October 5, 2015
These two former tweener actresses turned business partners refuse to answer any questions from any reporter about anything other than their business. They make it clear they will walk out of any other interview. Therefore, they have not received any requests during what should be a very busy time for them.
Olsen twins
Posted by
ent lawyer
at
2:45 AM
Labels: blind items revealed
Crazy Days and Nights is a gossip site. The site publishes rumors, conjecture, and fiction. In addition to accurately reported information, certain situations, characters and events portrayed in the Blog are either products of the author’s imagination or are used fictitiously. Information on this site may contain errors or inaccuracies; the Blog’s proprietor does not make warranty as to the correctness or reliability of the site's content. Links to content on and quotation of material from other sites are not the responsibility of Crazy Days and Nights.
Cookies & 3rd Party Advertisements Google, as a third party vendor, uses cookies to serve ads on your site. Google's use of the DART cookie enables it to serve ads to your users based on their visit to your sites and other sites on the Internet. Users may opt out of the use of the DART cookie by visiting the Google ad and content network privacy policy. We allow third-party companies to serve ads and/or collect certain anonymous information when you visit our web site. These companies may use non-personally identifiable information (e.g., click stream information, browser type, time and date, subject of advertisements clicked or scrolled over) during your visits to this and other Web sites in order to provide advertisements about goods and services likely to be of greater interest to you. These companies typically use a cookie or third party web beacon to collect this information. To learn more about this behavioral advertising practice or to opt-out of this type of advertising, you can visit https://www.networkadvertising.org/managing/opt_out.asp.
18 comments:
Trolls
bitches
I disagree. Why would they respond to questions about an ongoing lawsuit? Also, why should they take questions about a Full House reunion when they've been spent the last nearly 10 years establishing their fashion lines?
It's called crappy journalism, as the only reason to push either line of questioning is for sensationalism and for the celebrity angle, neither of which bears much relevancy to the collection they're unveiling for Paris Fashion Week.
hags
I do like their stuff but it's insanely expensive like the other designers. Wonder what they are really like?
NAILED IT FIRST BITCHEZ
Lol!
I've always thought they looked a little like those little trolls you stick on top of pencil erasers.
Of course you did
They're lucky they're rich, because they are short and ugly and apparently have gross personalities.
Can't say I blame them. This day and age when "journalists" are known for twisting words from an interview, why bother. And, I don't know how their line is doing, but doubt their bank accounts are hurting from not getting interviews.
I have no shade for these two. They're not falling out of clubs with their underwear showing or photos leaked of them doing coke. Not to say they don't get trashy, but they do it behind closed doors.
I second your sentiment!
Midget Trolls at that.
Well, there was that minor incident where Mary Kate was intertwined with Heath Ledger's overdose. That was front and center for a while.
Shssssssh. It's the normal., secretive, complicated and complicit life of under the bridge dwelling twin trolls.. Mirror Image, duo galactic guardians of the Milky Way..
I diagree. It's actually crappy marketing on the twins' part. If they care to get word of their line out, it's only sensible to give a little to get a little.
The spoiled, "My way or the highway" pair naturally cannot discuss matters under litigation, though they could and should talk about "Full House", because to most viewers it was a positive experience in which they fondly recall the twins, who have since grown up, and are showing their fashion at Fashion Week in Paris; a much more positive light about their endeavors than laying down limitations and expecting the press to agree to give them something for nothing. Why should they agree? So they may plug a line of clothes, give them free ads, for a pair of demanding adult brats? No one worth anything would agree. Give honey instead of vinegar.
Bullshit. It's not journalism at all to publish what is essentially free advertising/a press release.
Full House has nothing to do with creating a long term, strategic, top shelf fashion brand, especially after 10 years of time have passed. Now, if this was in relation to their "Olsen Twins" licensing program, yes, absolutely. However, it's no longer valid. Look at someone like Ron Howard, although not in fashion, his work now stands on its own, he is not simply Opie or, for that matter, Richie.
Check out this WSJ article wherein retailers specifically cite that they were not interested in a celebrity driven line, a la Jessica Simpson, however, The Row was high design and fashion driven. There was no want of Full House.
http://www.wsj.com/articles/SB10001424052702303627504579558221512719340
Those cute little dolls exude more personality and charm than the Olson double tragedy.
Post a Comment