at parents who would allow their children to be seen in public like this? They KNOW full well that they will be photographed.
don't fool yourself. Shiloh IS a star! i went to Europe and all the street artists had giant pics of her next to Brad and Angie...and people were buying them!!! fools.
Suri Cruise gets her own headlines in the British papers, which is sad.
I do think that some celeb parents do a good job of shielding their kids from the press and others use their kids for PR.
I was born in Norway where kids are not sexualized like they are in these parts of the world. It makes no sense that a four year-old should have to cover up none-excistent breasts! She is years away from puberty.
That being said, since I do live in the US I do cover up my two year-old daughter myself. At home she runs around naked, but she has to wear proper clothes outside. I do find it a bit depressing, though.
@Ice Angel: How do you know this isn't a private function? Or on their property, or a friend? I agree something more gender-appropriate is needed if this is a public event. This pool doesn't have a public vibe.
But photog'rs should not be taking this picture. No excuse. Ever.
I'd like to think it was us, too, but my reality check meter is pointing towards Angie enforcing the changes via a big fat lawyer's letter. ;>
Speaking of Suri, I'm glad her and her parents have been off the radar for a little while. Nice to have a break from them.
I thought the same thing ThoughtElf.
I am a little shocked that some people feel that a four year old kid should "cover up". I find that notion a bit disturbing. I see little girls in triangle bikinis that say "juicy" on the bum all the time, and I have to say I find Shiloh's shorts a hell of a lot more appropriate. She's a KID. There is nothing to cover up.
@Ice Angel said...They should NOT allow their daughter to be seen in public without some sort of top on.
this was in their backyard, shot thru trees. they didn't go to the supermarket like this...
I disagree with all of you. It has been well noted that Angelina guides the photos that are shown of her and her family. IF Angelina and Brad DID NOT authorize this photo and it was taken on private property they would be suing and the picture would be removed altogether.
Personally I find the picture a tad bit too personal and want it removed from the internet permanently not just because of Shiloh but I'm also uncomfortable with the shot of Zahara.
JMO
ita, Patty.
and excellent point, nomd.
By all means, let's hang the victims based on postulated excuses for the photog's behavior.
To the people sniping at the child for acting like a normal kid (including suggesting she "dress like a girl"), honestly, I'm worried more about YOUR children than I am about that little girl. Little girls do not have breasts. To suggest they cover-up non-existent breasts is ridiculous. Little girls ran around in shorts all summer when I was a kid.
Leave her alone. The photographer should be ashamed of himself.
what was the original headline?
i live in Italy and young girls the age of Shilo do not cover their top if they do not want to since they look EXACTLY like the boys.. wow i did live in the US at different stages of my life but i had never realized how close to some.. ehm... arab countries certain positions on girls clothing were
what nomd said.
Why should she cover up at age 4? Just because she will one day have breasts? She doesn't yet. Children at that age are built the same. If you looked at that photo and didn't know it was Shiloh, you'd think it was a boy. She shouldn't have to wear something to cover her chest just because our society has recently decided little girls are supposed to.
Post a Comment